医学
冠状动脉钙
心脏病学
心房颤动
磁共振成像
冲程(发动机)
内科学
心脏磁共振
冠状动脉疾病
放射科
机械工程
工程类
作者
Morteza Naghavi,Anthony P. Reeves,Kyle Atlas,Chenyu Zhang,Di Li,Thomas Atlas,Claudia I. Henschke,Nathan D. Wong,Roy Sk,Matthew J. Budoff,David F. Yankelevitz
标识
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.2744
摘要
Abstract Background AI-CAC provides more actionable information than the Agatston coronary artery calcium (CAC) score. We have recently shown in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) that AI-CAC automated left atrial (LA) volumetry enabled prediction of atrial fibrillation (AF) as early as one year. In this study we evaluated the performance of AI-CAC LA volumetry versus LA measured by human experts using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) for predicting AF and stroke, and compared them with CHARGE-AF risk score, Agatston score, and NT-proBNP. Methods We used 15-year outcomes data from 3552 asymptomatic individuals (52.2% women, age 61.7±10.2 years) who underwent both CAC scans and CMRI in the MESA baseline examination. CMRI LA volume was previously measured by human experts. Data on BNP, CHARGE-AF risk score and the Agatston score were obtained from MESA. Discrimination was assessed using the time-dependent area under the curve (AUC). Results Over 15 years follow-up, 562 cases of AF and 140 cases of stroke accrued. The AUC for AI-CAC versus CMRI for AF and stroke were not significantly different (0.802 vs. 0.798 and 0.762 vs. 0.751 respectively, p=0.60). AI-CAC significantly improved the continuous Net Reclassification Index (NRI) for prediction of AF and stroke when added to CHARGE-AF risk score (0.28, 0.21), NT-proBNP (0.43, 0.37), and Agatston score (0.69, 0.41) respectively (p for all<0.0001). Conclusion AI-CAC automated LA volumetry and CMRI LA volume measured by human experts similarly predicted incident AF and stroke over 15 years. Further studies to investigate the clinical utility of AI-CAC for AF and stroke prediction are warranted.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI