肺炎
不利影响
莫西沙星
随机对照试验
耐受性
阿奇霉素
临床试验
养生
抗生素
作者
Carlos Bergallo,Abel Jasovich,Osvaldo Teglia,Maria Eugenia Oliva,Arnold L. Lentnek,Luisa de Wouters,Juan Carlos Zlocowski,Gary Dukart,Angel Cooper,Rajiv Mallick
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2008.09.001
摘要
Abstract Tigecycline exhibits potent in vitro activity against many community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) pathogens, including antibiotic-resistant ones. Its spectrum of activity and ability to penetrate lung tissue suggest it may be effective for hospitalized CAP patients. Hospitalized CAP patients ( n = 418) were randomized to receive intravenous (IV) tigecycline or levofloxacin. Patients could be switched to oral levofloxacin after receiving 6 or more doses of IV study medication. Therapy duration was 7 to 14 days. Coprimary efficacy end points were clinical responses in the clinically evaluable (CE: tigecycline, n = 138; levofloxacin, n = 156) and clinical modified intent-to-treat (c-mITT: tigecycline, n = 191; levofloxacin, n = 203) populations at test-of-cure (TOC). Safety was assessed in the mITT population (tigecycline, n = 208; levofloxacin, n = 210). Cure rates in tigecycline and levofloxacin groups were comparable in CE (90.6% versus 87.2%, respectively) and c-mITT (78% versus 77.8%, respectively) populations at TOC. Nausea and vomiting occurred in significantly more tigecycline-treated patients; elevated alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels were reported in significantly more levofloxacin-treated patients. There were no significant differences in hospital length of stay, median duration of IV or oral antibiotic treatments, hospital readmissions, or number of patients switched to oral levofloxacin. Tigecycline was safe, effective, and noninferior to levofloxacin in hospitalized patients with CAP.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI