Long-term outcomes after catheter-based renal artery denervation for resistant hypertension: final follow-up of the randomised SYMPLICITY HTN-3 Trial

医学 去神经支配 血压 肾动脉 动态血压 肾交感神经失神经 回廊的 导管 临床终点 心脏病学 利尿剂 内科学 外科 随机对照试验 麻醉 抵抗性高血压
作者
Deepak L. Bhatt,Muthiah Vaduganathan,David E. Kandzari,Martin B. Leon,Krishna J. Rocha‐Singh,Raymond R. Townsend,Barry T. Katzen,Suzanne Oparil,Sandeep Brar,Vanessa DeBruin,Martin Fahy,George L. Bakris,Deepak L. Bhatt,George L. Bakris,Sidney A. Cohen,Ralph B. D’Agostino,Murray Esler,John M. Flack,David E. Kandzari,Barry T. Katzen
出处
期刊:The Lancet [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:400 (10361): 1405-1416 被引量:173
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01787-1
摘要

Summary

Background

The SYMPLICITY HTN-3 (Renal Denervation in Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension) trial showed the safety but not efficacy of the Symplicity system (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) at 6 months follow-up in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension. This final report presents the 36-month follow-up results.

Methods

SYMPLICITY HTN-3 was a single-blind, multicentre, sham-controlled, randomised clinical trial, done in 88 centres in the USA. Adults aged 18–80 years, with treatment-resistant hypertension on stable, maximally tolerated doses of three or more drugs including a diuretic, who had a seated office systolic blood pressure of 160 mm Hg or more and 24 h ambulatory systolic blood pressure of 135 mm Hg or more were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive renal artery denervation using the single electrode (Flex) catheter or a sham control. The original primary endpoint was the change in office systolic blood pressure from baseline to 6 months for the renal artery denervation group compared with the sham control group. Patients were unmasked after the primary endpoint assessment at 6 months, at which point eligible patients in the sham control group who met the inclusion criteria (office blood pressure ≥160 mm Hg, 24 h ambulatory systolic blood pressure ≥135 mm Hg, and still prescribed three or more antihypertensive medications) could cross over to receive renal artery denervation. Changes in blood pressure up to 36 months were analysed in patients in the original renal artery denervation group and sham control group, including those who underwent renal artery denervation after 6 months (crossover group) and those who did not (non-crossover group). For comparisons between the renal artery denervation and sham control groups, follow-up blood pressure values were imputed for patients in the crossover group using their most recent pre-crossover masked blood pressure value. We report long-term blood pressure changes in renal artery denervation and sham control groups, and investigate blood pressure control in both groups using time in therapeutic blood pressure range analysis. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of all-cause mortality, end stage renal disease, significant embolic event, renal artery perforation or dissection requiring intervention, vascular complications, hospitalisation for hypertensive crisis unrelated to non-adherence to medications, or new renal artery stenosis of more than 70% within 6 months. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01418261.

Findings

From Sep 29, 2011, to May 6, 2013, 1442 patients were screened, of whom 535 (37%; 210 [39%] women and 325 [61%] men; mean age 57·9 years [SD 10·7]) were randomly assigned: 364 (68%) patients received renal artery denervation (mean age 57·9 years [10·4]) and 171 (32%) received the sham control (mean age 56·2 years [11·2]). 36-month follow-up data were available for 219 patients (original renal artery denervation group), 63 patients (crossover group), and 33 patients (non-crossover group). At 36 months, the change in office systolic blood pressure was –26·4 mm Hg (SD 25·9) in the renal artery denervation group and –5·7 mm Hg (24·4) in the sham control group (adjusted treatment difference –22·1 mm Hg [95% CI –27·2 to –17·0]; p≤0·0001). The change in 24 h ambulatory systolic blood pressure at 36 months was –15·6 mm Hg (SD 20·8) in the renal artery denervation group and –0·3 mm Hg (15·1) in the sham control group (adjusted treatment difference –16·5 mm Hg [95% CI –20·5 to –12·5]; p≤0·0001). Without imputation, the renal artery denervation group spent a significantly longer time in therapeutic blood pressure range (ie, better blood pressure control) than patients in the sham control group (18% [SD 25·0] for the renal artery denervation group vs 9% [SD 18·8] for the sham control group; p≤0·0001) despite a similar medication burden, with consistent and significant results with imputation. Rates of adverse events were similar across treatment groups, with no evidence of late-emerging complications from renal artery denervation. The rate of the composite safety endpoint to 48 months, including all-cause death, new-onset end-stage renal disease, significant embolic event resulting in end-organ damage, vascular complication, renal artery re-intervention, and hypertensive emergency was 15% (54 of 352 patients) for the renal artery denervation group, 14% (13 of 96 patients) for the crossover group, and 14% (10 of 69 patients) for the non-crossover group.

Interpretation

This final report of the SYMPLICITY HTN-3 trial adds to the totality of evidence supporting the safety of renal artery denervation to 36 months after the procedure. From 12 months to 36 months after the procedure, patients who were originally randomly assigned to receive renal artery denervation had larger reductions in blood pressure and better blood pressure control compared with patients who received sham control.

Funding

Medtronic
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
所所应助Jerry采纳,获得10
刚刚
shmily13333完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
u2u2完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
cldg完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
ruychou完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
南溪完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
yckbz完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
pengyang完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
Cheese完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
5秒前
maz123456完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
cx发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
世界小奇完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
tudouni发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
wayne完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
tangpc完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
彭于晏应助毛绒绒窝铺采纳,获得10
6秒前
7秒前
乘云去发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
漠尘完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
不敢装睡完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
CC发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
文清发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
追寻道天完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
感性的穆完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
凌慕完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
wade发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
高大靖仇发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
王冉冉完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
flj7038完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
高分求助中
Adhesion Science: Principles & Practice 1234
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Introduction to Cosmetic Formulation and Technology, 2nd Edition 400
Petrology and Plate Tectonics,2025 400
Burger's Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery 400
Programming for Chemical Engineers Using C, C++, and MATLAB 320
Birth of Twins After Genome Editing for HIV Resistance 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6690130
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8433754
关于积分的说明 18018474
捐赠科研通 5916869
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2984584
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1960542
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1899111