The Inadequacy of "Choice": Disability and What's Wrong with Feminist Framings of Reproduction

惊喜 流产 繁殖 心理学 受众测量 社会心理学 医学 怀孕 法学 政治学 生态学 遗传学 生物
作者
Alison Piepmeier
出处
期刊:Feminist Studies [Feminist Studies]
卷期号:39 (1): 159-186 被引量:32
标识
DOI:10.1353/fem.2013.0004
摘要

The Inadequacy of "Choice": Disability and What's Wrong withFeministFramings of Reproduction Alison Piepmeier When I was intentionally pregnant, I experienced a complex reproductive decision: whether to undergo prenatal testing. Our cul tural expectation is that pregnant women have prenatal testing per formed so that they can make the choice to terminate pregnancies with "defects." Down syndrome is a condition for which much pre natal screening and testing are done, and up to 90 percent of fetuses identified as having Down syndrome are terminated. I didn't want to be faced with that choice, and so I did not have an amniocentesis. I am now the happy parent of a daughter with Down syndrome. I shared this experience in a March 2012 article on the Mother lodeblog on the New YorkTimeswebsite. The New YorkTimesis aimed at a thoughtful audience, many of whom identify as liberal. Given this readership, it wasn't surprising that many of the more than 170 online comments made about the article accepted abortion as an available option. What did surprise me is the eugenicist use to which many of these readers would put abortion. They offered the choice of abortion as a way to avoid what they saw as an unacceptable situation, having a child with a disability. Here are several of the comments: A condition that brings with it guaranteed cognitive disabilities is not something I'm willing to inflict on another human being, much less my own beloved child. FeministStudies39, no. 1. © 2013 by Feminist Studies, Inc. 159 i6o Alison Piepmeier Knowingly giving birth to a special needs child is a crime against the child. I resent having to pay for children who are going to be a huge drain on society, financially and resource wise, if the parents knew in advance that they were going to have a special needs child. I was raised to believe that knowingly giving birth to a severely dis abled or mentally retarded baby was a sin—a really terrible sin — because it harmed not just the baby (who would never have a normal life) but also the family (including siblings who would be pressed into caring for an aging disabled brother or sister, no longer "cute" in their 50s) and society (stuck with enormous bills for a life time). I still feel that way. Hopefully in time, that 92% [of fetuses with Down syndrome that are terminated] will become lOO^.1 The comments as a whole were quite diverse, but these comments here were not rare. They are examples of the ignorant, troubling, and offensive narratives that surround reproduction, disability, and par enting in our culture. For instance, readers described giving birth to a person with a disability as an act of "harm" or cruelty, even as a "crime" — deeply stereotypical framings that individuals with disabil ities might well dispute. People with disabilities were being defined principally as "a huge drain on society." The term "normal life" was used as though it were an unambiguous goal, without acknowledging the extent to which "normal life" here is a narrowly imagined con struct that does not embrace the diversity of human existence. The final comment here concludes with the clearly eugenicist hope that 100 percent of fetuses with Down syndrome will be terminated. The world, presumably, is a better place ifpeople with Down syndrome or intellectual disabilities aren't in it. Such opinions are not just a feature of the open comments sec tion of Motherlode.They crop up—albeit in more nuanced ways—in feminist writing as well. The fact is, most feminist conversations haven't gone beyond the level of this online commentary. This isn't simply an observation about feminist understandings of disability; it's about feminist framings of reproduction. The narrative of "choice" that sur rounds and defines US reproductive rights discourse is simply inade quate. During my pregnancy, when my partner and I were deciding Alison Fiepmeier 161 whether to have an amniocentesis and, presumably, an abortion if the fetus had Down syndrome, I discovered that feminist texts had little to offer me. My story isn't one that many feminists are talking about—or if they are talking about it, it is in...

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
香芋应助猛犸象冲冲冲采纳,获得10
1秒前
如意厉完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
自乳化系统又creaming了完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
Slemon发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
jin发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
子车茗应助ikea1984采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
Jasper应助勤恳的若翠采纳,获得10
15秒前
zyt关闭了zyt文献求助
15秒前
Fred发布了新的文献求助50
16秒前
七月夏栀完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
顾矜应助ljy采纳,获得10
17秒前
sunshine发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
18秒前
顾矜应助jin采纳,获得10
20秒前
大闲鱼铭一完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
21秒前
FashionBoy应助棋子一小枚采纳,获得10
23秒前
害羞的裘完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
倪璞清完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
w_应助禀受采纳,获得10
24秒前
大模型应助lcd采纳,获得10
27秒前
moyawen发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
28秒前
我是老大应助小白兔采纳,获得10
30秒前
子舟完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
斯文败类应助Mryuan采纳,获得10
31秒前
拾忆完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
32秒前
32秒前
35秒前
李建涛完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
1257应助快乐的90后fjk采纳,获得10
39秒前
40秒前
lcd发布了新的文献求助10
40秒前
40秒前
41秒前
李爱国应助moyawen采纳,获得30
41秒前
42秒前
高分求助中
Impact of Mitophagy-Related Genes on the Diagnosis and Development of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma via Single-Cell RNA-seq Analysis and Machine Learning Algorithms 2000
Die Elektra-Partitur von Richard Strauss : ein Lehrbuch für die Technik der dramatischen Komposition 1000
How to Create Beauty: De Lairesse on the Theory and Practice of Making Art 1000
Gerard de Lairesse : an artist between stage and studio 670
大平正芳: 「戦後保守」とは何か 550
LNG地下タンク躯体の構造性能照査指針 500
Cathodoluminescence and its Application to Geoscience 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3000581
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2660351
关于积分的说明 7205018
捐赠科研通 2296234
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1217586
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 593826
版权声明 592931