The Effects of Leadership Curricula With and Without Implicit Bias Training on Graduate Medical Education: A Multicenter Randomized Trial

课程 随机对照试验 研究生医学教育 妇产科学 医学教育 医学 利克特量表 团队合作 普通合伙企业 心理学 内科学 委派 教育学 管理 政治学 生物 遗传学 发展心理学 经济 法学 怀孕
作者
Mitchell A. Hansen,Tabria Harrod,Nathan Bahr,Amanda Schoonover,Karen Adams,Josh Kornegay,Amy Stenson,Vivienne Ng,Jennifer Plitt,Dylan Cooper,Nicole M. Scott,Sneha A. Chinai,Julia Johnson,Lauren W. Conlon,Catherine R. Salva,Holly Caretta‐Weyer,Trang Huynh,David Jones,Katherine Jorda,Jamie O. Lo,Ryanne Mayersak,Emmanuelle Paré,Kate Hughes,Rami Ahmed,Shama Patel,Suzana Tsao,Eileen Wang,Tony Ogburn,Jeanne‐Marie Guise
出处
期刊:Academic Medicine [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
卷期号:97 (5): 696-703 被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.1097/acm.0000000000004573
摘要

To determine whether a brief leadership curriculum including high-fidelity simulation can improve leadership skills among resident physicians.This was a double-blind, randomized controlled trial among obstetrics-gynecology and emergency medicine (EM) residents across 5 academic medical centers from different geographic areas of the United States, 2015-2017. Participants were assigned to 1 of 3 study arms: the Leadership Education Advanced During Simulation (LEADS) curriculum, a shortened Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS) curriculum, or as active controls (no leadership curriculum). Active controls were recruited from a separate site and not randomized to limit any unintentional introduction of materials from leadership curricula. The LEADS curriculum was developed in partnership with the Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology and Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine as a novel way to provide a leadership toolkit. Both LEADS and the abbreviated TeamSTEPPS were designed as six 10-minute interactive web-based modules.The primary outcome of interest was the leadership performance score from the validated Clinical Teamwork Scale instrument measured during standardized high-fidelity simulation scenarios. Secondary outcomes were 9 key components of leadership from the detailed leadership evaluation measured on 5-point Likert scales. Both outcomes were rated by a blinded clinical video reviewer.One hundred ten obstetrics-gynecology and EM residents participated in this 2-year trial. Participants in both LEADS and TeamSTEPPS had statistically significant improvement in leadership scores from "average" to "good" ranges both immediately and at the 6-month follow-up, while controls remained unchanged in the "average" category throughout the study. There were no differences between LEADS and TeamSTEPPS curricula with respect to the primary outcome.Residents who participated in a brief structured leadership training intervention had improved leadership skills that were maintained at 6-month follow-up.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
忧心的雯发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
lankeren完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
xiaoze完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
oliv完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
神明发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
13完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
今后应助渤大彭于晏采纳,获得10
8秒前
所所应助s0x0y0采纳,获得10
9秒前
隐形曼青应助叙温雨采纳,获得10
10秒前
斯文败类应助Muxi采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
爆米花应助神明采纳,获得10
13秒前
15秒前
Hello应助微弱de胖头采纳,获得30
15秒前
善学以致用应助zljgy2000采纳,获得10
16秒前
田田发布了新的文献求助30
17秒前
s0x0y0完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
18秒前
19秒前
20秒前
20秒前
谦让文龙完成签到,获得积分20
21秒前
21秒前
21秒前
23秒前
夜雨发布了新的文献求助20
24秒前
华仔应助啊七采纳,获得10
25秒前
Cope发布了新的文献求助200
26秒前
谷贝贝发布了新的文献求助30
26秒前
研友_Z7mKyL发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
zf发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
老水完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
29秒前
高分求助中
Evolution 10000
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2800
юрские динозавры восточного забайкалья 800
Diagnostic immunohistochemistry : theranostic and genomic applications 6th Edition 500
Chen Hansheng: China’s Last Romantic Revolutionary 500
China's Relations With Japan 1945-83: The Role of Liao Chengzhi 400
Classics in Total Synthesis IV 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3149387
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2800406
关于积分的说明 7840028
捐赠科研通 2458019
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1308162
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 628456
版权声明 601706