活力测定
生物陶瓷
矿物三氧化物骨料
生物医学工程
材料科学
胶原酶
牙科
男科
分子生物学
细胞
化学
生物
医学
生物化学
纳米技术
酶
作者
Gustavo De‐Deus,Antônio Canabarro,Gutemberg Gomes Alves,Juliana Marins,Adriana Linhares,José Mauro Granjeiro
标识
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.02003.x
摘要
De‐Deus G, Canabarro A, Alves GG, Marins JR, Linhares ABR, Granjeiro JM. Cytocompatibility of the ready‐to‐use bioceramic putty repair cement iRoot BP Plus with primary human osteoblasts. International Endodontic Journal , 45 , 508–513, 2012. Abstract Aim To verify the in vitro cytocompatibility of iRoot BP Plus (iRoot) and to compare it with White ProRoot MTA (MTA). Methodology Thirty‐six human maxillary incisor root canals were prepared using a step‐back flaring technique. The apical 3 mm was resected perpendicular to the long axis at the roots, and root‐end cavities were prepared with the aid of an ultrasonic device plus a diamond retrotip with continuous irrigation using water, producing standardized preparations. After that, the root‐end cavities were filled with iRoot or MTA, and each root was exposed to cell culture media for 24 or 48 h. Human osteoblast cells were exposed to the extracts thus obtained, and a multiparametric cell viability assay was performed, evaluating mitochondrial activity, membrane integrity and cell density. The results were analysed by one‐way analysis of variance, complemented with the Duncan post‐test ( P < 0.05). Results Cells exposed to MTA revealed a cytocompatibility pattern similar to the untreated cells (negative control), at both experimental times ( P > 0.05). iRoot, however, promoted a significantly poorer viability than MTA and the control, after 48 h of exposure ( P < 0.001). Nevertheless, iRoot did not induce critical cytotoxic effects because cell viability remained higher than 70% of the control group in most tests performed. Conclusion iRoot and MTA were biocompatible and did not induce critical cytotoxic effects.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI