Explainable Machine Learning Model for Predicting GI Bleed Mortality in the Intensive Care Unit

医学 重症监护室 置信区间 接收机工作特性 曲线下面积 流血 重症监护 急诊医学 重症监护医学 机器学习 内科学 外科 计算机科学
作者
Farah Deshmukh,Shamel S. Merchant
出处
期刊:The American Journal of Gastroenterology [American College of Gastroenterology]
卷期号:115 (10): 1657-1668 被引量:90
标识
DOI:10.14309/ajg.0000000000000632
摘要

INTRODUCTION: Acute gastrointestinal (GI) bleed is a common reason for hospitalization with 2%–10% risk of mortality. In this study, we developed a machine learning (ML) model to calculate the risk of mortality in intensive care unit patients admitted for GI bleed and compared it with APACHE IVa risk score. We used explainable ML methods to provide insight into the model's prediction and outcome. METHODS: We analyzed the patient data in the Electronic Intensive Care Unit Collaborative Research Database and extracted data for 5,691 patients (mean age = 67.4 years; 61% men) admitted with GI bleed. The data were used in training a ML model to identify patients who died in the intensive care unit. We compared the predictive performance of the ML model with the APACHE IVa risk score. Performance was measured by area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis. This study also used explainable ML methods to provide insights into the model's outcome or prediction using the SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) method. RESULTS: The ML model performed better than the APACHE IVa risk score in correctly classifying the low-risk patients. The ML model had a specificity of 27% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 25–36) at a sensitivity of 100% compared with the APACHE IVa score, which had a specificity of 4% (95% CI: 3–31) at a sensitivity of 100%. The model identified patients who died with an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.80–0.90) in the internal validation set, whereas the APACHE IVa clinical scoring systems identified patients who died with AUC values of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.73–0.86) with P value <0.001. DISCUSSION: We developed a ML model that predicts the mortality in patients with GI bleed with a greater accuracy than the current scoring system. By making the ML model explainable, clinicians would be able to better understand the reasoning behind the outcome.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
2秒前
3秒前
5秒前
小杰发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
tip完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
8秒前
Penzias发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
nkpdsy完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
小小Li发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
猪蹄快冲发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
10秒前
田园发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
Owen应助guofurong采纳,获得10
12秒前
烂漫夜梦完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
李爱国应助nihao采纳,获得10
13秒前
黑神白了发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
所所应助niiiiii采纳,获得30
14秒前
14秒前
胡ddddd完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
singvu6688完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
18秒前
cff完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
小明发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
科研通AI6.3应助lighten采纳,获得30
22秒前
guofurong完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
干净的琦应助西多士颗粒采纳,获得10
26秒前
27秒前
27秒前
HY发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
fengxun完成签到,获得积分20
28秒前
28秒前
梵梵完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
28秒前
29秒前
雪山飞龙发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
29秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6025210
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7660817
关于积分的说明 16178551
捐赠科研通 5173359
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2768159
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1751580
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1637661