医学
鼻咽癌
B组
放射治疗
A组
诱导化疗
内科学
生活质量(医疗保健)
随机对照试验
单中心
临床试验
顺铂
肿瘤科
化疗
外科
前瞻性队列研究
护理部
作者
Hongru Yang,Xin Chen,Sheng Lin,Jin‐Feng Rong,Mi Yang,Qinglian Wen,Chang-Ling Shang,Li-Jia He,Peirong Ren,Shan Xu,Jianwen Zhang,Qiaoli Liu,Haowen Pang,Xiangxiang Shi,Juan Fan,Xiaoyang Sun,Daiyuan Ma,Bangxian Tan,Tao Zhang,Ling Zhang,Defeng Hu,Xiaobo Du,Yu Zhang,Wen Shi-ming,Xinping Zhang,Jingbo Wu
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2017.07.020
摘要
To investigate whether reducing the target volume of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) after induction chemotherapy (IC) improves the quality of life (QOL) in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) without decreasing the local control and survival rate.A total number of 212 NPC patients staged as III-IVb were randomly assigned to group A (n=97) or group B (n=115) in this prospective clinical trial. All patients received IC followed by cisplatin concurrent with IMRT. IMRT was planned using the images of pre-IC in group A and post-IC in group B.The dose received by normal tissues in group B was lower than that of group A (P<0.05). The recovery of the dry mouth symptoms in group B was significantly improved than group B. The quality of life (QOL) scores in group B were higher than group A. With a median follow-up of 35months, the 1-year estimated overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional failure-free survival (LRFFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in group A versus group B were 97.9% vs 97.3%, 90.7% vs 92,2%, 99.0% vs 98.2%, 91.8% vs 94.8%. The 2-year OS, PFS, LRFFS, DMFS in group A versus group B were 93.7% vs 92.9%, 83.4% vs 84.3%, 96.8% vs 95.5%, 86.5% vs 89.5%. The 3-year OS, PFS, LRFFS, DMFS in group A versus group B were 82.3% vs 87%, 74.7% vs 83.4%, 91.8 vs 93.9%, 81.3% vs 88.6%, respectively.Reducing the IMRT target volume after IC did not reduce the local control and survival rate in locoregionally advanced NPC but the doses received by normal tissues were decreased, and the QOL scores were improved.