作者
Rakhi Maiwall,Salvatore Piano,Virendra Singh,Paolo Caraceni,Carlo Alessandria,Javier Fernández,Elza Cotrim Soares,Dong Joon Kim,Sung Eun Kim,Mónica Marino,Julio Vorobioff,R. de Cassia Ribeiro Barea,Manuela Merli,Laure Elkrief,Vı́ctor Vargas,Aleksander Krag,Shivaram Prasad Singh,Laurentius A. Lesmana,Claudio Toledo,Sebastián Marciano,Xavier Verhelst,Florence Wong,Nicolas M. Intagliata,Liane Rabinowich,Luis Colombato,Sang Gyune Kim,Alexander L. Gerbes,François Durand,Juan Pablo Roblero,Kalyan Ram Bhamidimarri,M. V. Maevskaya,E Fassio,Hyoung Su Kim,Jae Seok Hwang,Pere Ginés,Tony Bruns,Adrián Gadano,Paolo Angeli,Shiv Kumar Sarin
摘要
Background: The administration of an appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment is essential in cirrhosis and severe bacterial infections. We aimed to investigate the predictors of clinical response of empirical antibiotic treatment in a prospective cohort of patients with cirrhosis and bacterial and fungal infections included in the International Club of Ascites “Global Study.” Methods: Patients hospitalized with cirrhosis and bacterial/fungal infection were prospectively enrolled at 46 centers. Clinical response to antibiotic treatment was defined according to changes in markers of infection/inflammation, vital signs, improvement of organ failure, and results of cultures. Results: From October 2015 to September 2016, 1302 patients were included at 46 centers. A clinical response was achieved in only 61% of cases. Independent predictors of lack of clinical response to empirical treatment were C-reactive protein (OR = 1.16; 95% CI = 1.02–1.31), blood leukocyte count (OR = 1.39;95% CI = 1.09–1.77), serum albumin (OR = 0.70; 95% CI = 0.55–0.88), nosocomial infections (OR = 1.96; 95% CI = 1.20–2.38), pneumonia (OR = 1.75; 95% CI = 1.22–2.53), and ineffective treatment according to antibiotic susceptibility test (OR = 5.32; 95% CI = 3.47–8.57). Patients with a lack of clinical response to first-line antibiotic treatment had a significantly lower resolution rate of infections (55% vs. 96%; p < 0.001), a higher incidence of second infections (29% vs. 15%; p < 0.001), shock (35% vs. 7%; p < 0.001) and new organ failures (52% vs. 19 %; p < 0.001) than responders. Clinical response to empirical treatment was an independent predictor of 28-day survival ( subdistribution = 0.20; 95% CI = 0.14–0.27). Conclusions: Four out of 10 patients with cirrhosis do not respond to the first-line antibiotic therapy, leading to lower resolution of infections and higher mortality. Broader-spectrum antibiotics and strategies targeting systemic inflammation may improve prognosis in patients with a high degree of inflammation, low serum albumin levels, and severe liver impairment.