医学
乌斯特基努马
塞库金单抗
阿达木单抗
银屑病性关节炎
内科学
银屑病
药品
肿瘤科
皮肤病科
药理学
疾病
作者
Neslihan Akdoğan,Sibel Doğan,Ecem Bostan,Duygu Gülseren,Başak Yalıcı‐Armağan,Gonca Elçin,Sibel Ersoy Evans,Ayşen Karaduman,Nilgün Atakan
标识
DOI:10.1080/17512433.2021.1979394
摘要
The demand of biologic switching is increasing for different reasons.We aimed to define reasons for switching biologics and possible predictors for switching risk,and to estimate data on drug survival.115 patients treated with biologics who switched to a second, third,and/or fourth biologic were eligible for this retrospective study.Patients were divided into 2 groups as switched once,and switched twice or more.Drug survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.All patients switched at least one, 36 patients switched twice, and 9 switched thrice. First-, second-, and third-line biologics were mostly switched due to secondary lack of efficacy for skin disease.Each unit increase in age decreased the risk of having ≥2 switches 4% (p=0.038,OR:0.964,95%CI:0.93-0.998),whereas PsA increased the risk of having ≥2 switches 2.69-fold (p=0.026,OR:2.69,95%CI:1.12-6.44).There was significant difference between biologics in terms of drug survival(p=0.001).Adalimumab had a lower drug survival compared to ustekinumab(p<0.001) and secukinumab(p=0.003) in transition from second-line biologic to third-line biologic.Switching biologics was most commonly due to secondary lack of efficacy for skin disease.Lower ages and the presence of PsA were associated with a higher need for switching in long-term.Ustekinumab and secukinumab are superior to adalimumab in clinical practice in terms of drug survival of second-line biologics.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI