单克隆抗体病
罗氏诊断公司
单克隆
一致性
多克隆抗体
医学
内科学
单克隆抗体
免疫学
抗原
抗体
作者
Anne-Sophie Messiaen,Maxime M. W. De Sloovere,Paul-Emile Claus,Martine Vercammen,Lieve Van Hoovels,Olivier Heylen,Johan Debrabandere,Hilde Vanpoucke,Dieter De Smet
出处
期刊:American Journal of Clinical Pathology
[Oxford University Press]
日期:2017-02-16
卷期号:147 (6): 611-622
被引量:25
摘要
Free light chain (FLC) measurement gained a lot of interest for diagnostic workup of monoclonal gammopathy. We evaluated the performance of turbidimetric polyclonal Freelite (The Binding Site, Birmingham, UK) assays on Cobas 6000 (Roche Diagnostics, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) and nephelometric monoclonal N Latex (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Marburg, Germany) assays on BN ProSpec (Dade Behring, Deerfield, IL) vs established nephelometric Freelite assays on BN ProSpec. Analytical performance was acceptable. Method comparison (n = 118) showed significant proportional FLC differences for N Latex assays. However, good correlation and clinical concordance were shown. Recovery study in the low concentration range demonstrated consistent over- and underrecovery for Freelite reagents, hampering future research on prognostic value of suppressed noninvolved FLC. Antigen excess detection was successful for κ FLC in three-fourths of cases with Freelite reagents and in all cases with N Latex reagents. However, the latter resulted in underestimated κ FLC concentrations. FLC analysis requires continuous awareness of analytical limitations. Monitoring of disease response requires FLC analysis on the same platform using the same reagents.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI