Explainable Machine Learning Model for Predicting GI Bleed Mortality in the Intensive Care Unit

医学 重症监护室 置信区间 接收机工作特性 曲线下面积 流血 重症监护 急诊医学 重症监护医学 机器学习 内科学 外科 计算机科学
作者
Farah Deshmukh,Shamel S. Merchant
出处
期刊:The American Journal of Gastroenterology [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:115 (10): 1657-1668 被引量:90
标识
DOI:10.14309/ajg.0000000000000632
摘要

INTRODUCTION: Acute gastrointestinal (GI) bleed is a common reason for hospitalization with 2%–10% risk of mortality. In this study, we developed a machine learning (ML) model to calculate the risk of mortality in intensive care unit patients admitted for GI bleed and compared it with APACHE IVa risk score. We used explainable ML methods to provide insight into the model's prediction and outcome. METHODS: We analyzed the patient data in the Electronic Intensive Care Unit Collaborative Research Database and extracted data for 5,691 patients (mean age = 67.4 years; 61% men) admitted with GI bleed. The data were used in training a ML model to identify patients who died in the intensive care unit. We compared the predictive performance of the ML model with the APACHE IVa risk score. Performance was measured by area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis. This study also used explainable ML methods to provide insights into the model's outcome or prediction using the SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) method. RESULTS: The ML model performed better than the APACHE IVa risk score in correctly classifying the low-risk patients. The ML model had a specificity of 27% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 25–36) at a sensitivity of 100% compared with the APACHE IVa score, which had a specificity of 4% (95% CI: 3–31) at a sensitivity of 100%. The model identified patients who died with an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.80–0.90) in the internal validation set, whereas the APACHE IVa clinical scoring systems identified patients who died with AUC values of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.73–0.86) with P value <0.001. DISCUSSION: We developed a ML model that predicts the mortality in patients with GI bleed with a greater accuracy than the current scoring system. By making the ML model explainable, clinicians would be able to better understand the reasoning behind the outcome.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
七七发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
沉静的含芙完成签到,获得积分20
刚刚
刚刚
刚刚
maxiaole应助zy采纳,获得10
刚刚
lzy完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
1秒前
xh发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
xh发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
xh发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
xh发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
xh发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
初景应助顾闭月采纳,获得20
2秒前
长岛冰茶发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
搞科研发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
萨瓦迪卡完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
思源应助111采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
长岛冰茶完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
maorongfu456发布了新的文献求助20
6秒前
6秒前
L拉丁是我干死的完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
谛听不听完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
勺子完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
Captain发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
Y_发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
FashionBoy应助满意日记本采纳,获得10
8秒前
我是蝈蝈发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
我是蝈蝈发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
我是蝈蝈发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
我是蝈蝈发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
高分求助中
Clinical Epidemiology: The Essentials, 6e 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Graphene Handbook (2019 Edition) 800
Adhesion Science: Principles & Practice 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 600
The Immune System (Fifth Edition) 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6557441
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8341199
关于积分的说明 17871382
捐赠科研通 5676611
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2940950
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1916772
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1787785