Nursing students' experiences and perception of peer feedback: A qualitative systematic review

同行反馈 批判性评价 定性研究 团队合作 感觉 主题分析 课程 医学教育 护士教育 护理部 同伴学习 焦点小组 心理学 医学 教育学 社会心理学 社会科学 替代医学 病理 营销 社会学 政治学 法学 业务
作者
Bryan Wong,Shefaly Shorey
出处
期刊:Nurse Education Today [Elsevier]
卷期号:116: 105469-105469 被引量:13
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105469
摘要

Peer feedback is an effective learning tool for students, improving academic performance and learning satisfaction. In nursing education, it has been widely used in the assimilation of clinical skills. However, the effectiveness of peer feedback as an educational intervention needs to be evaluated holistically beyond intervention research, considering students' perception to garner valuable insights to guide the successful implementation of peer feedback.This review aimed to consolidate the qualitative evidence exploring perceptions and experiences of nursing students who have used peer feedback as a learning tool.Qualitative systematic review.Nine databases were searched from their respective inception dates until December 2021.Data were extracted using a modified Joanna Brigg's qualitative data extraction tool, and the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool was used to appraise the quality of included studies. Meta-synthesis was done using Sandelowski and Barroso's two-step approach.The review included 14 studies and the synthesis identified an overarching theme: 'feeling lost to finding ways' and four themes: (1) An uncomfortable learning experience; (2) confronting disagreements; (3) greater engagement with learning; and (4) value added beyond learning.The present review summed up the wide range of nursing students' experiences, from feeling inadequate and having little confidence in the usefulness of peer feedback to reaping valuable benefits in terms of teamwork and leadership skills. The nursing curriculum could include peer feedback; however peer students adequate training and support. Future research could focus on developing and evaluating preparatory programs to improve the learning experiences of nursing students using peer feedback.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
天生圣人完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
刚刚
飞快的蜗牛完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
害羞爆米花完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
英俊的觅海完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
橙橙橙发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
张靖雯发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
小白发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
慕青应助老实芭蕉采纳,获得10
3秒前
大白完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
cjl完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
yan完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
心海发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
陈辰晨发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
彭于晏应助粒粒采纳,获得10
5秒前
星辰大海应助粒粒采纳,获得10
5秒前
科研通AI6.1应助粒粒采纳,获得10
5秒前
SciGPT应助粒粒采纳,获得10
5秒前
王王完成签到,获得积分0
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
lily完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
斯文败类应助喜悦非笑采纳,获得10
9秒前
可爱的函函应助cg采纳,获得10
9秒前
橙橙橙完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
如愿完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
李健的小迷弟应助Abner采纳,获得30
11秒前
12秒前
14秒前
科与少年游完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
zcw完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
周亚男发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
科研通AI6.1应助彭彭采纳,获得10
18秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Social Cognition: Understanding People and Events 1000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6030549
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7707556
关于积分的说明 16193860
捐赠科研通 5177454
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2770656
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1754116
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1639463