Effectiveness of a decision aid for promoting colorectal cancer screening in Spain: a randomized trial

医学 一致性 结肠镜检查 人口 随机对照试验 结直肠癌 家庭医学 入射(几何) 考试(生物学) 癌症筛查 粪便潜血 癌症 内科学 环境卫生 生物 光学 物理 古生物学
作者
Lilisbeth Perestelo-Pérez,Amado Rivero‐Santana,Alezandra Torres‐Castaño,Vanesa Ramos‐García,Yolanda Álvarez‐Pérez,Nerea González-Hernández,Andrea Burón,Michael Pignone,Pedro Serrano‐Aguilar
出处
期刊:BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making [Springer Nature]
卷期号:19 (1) 被引量:9
标识
DOI:10.1186/s12911-019-0739-6
摘要

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening has shown to reduce incidence and mortality rates, and therefore is widely recommended for people above 50 years-old. However, despite the implementation of population-based screening programs in several countries, uptake rates are still low. Decision aids (DAs) may help patients to make informed decisions about CRC screening. We performed a randomized controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of a DA developed to promote CRC screening, with patients from two primary care centers in Spain who never had underwent CRC screening. Contrary to center B (n = 24), Center A (n = 83) attended patients from an area where the population-based screening program was not implemented at that moment. Outcome measures were decisional conflict, knowledge of the disease and available screening options, intention to uptake the test, and concordance between patients’ goals/concerns and intention. In center A, there were significant differences favoring the DA in decisional conflict (p < 0.001) and knowledge (p < 0.001). The absolute differences favoring DA group in intention to undergo fecal occult blood test (10.5%) and colonoscopy (13.7%) were significant only before correction for attenuation. In center B the differences were significant only for knowledge (p < 0.001). Patients’ goals and concerns regarding the screening did not significantly predict their intention, and therefore we could not calculate a measure of concordance between the two constructs. A DA improved the decisional process of participants who had never been invited to participate in the Spanish public CRC screening program, replicating previous results in this field. Future research is needed to identify subgroups that could benefit more from these interventions. International Standard Registered Clinical/social Study Number: ISRCTN98108615 (Retrospectively registered on 27 December 2018).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
田様应助Vashon采纳,获得50
刚刚
X先生完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
3秒前
3秒前
nanfeng驳回了Owen应助
3秒前
青苔发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
dzjin完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
xiaozou完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
我是老大应助司空三问采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
不配.应助安静凡旋采纳,获得20
8秒前
顾矜应助jmsfasw采纳,获得10
9秒前
踏实的师发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
骑士发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
深情安青应助xx采纳,获得10
10秒前
Attendre完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
NexusExplorer应助夏天无采纳,获得10
12秒前
郝好完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
葫芦瓢发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
一只耳发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
完美世界应助思婷老公采纳,获得10
15秒前
15秒前
16秒前
wzk发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
17秒前
17秒前
耍酷的花卷完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
绿兔子发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
吉他平方完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
orixero应助BKP采纳,获得10
19秒前
19秒前
鸭鸭发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
共享精神应助Swiftie采纳,获得10
20秒前
21秒前
22秒前
23秒前
高分求助中
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2000
Bayesian Models of Cognition:Reverse Engineering the Mind 800
Essentials of thematic analysis 700
A Dissection Guide & Atlas to the Rabbit 600
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 568
Natural History of Mantodea 螳螂的自然史 500
Внешняя политика КНР: о сущности внешнеполитического курса современного китайского руководства 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3124660
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2774994
关于积分的说明 7724945
捐赠科研通 2430508
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1291144
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 622083
版权声明 600323