Causality between insulin use and malignant tumors of the digestive system: a two-sample mendelian randomized study

孟德尔随机化 医学 单核苷酸多态性 全基因组关联研究 胰岛素 内科学 肿瘤科 多效性 遗传关联 生物信息学 遗传学 生物 基因型 遗传变异 基因 表型
作者
DengZhuo Chen,Yongli Ma,JingHui Li,Liang Wen,Guosheng Zhang,Cheng Zhi Huang,Xueqing Yao
出处
期刊:BMC Cancer [Springer Nature]
卷期号:25 (1)
标识
DOI:10.1186/s12885-025-13452-1
摘要

Existing cohort studies show no association between insulin use and cancers of the digestive system, while numerous meta-analyses suggest that insulin use increases the risk of digestive system tumours. This study uses two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) to further investigate the causal relationship between the two. We selected single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) strongly associated with insulin use as instrumental variables and used aggregated statistics on digestive system neoplasms as the outcome event. The primary method of analysis was inverse variance weighting (IVW), supplemented by weighted median, MR-Egger regression, weighted mode and simple mode methods. The reliability of the study was assessed by heterogeneity testing, pleiotropy analysis and sensitivity analysis. A total of 8 SNPs associated with insulin use were included as instrumental variables. Random-effects IVW analysis showed an association between insulin use and increased risk of colorectal cancer (OR = 1.1037, 95%CI = 1.0183–1.1962, P = 0.016). No statistically significant association was found between insulin use and the development of other digestive system tumours. The results were unaffected by pleiotropy and heterogeneity, and the reliability of the findings was confirmed by sensitivity analysis. Our Mendelian randomization study suggests an association between insulin use and an increased risk of CRC, with no clear association observed for other digestive system tumours. However, further MR studies with larger sample sizes from genome-wide association study (GWAS) data are needed to verify this association.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
momo发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
低空飞行发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
佛人世间完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
空白发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
韩小柒发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
Stella应助美好斓采纳,获得30
1秒前
乐观的海发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
JamesPei应助Ethan采纳,获得10
1秒前
健忘的灵槐完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
yiyi完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
浮游应助西海焖面采纳,获得10
3秒前
Wency应助大聪明采纳,获得10
4秒前
科研通AI6应助张张采纳,获得10
4秒前
共享精神应助wxwx采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
科研通AI2S应助WQY采纳,获得10
6秒前
zhuxl发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
归尘发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
Sukey完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
852应助自由的筮采纳,获得30
6秒前
李健应助科研小白采纳,获得10
7秒前
林小林完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
王哒哒发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
大胆的忆雪完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
热心的惜珊完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
LQ完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
jj发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
负责的凌波应助可以理解采纳,获得10
10秒前
yu完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
高分求助中
Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science Third edition 2025 12000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Social Work Ethics Casebook: Cases and Commentary (revised 2nd ed.). Frederic G. Reamer 800
Beyond the sentence : discourse and sentential form / edited by Jessica R. Wirth 600
Holistic Discourse Analysis 600
Vertébrés continentaux du Crétacé supérieur de Provence (Sud-Est de la France) 600
Vertebrate Palaeontology, 5th Edition 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5338063
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4475255
关于积分的说明 13927762
捐赠科研通 4370404
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2401288
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1394381
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1366206