医学
近距离放射治疗
吉西他滨
宫颈癌
外照射放疗
淋巴结
泌尿科
阶段(地层学)
放化疗
核医学
根治性子宫切除术
临床研究阶段
顺铂
放射治疗
癌症
放射科
化疗
外科
内科学
古生物学
生物
作者
Lucely Cetina,Aarón González-Enciso,David Cantú,Jaime Coronel,Delia Pérez-Montiel,José Hinojosa,A. Serrano,Lina María Saldarriaga Rivera,Adela Poitevin,A. Mota,E. Trejo,G. Montalvo,Daniel Muñoz,Juan Ubaldo Robles-Flores,Jaime de la Garza,J. Chanona,R. Jiménez-Lima,Thomas Wegman,Alfonso Dueñas‐González
标识
DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdt142
摘要
The aim of the present study was to demonstrate that radical hysterectomy (RH) leads to improved survival outcomes in FIGO stage IB2-IIB cervical cancer when compared with standard brachytherapy (BCT) after identical external beam chemoradiation (EBRT-CT).EBRT-CT treatment consisted of six courses of cisplatin at 40 mg/m² and gemcitabine at 125 mg/m² per week concurrent with 50.4 Gy of radiation. In the BCT arm, EBRT-CT was followed by BCT to reach a point A dose of 85 Gy, whereas in the experimental arm, a type III RH with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection and para-aortic lymph node sampling (RH) was carried out within 4-6 weeks after EBRT-CT.Between May 2004 and June 2009, 211 patients were enrolled (BCT, 100 and RH, 111). At a median follow-up time of 36 months (3-80), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were similar in both the arms. PFS rates were 74.8% and 71.7% in the BCT and RH arms [HR 0.6516 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.3504-1.2116)], P = 0.186. OS rates were 76.3% in the BCT versus 74.5% in the surgical arm [HR 0.6981 (95% CI 0.3106-1.3439)], P = 0.236. No differences were observed in the pattern of local and systemic failures.This study failed to demonstrate that RH after EBRT-CT is superior to standard BCT.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI