无氧运动
乳酸阈
血乳酸
最大VO2
动物科学
方差分析
单调的工作
刺激(心理学)
运行经济
医学
物理疗法
内科学
心理学
心率
生物
血压
心理治疗师
作者
Jared Hornsby,Matt Green
出处
期刊:Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:2011-05-01
卷期号:43 (5): 779-779
标识
DOI:10.1249/01.mss.0000402167.55759.de
摘要
PURPOSE: This study compared VO2 max, lactate threshold (LT) and VO2 at LT (VO2LT) among aerobic athletes (ARA) (n=10), anaerobic athletes (ANA) (n=9) and untrained subjects (UTS) (n=7). METHODS: From a treadmill test to exhaustion, VO2 max and LT (4 mmol·L-1 blood lactate concentration) were assessed. RESULTS: Table 1 presents comparison among groups. Values presented are means and standard deviations. ANOVA's showed VO2 max (ml·kg-1·min-1) was significantly greater for ARA than ANA and UTS, with ANA significantly greater than UTS. LT for ARA was not significantly different than ANA. However, ARA and ANA were significantly greater than UTS. VO2LT (ml·kg-1·min-1) was significantly greater for ARA and ANA than for UTS with ANA significantly greater than UTS. CONCLUSIONS: Although used to establish groups, VO2 max for ARA (vs. UTS) reflect aerobic training adaptations. Similarly high LT would be expected in ARA. Modest VO2 max for ANA reflects only a mild stimulus to oxidative pathways (plausibly occurring during recovery from repeated high-intensity efforts). However, anaerobic training appears to provide a stimulus adequate to increase LT. Elevated LT with moderate changes in VO2 max for ANA provide indirect evidence that differential mechanisms alter VO2 max and LT. Still, VO2 at LT may have the greatest implication with regards to aerobic performance. From a practical standpoint, coaches/trainers should consider the impact of anaerobic training on LT. Future research should more directly examine threshold-altering mechanisms between these groups of athletes.Table
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI