Measures of quality, costs and equity in primary health care instruments developed to analyse and compare primary care in 35 countries.

衡平法 联营 质量(理念) 医疗保健 医学 家庭医学 医学教育 护理部 心理学 计算机科学 政治学 哲学 认识论 人工智能 法学
作者
Willemijn Schäfer,W.G.W. Boerma,Dionne Kringos,Evelyne De Ryck,Stefan Greß,Stephanie Heinemann,Anna Maria Murante,Danica Rotar Pavlič,François Schellevis,Chiara Seghieri,Michael J. van den Berg,Gert P. Westert,Sara Willems,Peter Groenewegen
出处
期刊:PubMed 卷期号:21 (2): 67-79 被引量:130
链接
标识
摘要

The Quality and Costs of Primary Care in Europe (QUALICOPC) study aims to analyse and compare how primary health care systems in 35 countries perform in terms of quality, costs and equity. This article answers the question 'How can the organisation and delivery of primary health care and its outcomes be measured through surveys of general practitioners (GPs) and patients?' It will also deal with the process of pooling questions and the subsequent development and application of exclusion criteria to arrive at a set of appropriate questions for a broad international comparative study.The development of the questionnaires consisted of four phases: a search for existing validated questionnaires, the classification and selection of relevant questions, shortening of the questionnaires in three consensus rounds and the pilot survey. Consensus was reached on the basis of exclusion criteria (e.g. the applicability for international comparison). Based on the pilot survey, comprehensibility increased and the number of questions was further restricted, as the questionnaires were too long.Four questionnaires were developed: one for GPs, one for patients about their experiences with their GP, another for patients about what they consider important, and a practice questionnaire. The GP questionnaire mainly focused on the structural aspects (e.g. economic conditions) and care processes (e.g. comprehensiveness of services of primary care). The patient experiences questionnaire focused on the care processes and outcomes (e.g. how do patients experience access to care?). The questionnaire about what patients consider important was complementary to the experiences questionnaire, as it enabled weighing the answers from the latter. Finally, the practice questionnaire included questions on practice characteristics.The QUALICOPC researchers have developed four questionnaires to characterise the organisation and delivery of primary health care and to compare and analyse the outcomes. Data collected with these instruments will allow us not only to show in detail the variation in process and outcomes of primary health care, but also to explain the differences from features of the (primary) health care system.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
韩小花完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
2秒前
2秒前
宜醉宜游宜睡应助子咸采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
Dan应助zzz采纳,获得10
5秒前
cxh完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
肖子轩发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
睡觉睡觉发布了新的文献求助30
8秒前
10秒前
11秒前
Owen应助pxj采纳,获得30
12秒前
麦客完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
PPPP发布了新的文献求助20
14秒前
zzz完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
pupeij6发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
keyanzhang完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
天边外完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
pxj完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
潇洒的凝阳完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
麦田里的守望者完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
肖子轩关注了科研通微信公众号
22秒前
西宁完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
pxj发布了新的文献求助30
25秒前
酷波er应助禹宛白采纳,获得10
25秒前
淡淡的小蜜蜂完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
listener完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
在水一方应助sylviawj采纳,获得10
28秒前
wanci应助Yan采纳,获得10
28秒前
29秒前
30秒前
31秒前
小峰峰完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
31秒前
高分求助中
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2500
Востребованный временем 2500
Agaricales of New Zealand 1: Pluteaceae - Entolomataceae 1040
지식생태학: 생태학, 죽은 지식을 깨우다 600
海南省蛇咬伤流行病学特征与预后影响因素分析 500
Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine Board Review 500
ランス多機能化技術による溶鋼脱ガス処理の高効率化の研究 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 材料科学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 纳米技术 内科学 物理 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 细胞生物学 免疫学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3461413
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3055059
关于积分的说明 9046383
捐赠科研通 2744996
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1505792
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 695820
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 695281