Target trial emulation using cohort studies: estimating the effect of antihypertensive medication initiation on incident dementia

医学 痴呆 混淆 置信区间 内科学 队列研究 队列 倾向得分匹配 随机对照试验 观察研究 临床试验 物理疗法 疾病
作者
Erin E. Bennett,Chelsea Liu,Emma K. Stapp,Kan Z. Gianattasio,Scott C. Zimmerman,Jingkai Wei,Michael Griswold,Sara Hägg,Rebecca F. Gottesman,Claudine Berr,B. Gwen Windham,Deborah A. Levine,Alison E. Fohner,M. Maria Glymour,Melinda C. Power
出处
期刊:Epidemiology [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
标识
DOI:10.1097/ede.0000000000001802
摘要

Background: Observational studies link high midlife systolic blood pressure to increased dementia risk. However, synthesis of evidence from randomized controlled trials has not definitively demonstrated that antihypertensive medication use reduces dementia risk. Here, we emulate target trials of antihypertensive medication initiation on incident dementia using three cohort studies, with attention to potential violations of necessary assumptions. Methods: We emulated trials of antihypertensive medication initiation on incident dementia using data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study, Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS), and Health and Retirement Study (HRS). We used data-driven methods to restrict participants to initiators and non-initiators with overlap in propensity scores and positive control outcomes to look for violations of positivity and exchangeability assumptions. Results: Analyses were limited by the small number of cohort participants who met eligibility criteria. Associations between antihypertensive medication initiation and incident dementia were inconsistent and imprecise (ARIC: HR = 0.30 [0.05, 1.93]; CHS: HR = 0.66 [0.27, 1.64]; HRS: HR = 1.09 [0.75, 1.59]). More stringent propensity score restriction had little effect on findings. Sensitivity analyses using a positive control outcome unexpectedly suggested antihypertensive medication initiation increased risk of coronary heart disease in all three samples. Conclusions: Positive control outcome analyses suggested substantial residual confounding in effect estimates from our target trials, precluding conclusions about the impact of antihypertensive medication initiation on dementia risk through target trial emulation. Formalized processes for identifying violations of necessary assumptions will strengthen confidence in target trial emulation and avoid inappropriate confidence in emulated trial results.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
新陈发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
鸢尾完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
小火龙发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
石友瑶发布了新的文献求助20
2秒前
derrrrrsin发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
隐形曼青应助个性竺采纳,获得10
4秒前
韦威风发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
魔幻的向松完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
科目三应助哈哈哈哈哈哈采纳,获得10
6秒前
王子语完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
秦贝贝发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
丫丫完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
pf发布了新的文献求助20
8秒前
Yc_完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
LiuJinhui发布了新的文献求助30
9秒前
研友_Z7Xvl8发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
derrrrrsin完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
幸福代灵完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
杜凯兴完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
源源完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
Viv发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
13秒前
赘婿应助hannuannuan采纳,获得10
14秒前
韦威风完成签到,获得积分20
15秒前
幸福代灵发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
18秒前
顾矜应助壮观的梦易采纳,获得10
20秒前
车念波完成签到,获得积分20
22秒前
wy1874870537发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
乐乐应助KID采纳,获得10
22秒前
24秒前
澈千子完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
LiuJinhui完成签到,获得积分20
25秒前
26秒前
共享精神应助耳东采纳,获得10
26秒前
27秒前
NPC-CBI完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
高分求助中
Exploring Mitochondrial Autophagy Dysregulation in Osteosarcoma: Its Implications for Prognosis and Targeted Therapy 4000
Impact of Mitophagy-Related Genes on the Diagnosis and Development of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma via Single-Cell RNA-seq Analysis and Machine Learning Algorithms 2000
Migration and Wellbeing: Towards a More Inclusive World 1200
How to Create Beauty: De Lairesse on the Theory and Practice of Making Art 1000
Evolution 1000
Gerard de Lairesse : an artist between stage and studio 670
On the Refined Urban Stormwater Modeling 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 材料科学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 免疫学 细胞生物学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2969411
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2631972
关于积分的说明 7090374
捐赠科研通 2265439
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1201378
版权声明 591450
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 587482