摘要
Structural Control and Health MonitoringVolume 19, Issue 3 p. 332-347 Research Article Parametric identification of the Dahl model for large scale MR dampers N. Aguirre, Corresponding Author N. Aguirre [email protected] Department of Applied Mathematic III, School of Technical Industrial Engineering of Barcelona, Technical University of Catalunya, Urgell 187, 08036 Barcelona, SpainDepartment of Applied Mathematic III, School of Technical Industrial Engineering of Barcelona, Technical University of Catalunya, Urgell 187, 08036 Barcelona, SpainSearch for more papers by this authorF. Ikhouane, F. Ikhouane Department of Applied Mathematic III, School of Technical Industrial Engineering of Barcelona, Technical University of Catalunya, Urgell 187, 08036 Barcelona, SpainSearch for more papers by this authorJ. Rodellar, J. Rodellar Department of Applied Mathematic III, Technical University of Catalunya, Campus Nord C-2 08034, BarcelonaSearch for more papers by this authorR. Christenson, R. Christenson Department Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Connecticut, 261 Glenbrook Road, Unit 2037, Storrs, CT 06269-2037, U.S.A.Search for more papers by this author N. Aguirre, Corresponding Author N. Aguirre [email protected] Department of Applied Mathematic III, School of Technical Industrial Engineering of Barcelona, Technical University of Catalunya, Urgell 187, 08036 Barcelona, SpainDepartment of Applied Mathematic III, School of Technical Industrial Engineering of Barcelona, Technical University of Catalunya, Urgell 187, 08036 Barcelona, SpainSearch for more papers by this authorF. Ikhouane, F. Ikhouane Department of Applied Mathematic III, School of Technical Industrial Engineering of Barcelona, Technical University of Catalunya, Urgell 187, 08036 Barcelona, SpainSearch for more papers by this authorJ. Rodellar, J. Rodellar Department of Applied Mathematic III, Technical University of Catalunya, Campus Nord C-2 08034, BarcelonaSearch for more papers by this authorR. Christenson, R. Christenson Department Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Connecticut, 261 Glenbrook Road, Unit 2037, Storrs, CT 06269-2037, U.S.A.Search for more papers by this author First published: 10 February 2011 https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.434Citations: 26Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL SUMMARY Magnetorheological (MR) dampers are promising control devices in civil engineering structures as they combine reliability and stability of passive systems while maintaining versatility of active devices without large power requirements. These dampers are intrinsically nonlinear, so one of the challenging aspects of applying this technology is the development of accurate models to describe their behaviour for control design and evaluation purposes. This paper deals with the parametric identification of three large-scale MR dampers which are modelled using the viscous + Dahl model. Experimental results show reasonably good agreement with the forces predicted by the identified models. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. REFERENCES 1 Carlson JD, Weiss KD. A growing attraction to magnetic fuids. A growing attraction to magnetic fuids. Machine Design 1994; 8: 61– 66. 2 Ashour O, Rogers CA, Kordonsky W. Magnetorheological fuids: materials, characterization and devices. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 1996; 7: 123– 130. DOI: 10.1177/1045389X9600700201. 3 Savaresi SM, Bittanti D, Montiglio M. Identification of semi-physical and blackbox non-linear models: the case of MR dampers for vehicles control. Automatica 2005; 41: 113– 127. DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2004.08.012. 4 Dahl PR. A solid friction model. Technical Report, The Aerospace Corporation, El Secundo, CA, 1968. 5 Zhou Q, Nielsen SRK, Qu WL. Semi-active control of three-dimensional vibrations of an inclined sag cable with magnetorheological dampers. Journal of Sound and Vibration 2006; 296: 1– 22. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2005.10.028. 6 Zhou Q, Nielsen SRK, Qu WL. Semi-active control of shallow cables with magnetorheological dampers under harmonic axial support motion. Journal of Sound and Vibration 2008; 311: 683– 706. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2007.09.022. 7 Şahin Í, Engin T, Çeşmeci Ş. Comparison of some existing parametric models for magnetorheological fluid dampers. Journal of Smart Materials and Structures 2010; 19. DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/19/3/035012. 8 Ikhouane F, Rodellar J. Systems with Hysteresis: Analysis, Identification and Control Using the Bouc-Wen Model. Wiley: Chichester, U.K., 2007. 9 Ikhouane F, Dyke SJ. Modeling and identification of a shear mode magnetorheological damper. Journal of Smart Materials and Structures 2007; 16: 605– 616. DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/16/3/007. 10 Rodriguez A, Ikhouane F, Rodellar J, Luo N. Modeling and identification of a small-scale magnetorheological damper. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 2009; 20: 825– 835. DOI: 10.1177/1045389X08098440. 11 Rodriguez A, Iwata N, Ikhouane F, Rodellar J. Model identification of a large-scale magnetorheological fluid damper. Journal of Smart Materials and Structures 2009; 18. DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/18/1/015010. 12 Dahl PR. Solid friction damping of mechanical vibrations. AIAA Journal 1976; 14: 1675– 1682. 13 Bouc R. Modèle mathématique d'hystérésis (a mathematical model for hysteresis). Acustica 1971; 21: 16– 25. 14 Ikhouane F, Rodellar J. On the hysteretic Bouc-Wen model. Part I: forced limit cycle characterization. Nonlinear Dynamics 2005; 42: 63– 78. DOI: 10.1007/s11071-005-0069-3. 15 Ikhouane F, Rodellar J, Hurtado JE. Analytical characterization of hysteresis loops described by the Bouc-Wen model. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures 2006; 13: 463– 472. DOI: 10.1080/15376490600862830. 16 Yang G, Spencer Jr BF, Carlson JD, Sain MK. Large-scale MR fluid dampers: modeling and dynamic performance considerations. Journal of Engineering Structures 2002; 24: 309– 323. 17 Bahar A, Pozo F, Acho L, Rodellar J, Barbat A. Hierarchical semi-active control of base-isolated structures using a new inverse model of magnetorheological dampers. Journal of Computers and Structures 2010; 88: 483– 496. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2010.01.006. 18 Kwok NM, Ha QP, Nguyen TH, Li J, Samali B. A novel hysteretic model for magnetorheological fluid damper and parameter identification using particle swarm optimization. Journal of Sensor and Actuators A: Physical 2006; 132: 441– 451. DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2006.03.015. 19 Yoshioka H, Ramallo JC, Spencer Jr BF. Smart base isolation strategies employing magnetorheological dampers. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 2002; 128: 540– 551. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:5(540). 20 Dyke SJ, Spencer Jr BF, Sain MK, Carlson JD. Modeling and control of magnetorheological dampers for seismic response reduction. Journal of Smart Materials and Structures 2002; 5: 565– 575. DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/5/5/006, 1996. 21 Sahasrabudhe S, Nagarajaiah S. Semi-active control of sliding isolated bridges using MR dampers: an experimental and numerical study. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2005; 34: 965– 983. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.464. 22 Casciati F, Magonette G, Marazzi F. Technology of Semiactive Devices and Applications in Vibration Mitigation. Wiley: New York, 2006. 23 Jansen LM, Dyke SJ. Semi-active control strategies for the MR damper: comparative study. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 2000; 126: 795– 803. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:8(795). Citing Literature Volume19, Issue3April 2012Pages 332-347 ReferencesRelatedInformation