亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Mentalization‐based treatment in groups for adolescents with borderline personality disorder: a randomized controlled trial

边缘型人格障碍 心理化 心理学 随机对照试验 反社会人格障碍 临床心理学 人格 心理治疗师 精神科 毒物控制 伤害预防 精神分析 医学 外科 环境卫生
作者
Emma Beck,Sune Bo,Mie Sedoc Jørgensen,Matthias Gondan,Stig Poulsen,Ole Jakob Storebø,Christian Fjellerad Andersen,Espen Folmo,Carla Sharp,Jesper Pedersen,Erik Simonsen
出处
期刊:Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry [Wiley]
卷期号:61 (5): 594-604 被引量:63
标识
DOI:10.1111/jcpp.13152
摘要

Background Borderline personality disorder (BPD) typically onsets in adolescence and predicts later functional disability in adulthood. Highly structured evidence‐based psychotherapeutic programs, including mentalization‐based treatment (MBT), are first choice treatment. The efficacy of MBT for BPD has mainly been tested with adults, and no RCT has examined the effectiveness of MBT in groups (MBT‐G) for adolescent BPD. Method A total of 112 adolescents (111 females) with BPD (106) or BPD symptoms ≥4 DSM‐5 criteria (5) referred to child and adolescent psychiatric outpatient clinics were randomized to a 1‐year MBT‐G, consisting of three introductory, psychoeducative sessions, 37 weekly group sessions, five individual case formulation sessions, and six group sessions for caregivers, or treatment as usual (TAU) with at least 12 monthly individual sessions. The primary outcome was the score on the borderline personality features scale for children (BPFS‐C); secondary outcomes included self‐harm, depression, externalizing and internalizing symptoms (all self‐report), caregiver reports, social functioning, and borderline symptoms rated by blinded clinicians. Outcome assessments were made at baseline, after 10, 20, and 30 weeks, and at end of treatment (EOT). The ClinicalTrials.gov identifier is NCT02068326. Results At EOT, the primary outcome was 71.3 ( SD = 15.0) in the MBT‐G group and 71.3 ( SD = 15.2) in the TAU group (adjusted mean difference 0.4 BPFS‐C units in favor of MBT‐G, 95% confidence interval −6.3 to 7.1, p = .91). No significant group differences were found in the secondary outcomes. 29% in both groups remitted. 29% of the MBT group completed less than half of the sessions compared with 7% of the control group. Conclusions There is no indication for superiority of either therapy method. The low remission rate points to the importance of continued research into early intervention. Specifically, retention problems need to be addressed.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
沉静的安青完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
MissGrrrace完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
34秒前
34秒前
35秒前
xiaoxinbaba发布了新的文献求助10
38秒前
风轻云淡发布了新的文献求助10
40秒前
Darcy应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
41秒前
双目识林完成签到 ,获得积分10
46秒前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
852应助xiaoxinbaba采纳,获得10
1分钟前
ling361完成签到,获得积分0
1分钟前
1分钟前
2分钟前
高大语蕊发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
ajing完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
天天快乐应助高大语蕊采纳,获得80
2分钟前
思源应助袁青寒采纳,获得10
2分钟前
小yang完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
小yang发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
xiaoxinbaba发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
Darcy应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
冷静的访天完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
傲娇而又骄傲完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
4分钟前
zhanggq123发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
4分钟前
研友_VZG7GZ应助zhanggq123采纳,获得30
4分钟前
大模型应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4分钟前
在水一方应助漂亮夏兰采纳,获得10
4分钟前
Akim应助枫泾采纳,获得20
5分钟前
5分钟前
枫泾发布了新的文献求助20
5分钟前
5分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 5000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Propeller Design 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 纳米技术 化学工程 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 冶金 细胞生物学 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6012645
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7572232
关于积分的说明 16139288
捐赠科研通 5159711
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2763175
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1742520
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1634073