医学
肾细胞癌
子群分析
全身疗法
免疫疗法
肾切除术
比例危险模型
内科学
泌尿科
肿瘤科
外科
肾
癌症
乳腺癌
置信区间
作者
Kosuke Takemura,Matthew Scott Ernst,Vishal Navani,J. Connor Wells,Ziad Bakouny,Frede Donskov,Naveen S. Basappa,Lori Wood,Luís Meza,Sumanta K. Pal,Bernadett Szabados,Thomas Powles,Benoit Beuselinck,Rana R. McKay,Jae‐Lyun Lee,D. Scott Ernst,Anil Kapoor,Takeshi Yuasa,Toni K. Choueiri,Daniel Y.C. Heng
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.euo.2023.10.002
摘要
Background The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) has not yet been well characterized in the era of combination immunotherapy. Objective To evaluate characteristics and outcomes for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who received immuno-oncology (IO)-based combination therapy according to CN status. Design, setting, and participants Using the International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC), patients with mRCC who received frontline IO-based combinations were included. Upfront CN was defined as CN up to 3 mo before diagnosis of metastatic disease but before systemic therapy initiation. Deferred CN was defined as CN after systemic therapy initiation. Outcomes measurements and statistical analysis Overall survival (OS) from initiation of systemic therapy was estimated via Cox proportional-hazards regression. A 12-mo landmark time and a time-varying covariate for CN status were used to mitigate potential bias. Results and limitations Of the 385 patients eligible for landmark analysis, 24, 182, and 179 underwent deferred CN, upfront CN, and no CN, respectively. Patients in the no CN subgroup were older (63 yr vs 57 yr in the deferred CN subgroup and 60 yr in the upfront CN subgroup; p = 0.001) and a higher proportion had bone metastases (44% vs 26% in the deferred CN subgroup and 23% in the upfront CN subgroup; p < 0.001). A lower proportion of patients in the upfront CN subgroup had IMDC poor risk (23% vs 43% in the no CN subgroup and 47% in the deferred CN subgroup; p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, CN receipt was an independent favorable prognostic factor (hazard ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.26–0.78; p = 0.005). The study is limited by the lack of randomization and its retrospective nature. Conclusions Despite changes in practice patterns with the advent of novel therapeutic agents, CN may still serve as an effective surgical intervention in carefully selected patients. Patient summary For patients with metastatic kidney cancer, surgery to remove the primary tumor was traditionally the treatment of choice, but immunotherapy drugs are now another option for these patients. We analyzed data for contemporary patients with metastatic kidney cancer who received combination immunotherapy as their first treatment. We found that in selected patients receiving immunotherapy, surgery to remove the primary tumor as well can result in better prognosis.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI