Nursing students' experiences and perception of peer feedback: A qualitative systematic review

同行反馈 批判性评价 定性研究 团队合作 感觉 主题分析 课程 医学教育 护士教育 护理部 同伴学习 焦点小组 心理学 医学 教育学 社会心理学 社会科学 替代医学 病理 营销 社会学 政治学 法学 业务
作者
Bryan Wong,Shefaly Shorey
出处
期刊:Nurse Education Today [Elsevier]
卷期号:116: 105469-105469 被引量:13
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105469
摘要

Peer feedback is an effective learning tool for students, improving academic performance and learning satisfaction. In nursing education, it has been widely used in the assimilation of clinical skills. However, the effectiveness of peer feedback as an educational intervention needs to be evaluated holistically beyond intervention research, considering students' perception to garner valuable insights to guide the successful implementation of peer feedback.This review aimed to consolidate the qualitative evidence exploring perceptions and experiences of nursing students who have used peer feedback as a learning tool.Qualitative systematic review.Nine databases were searched from their respective inception dates until December 2021.Data were extracted using a modified Joanna Brigg's qualitative data extraction tool, and the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool was used to appraise the quality of included studies. Meta-synthesis was done using Sandelowski and Barroso's two-step approach.The review included 14 studies and the synthesis identified an overarching theme: 'feeling lost to finding ways' and four themes: (1) An uncomfortable learning experience; (2) confronting disagreements; (3) greater engagement with learning; and (4) value added beyond learning.The present review summed up the wide range of nursing students' experiences, from feeling inadequate and having little confidence in the usefulness of peer feedback to reaping valuable benefits in terms of teamwork and leadership skills. The nursing curriculum could include peer feedback; however peer students adequate training and support. Future research could focus on developing and evaluating preparatory programs to improve the learning experiences of nursing students using peer feedback.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
焦焦发布了新的文献求助80
刚刚
小江不饿发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
crx发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
小迪完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
我是老大应助OnlyHarbour采纳,获得10
5秒前
zh_li完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
cheng完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
NN应助李7采纳,获得20
6秒前
7秒前
pp完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
浮游应助壮观乘云采纳,获得10
8秒前
jun完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
嗯嗯应助王之争霸采纳,获得10
9秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
海南发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
晨晨发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
13秒前
缓慢尔岚发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
善良随阴完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
13秒前
奶白的雪子完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
星辰大海应助阿依咕噜采纳,获得10
15秒前
香蕉觅云应助DG采纳,获得10
15秒前
睡觉了完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
Y_Y完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
zorro3574发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
16秒前
16秒前
嘿嘿完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
renxin发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
2025-2031全球及中国金刚石触媒粉行业研究及十五五规划分析报告 6000
Real World Research, 5th Edition 680
Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo By Jenine Beekhuyzen, Pat Bazeley · 2024 660
Superabsorbent Polymers 600
Handbook of Migration, International Relations and Security in Asia 555
Between high and low : a chronology of the early Hellenistic period 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5675369
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4945575
关于积分的说明 15152710
捐赠科研通 4834585
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2589541
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1543247
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1501131