主旨
康复
随机对照试验
物理疗法
人口
心理学
生活质量(医疗保健)
医学
外科
护理部
内科学
间质细胞
环境卫生
作者
Silje Merethe Hansen Ingebretsen,Melanie Kirmess,Milada Cvancarova Småstuen,Lenore Hawley,Jody L. Newman,Jan Stubberud
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2023.02.023
摘要
Abstract
Objective
To determine the efficacy of group interactive structured treatment (standard GIST) for improving social communication difficulties in a wider acquired brain injury (ABI) population compared to a waitlist control (WL). Secondary objectives were to (a) explore GIST across delivery formats by comparing the results to an intensive inpatient version of GIST (intensive GIST) and (b) compare the within-subject results for WL and intensive GIST. Design
Randomized controlled trial with WL and repeated measures (pre- and posttraining, 3- and 6-month follow-ups). Setting
Community and rehabilitation hospital. Participants
Forty-nine persons (27-74 years) with ABI and social communication difficulties (26.5% traumatic brain injury, 44.9% stroke, 28.6% other), minimum 12 months postinjury. Intervention
Standard GIST (n=24) consisted of 12 weekly outpatient interactive group sessions (2.5 hours/session) and follow-up. Intensive GIST (n=18) consisted of 4 weeks with daily 4-hour inpatient group sessions (2 × 3 d/wk, 2 × 4 d/wk) and follow-up. Main Outcome Measures
La Trobe Questionnaire, a self-report questionnaire measuring social communication. Secondary measures: Social Communication Skills Questionnaire–Adapted, Goal Attainment Scale, Mind in the Eyes test, and questionnaires addressing mental and cognitive health, self-efficacy, and quality of life. Results
When comparing the standard GIST and WL results, a trend of improvement was found for the main outcome, La Trobe Questionnaire, and a statistically significant improvement was found for the secondary outcome Social Communication Skills Questionnaire–Adapted. Comparing standard GIST and intensive GIST, improvement in social communication skills after both treatments was detected and maintained at 6-month follow-up. No statistically significant difference was found between groups. Goal attainment was achieved and maintained during follow-up for both standard and intensive GIST. Conclusions
Social communication skills were improved after both standard and intensive GIST, indicating that GIST can be delivered across treatment formats and to a wider ABI population.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI