头孢哌酮
头孢唑肟
医学
头孢克肟
头孢呋辛
头孢地尼
头孢替安
头孢泊肟
头孢菌素
头孢克洛
头孢曲松
舒巴坦钠
头孢噻肟
药理学
抗生素
化学
抗生素耐药性
亚胺培南
生物化学
作者
Khac Dung Nguyen,Dinh Hoa Vu,Hoang‐Anh Nguyen,van Toan Dao,Jean‐Louis Montastruc,Haleh Bagheri
摘要
There is limited data on the specific risks of anaphylaxis induced by beta-lactam drugs. The aim of this study was to compare the risks of reporting beta-lactam-induced anaphylaxis using the national pharmacovigilance database of Vietnam (NPDV).The multivariate generalised linear regression model was applied for signal generation and comparison of beta-lactams.Between 2010 and 2016, there were 2,921 reports of anaphylaxis (19.93%) from 14,655 spontaneous reports of beta-lactam use in the NDPV. Anaphylaxis signal generation was also found for the subgroup J01D (cephalosporins and carbapenems) (ROR = 1.27 [1.16-1.39]) and beta-lactamase-sensitive penicillins (ROR = 1.74 [1.27-2.35]). In the third generation cephalosporin subgroup, different risks were identified for the following combinations of beta-lactams: 1) cefotaxime with cefoperazone+sulbactam; 2) cefixime/cefpodoxime/cefdinir with cefoperazone+sulbactam or ceftizoxime/cefoperazone/ceftazidime/ceftriaxone/cefotaxime. For the second generation cephalosporin subgroup, different risks were found for cefotiam compared to cefmetazole, cefaclor, cefamandole and cefuroxime.These findings identified and highlighted the different anaphylactic risks caused by various beta-lactams in the main subgroups.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI