Does essentialism lead to racial prejudice? It is not so Black and White

本质主义 偏见(法律术语) 社会心理学 心理学 认识论 哲学
作者
Tara M. Mandalaywala
出处
期刊:Advances in Child Development and Behavior [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:: 195-245 被引量:18
标识
DOI:10.1016/bs.acdb.2020.05.007
摘要

Over half a century ago, psychologists hypothesized that social essentialism, an intuitive theory comprising the beliefs that social categories reflect naturally occurring distinctions and that category members share an underlying and fundamental essence, lays the foundation for prejudice. In the intervening decades, research has shown that although essentialism sometimes leads to prejudicial beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors, it does not always, sometimes even leading to decreased prejudice toward stigmatized groups. The relation between essentialism and prejudice is clearly complex, but this review proposes four questions that will help clarify how and when essentialism leads to prejudice: (1) What precisely is essentialism and how might a more nuanced understanding of its components and structure shed light on the mechanisms by which essentialist beliefs contribute to prejudice?; (2) Do essentialist beliefs orient group-based prejudice toward out-groups or toward stigmatized groups, and what are the consequences of essentialist beliefs among those with minoritized identities?; (3) Do essentialist beliefs engender group-based prejudice directly, or must essentialist beliefs interact with additional information or belief systems to lead to negative consequences?; and (4) Do essentialist beliefs lay a foundation for group-based prejudice to develop, or is essentialism strategically invoked to justify existing prejudice? By posing these questions, describing what is currently known about each, and proposing future lines of inquiry that focus on the importance of including participants from a diverse set of backgrounds and across developmental periods, this review aims to stimulate research studies best designed to fill the gaps in our knowledge. By understanding how and when essentialism contributes to prejudice, we will be better equipped to use this early-emerging, but malleable, aspect of cognition to decrease prejudice and create a more equitable society.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
乐乐应助qiqi大宝贝采纳,获得10
1秒前
壮观的饼干完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
Sunyuu完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
NiNi发布了新的文献求助20
4秒前
nenoaowu发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
乔垣结衣发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
gogogo完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
Jin完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
7秒前
7秒前
科研通AI5应助浮想圆影采纳,获得10
8秒前
共享精神应助深情寻冬采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
2021发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
贪玩手链发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
简单的大哥完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
枫asaki完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
飞猪发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
niuma发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
13秒前
13秒前
王也完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
NiNi完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
carl完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
热心又蓝完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
15秒前
共享精神应助xhuryts采纳,获得10
15秒前
serney发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
16秒前
怪味痘发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
隐形曼青应助nenoaowu采纳,获得10
16秒前
17秒前
Jansen发布了新的文献求助30
17秒前
轩辕十四应助MXX采纳,获得10
18秒前
高分求助中
Applied Survey Data Analysis (第三版, 2025) 800
Assessing and Diagnosing Young Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders (2nd Edition) 700
Images that translate 500
Algorithmic Mathematics in Machine Learning 500
Handbook of Innovations in Political Psychology 400
Mapping the Stars: Celebrity, Metonymy, and the Networked Politics of Identity 400
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3842155
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3384295
关于积分的说明 10533896
捐赠科研通 3104642
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1709781
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 823319
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 774029