Short, medium, and long deferral of umbilical cord clamping compared with umbilical cord milking and immediate clamping at preterm birth: a systematic review and network meta-analysis with individual participant data

医学 延期 优势比 脐带 荟萃分析 安慰剂 置信区间 可能性 产科 内科学 逻辑回归 替代医学 会计 病理 业务 解剖
作者
Anna Lene Seidler,Sol Libesman,Kylie E Hunter,Angie Barba,Mason Aberoumand,Jonathan G. Williams,Nipun Shrestha,Jannik Aagerup,James X. Sotiropoulos,Alan Montgomery,Gillian ML Gyte,Lelia Duley,Lisa Askie,Anna Lene Seidler,Sol Libesman,Kylie E Hunter,Angie Barba,Mason Aberoumand,Jonathan G. Williams,Nipun Shrestha
出处
期刊:The Lancet [Elsevier]
卷期号:402 (10418): 2223-2234 被引量:41
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(23)02469-8
摘要

Background Deferred (also known as delayed) cord clamping can improve survival of infants born preterm (before 37 weeks of gestation), but the optimal duration of deferral remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and individual participant data network meta-analysis with the aim of comparing the effectiveness of umbilical cord clamping strategies with different timings of clamping or with cord milking for preterm infants. Methods We searched medical databases and trial registries from inception until Feb 24, 2022 (updated June 6, 2023) for randomised controlled trials comparing cord clamping strategies for preterm infants. Individual participant data were harmonised and assessed for risk of bias and quality. Interventions were grouped into immediate clamping, short deferral (≥15 s to <45 s), medium deferral (≥45 s to <120 s), long deferral (≥120 s), and intact cord milking. The primary outcome was death before hospital discharge. We calculated one-stage, intention-to-treat Bayesian random-effects individual participant data network meta-analysis. This study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42019136640. Findings We included individual participant data from 47 trials with 6094 participants. Of all interventions, long deferral reduced death before discharge the most (compared with immediate clamping; odds ratio 0·31 [95% credibility interval] 0·11–0·80; moderate certainty). The risk of bias was low for 10 (33%) of 30 trials, 14 (47%) had some concerns, and 6 (20%) were rated as having a high risk of bias. Heterogeneity was low, with no indication of inconsistency. Interpretation This study found that long deferral of clamping leads to reduced odds of death before discharge in preterm infants. In infants assessed as requiring immediate resuscitation, this finding might only be generalisable if there are provisions for such care with the cord intact. These results are based on thoroughly cleaned and checked individual participant data and can inform future guidelines and practice. Funding Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
体贴旭尧完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
呆萌的雅旋完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
斯文败类应助XXQ采纳,获得10
1秒前
2秒前
3秒前
小青椒应助刚刚采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
yan完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
1101592875应助一路硕博采纳,获得10
4秒前
棋士应助一路硕博采纳,获得10
4秒前
ZZQ完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
Jared应助一路硕博采纳,获得20
4秒前
无极微光应助一路硕博采纳,获得20
4秒前
共享精神应助麦当当薯条采纳,获得10
4秒前
YH关闭了YH文献求助
4秒前
无情南琴发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
打打应助文静采纳,获得10
5秒前
wjy发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
子涵高完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
6秒前
LINHY应助研友_8R5zBZ采纳,获得20
6秒前
7秒前
lijiao发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
小二郎应助hyominhsu采纳,获得10
8秒前
wanci应助无问采纳,获得10
8秒前
CKK应助maybe豪采纳,获得10
8秒前
yxy840325发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
Jackson完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Introduction to strong mixing conditions volume 1-3 5000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 2000
The Cambridge History of China: Volume 4, Sui and T'ang China, 589–906 AD, Part Two 1000
The Composition and Relative Chronology of Dynasties 16 and 17 in Egypt 1000
Real World Research, 5th Edition 800
Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo By Jenine Beekhuyzen, Pat Bazeley · 2024 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5718762
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5254117
关于积分的说明 15287024
捐赠科研通 4868786
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2614471
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1564338
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1521791