作者
Daniel E. Weiner,Cynthia Delgado,Jennifer E. Flythe,Derek Forfang,Thomas Manley,Lisa J. McGonigal,Elizabeth McNamara,Heather M. Murphy,Jesse L. Roach,Suzanne Watnick,Eric D. Weinhandl,Kerry Willis,Jeffrey S. Berns,Michael A. Aragon,Donna Bednarski,Aja Best,Robert Blaser,C. Barrett Bowling,Catherine R. Butler,Mary Beth Callahan,Chris Chan,Stephanie Clark,Sasha Couch,Deidra C. Crews,Stanley Crittenden,Lisa Custer,Kelli Collins Damron,Patty Danielson,Erich P. Ditschman,Stephan Dunning,Dawn P. Edwards,Matthew Fitting,Nieltje Gedney,Golden M. Horton,Bernard G. Jaar,Haley Jensen,Kirsten L. Johansen,Jessica Joseph,Eugene Lin,Frank Liu,Kevin Longino,Siddhartha Mazumdar,Mallika L. Mendu,Sumit Mohan,Erin O’Rourke,Paul M. Palevsky,Shika Pappoe,Sharon Pearce,Amber Pettis,Morgan Reid,Matthew B. Rivara,Glenda V. Roberts,Michael Rocco,Tonya L. Saffer,Dori Schatell,Jane O. Schell,Jennifer S. Scherer,Beth Shanaman,Michaël Somers,Robert Joseph Taylor,Francesca Tentori,Sri Lekha Tummalapalli,Mark Unruh,Brad Warady,David L. White,Gail Wick,Caroline Wilkie
摘要
Providing high-quality patient-centered care is the central mission of dialysis facilities. Assessing quality and patient-centeredness of dialysis care is necessary for continuous dialysis facility improvement. Based predominantly on readily measured items, current quality measures in dialysis care emphasize biochemical and utilization outcomes, with very few patient-reported items. Additionally, current metrics often do not account for patient preferences and may compromise patient-centered care by limiting the ability of providers to individualize care targets, such as dialysis adequacy, based on patient priorities rather than a fixed numerical target. Developing, implementing, and maintaining a quality program using readily quantifiable data while also allowing for individualization of care targets that emphasize the goals of patients and their care partners provided the motivation for a September 2022 Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) Workshop on Patient-Centered Quality Measures for Dialysis Care. Workshop participants focused on 4 questions: (1) What are the outcomes that are most important to patients and their care partners? (2) How can social determinants of health be accounted for in quality measures? (3) How can individualized care be effectively addressed in population-level quality programs? (4) What are the optimal means for collecting valid and robust patient-reported outcome data? Workshop participants identified numerous gaps within the current quality system and favored a conceptually broader, but not larger, quality system that stresses highly meaningful and adaptive measures that incorporate patient-centered principles, individual life goals, and social risk factors. Workshop participants also identified a need for new, low-burden tools to assess patient goals and priorities. Providing high-quality patient-centered care is the central mission of dialysis facilities. Assessing quality and patient-centeredness of dialysis care is necessary for continuous dialysis facility improvement. Based predominantly on readily measured items, current quality measures in dialysis care emphasize biochemical and utilization outcomes, with very few patient-reported items. Additionally, current metrics often do not account for patient preferences and may compromise patient-centered care by limiting the ability of providers to individualize care targets, such as dialysis adequacy, based on patient priorities rather than a fixed numerical target. Developing, implementing, and maintaining a quality program using readily quantifiable data while also allowing for individualization of care targets that emphasize the goals of patients and their care partners provided the motivation for a September 2022 Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) Workshop on Patient-Centered Quality Measures for Dialysis Care. Workshop participants focused on 4 questions: (1) What are the outcomes that are most important to patients and their care partners? (2) How can social determinants of health be accounted for in quality measures? (3) How can individualized care be effectively addressed in population-level quality programs? (4) What are the optimal means for collecting valid and robust patient-reported outcome data? Workshop participants identified numerous gaps within the current quality system and favored a conceptually broader, but not larger, quality system that stresses highly meaningful and adaptive measures that incorporate patient-centered principles, individual life goals, and social risk factors. Workshop participants also identified a need for new, low-burden tools to assess patient goals and priorities.