Nursing students' experiences and perception of peer feedback: A qualitative systematic review

同行反馈 批判性评价 定性研究 团队合作 感觉 主题分析 课程 医学教育 护士教育 护理部 同伴学习 焦点小组 心理学 医学 教育学 社会心理学 社会科学 替代医学 病理 营销 社会学 政治学 法学 业务
作者
Bryan Wong,Shefaly Shorey
出处
期刊:Nurse Education Today [Elsevier]
卷期号:116: 105469-105469 被引量:13
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105469
摘要

Peer feedback is an effective learning tool for students, improving academic performance and learning satisfaction. In nursing education, it has been widely used in the assimilation of clinical skills. However, the effectiveness of peer feedback as an educational intervention needs to be evaluated holistically beyond intervention research, considering students' perception to garner valuable insights to guide the successful implementation of peer feedback.This review aimed to consolidate the qualitative evidence exploring perceptions and experiences of nursing students who have used peer feedback as a learning tool.Qualitative systematic review.Nine databases were searched from their respective inception dates until December 2021.Data were extracted using a modified Joanna Brigg's qualitative data extraction tool, and the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool was used to appraise the quality of included studies. Meta-synthesis was done using Sandelowski and Barroso's two-step approach.The review included 14 studies and the synthesis identified an overarching theme: 'feeling lost to finding ways' and four themes: (1) An uncomfortable learning experience; (2) confronting disagreements; (3) greater engagement with learning; and (4) value added beyond learning.The present review summed up the wide range of nursing students' experiences, from feeling inadequate and having little confidence in the usefulness of peer feedback to reaping valuable benefits in terms of teamwork and leadership skills. The nursing curriculum could include peer feedback; however peer students adequate training and support. Future research could focus on developing and evaluating preparatory programs to improve the learning experiences of nursing students using peer feedback.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
1秒前
姜彦乔完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
rs发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
斯文败类应助诚心的听兰采纳,获得10
3秒前
5秒前
5秒前
现实的中心完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
一帆丿风顺完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
江睿曦发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
卢哲完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
9秒前
bkagyin应助体贴的手链采纳,获得10
9秒前
10秒前
无私的凌萱完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
wave发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
走着完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
大个应助xczhang2022采纳,获得10
11秒前
勤劳的蓝应助橡皮鸭队长采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
不知道完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
卢哲发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
13秒前
八段锦发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
wuqilong完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
科研通AI6.3应助LYF采纳,获得10
15秒前
朗明发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
迷迷糊糊发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
十二完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
饭神仙鱼发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
深情安青应助accerue采纳,获得10
16秒前
16秒前
江睿曦完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
可爱大炮完成签到,获得积分20
17秒前
吴糖气泡水关注了科研通微信公众号
17秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
Social Cognition: Understanding People and Events 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6025877
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7665444
关于积分的说明 16180370
捐赠科研通 5173774
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2768435
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1751777
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1637819