医学
磺胺甲恶唑
危险系数
甲氧苄啶
置信区间
内科学
治疗药物监测
毒性
胃肠病学
比例危险模型
嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌
优势比
抗生素
药代动力学
微生物学
生物
细菌
遗传学
铜绿假单胞菌
作者
Lauren L. Ice,Jason N. Barreto,Bao Dao,Robert Christian Wolf,Ross Dierkhising,Paul J. Jannetto,Loralie J. Langman,Pritish K. Tosh
出处
期刊:Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:2016-02-02
卷期号:38 (3): 319-326
被引量:21
标识
DOI:10.1097/ftd.0000000000000282
摘要
Background: Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) is the treatment of choice for infections caused by Pneumocystis jiroveci, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Nocardia species, but the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between peak sulfamethoxazole (SMX) serum levels and clinical outcomes to determine the utility of TDM of TMP/SMX. Methods: This study was conducted in patients receiving treatment with TMP/SMX for culture-positive infection who underwent TDM from 2003 to 2013. Peak SMX levels were classified as below target (<100 mcg/mL), within target (100–150 mcg/mL), or above target (>150 mcg/mL). The effect of initial SMX levels on clinical outcomes was compared using propensity score adjusted multivariable Cox models. Results: A total of 279 patients had SMX monitoring performed. The primary infecting organisms were P. jiroveci (47%) and S. maltophilia (38%). A majority of patients (74%) had an SMX peak level outside of the target range. Using direct regression propensity score adjustment, there was no significant difference between rates of clinical failure and initial peak SMX level (<100 mcg/mL versus 100–150 mcg/mL: hazard ratio 0.92, 95% confidence interval, 0.28–3.07 and >150 mcg/mL versus 100–150 mcg/mL: hazard ratio 1.92, 95% confidence interval, 0.72–5.09). Similarly, there was no relationship between SMX level and toxicity (P = 0.42). Conclusions: Sulfamethoxazole serum levels outside the target range were not associated with increased rates of clinical failure in patients treated with TMP/SMX. There was also no association found between peak SMX levels and rates of adverse events. Although this study cannot disprove that dose adjustments after the initial SMX peak level may have affected clinical outcomes, the results suggest that the utility of SMX TDM may be limited to a subset of patients and requires further prospective investigation.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI