Explainable Machine Learning Model for Predicting GI Bleed Mortality in the Intensive Care Unit

医学 重症监护室 置信区间 接收机工作特性 曲线下面积 流血 重症监护 急诊医学 重症监护医学 机器学习 内科学 外科 计算机科学
作者
Farah Deshmukh,Shamel S. Merchant
出处
期刊:The American Journal of Gastroenterology [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:115 (10): 1657-1668 被引量:90
标识
DOI:10.14309/ajg.0000000000000632
摘要

INTRODUCTION: Acute gastrointestinal (GI) bleed is a common reason for hospitalization with 2%–10% risk of mortality. In this study, we developed a machine learning (ML) model to calculate the risk of mortality in intensive care unit patients admitted for GI bleed and compared it with APACHE IVa risk score. We used explainable ML methods to provide insight into the model's prediction and outcome. METHODS: We analyzed the patient data in the Electronic Intensive Care Unit Collaborative Research Database and extracted data for 5,691 patients (mean age = 67.4 years; 61% men) admitted with GI bleed. The data were used in training a ML model to identify patients who died in the intensive care unit. We compared the predictive performance of the ML model with the APACHE IVa risk score. Performance was measured by area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis. This study also used explainable ML methods to provide insights into the model's outcome or prediction using the SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) method. RESULTS: The ML model performed better than the APACHE IVa risk score in correctly classifying the low-risk patients. The ML model had a specificity of 27% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 25–36) at a sensitivity of 100% compared with the APACHE IVa score, which had a specificity of 4% (95% CI: 3–31) at a sensitivity of 100%. The model identified patients who died with an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.80–0.90) in the internal validation set, whereas the APACHE IVa clinical scoring systems identified patients who died with AUC values of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.73–0.86) with P value <0.001. DISCUSSION: We developed a ML model that predicts the mortality in patients with GI bleed with a greater accuracy than the current scoring system. By making the ML model explainable, clinicians would be able to better understand the reasoning behind the outcome.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Liu完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
墨小芃完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
罗毅应助唠叨的曼易采纳,获得10
2秒前
尹孟瑶发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
liujingyi发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
Lcl完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
NexusExplorer应助勤劳的访烟采纳,获得10
5秒前
专注刺猬完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
踏实秋莲发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
书啊完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
CipherSage应助ljj采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
慕青应助不吃鸭梨采纳,获得10
7秒前
隐形曼青应助z777采纳,获得10
8秒前
脑洞疼应助无心的成风采纳,获得10
8秒前
orixero应助精明怜南采纳,获得30
9秒前
华仔应助朽木采纳,获得10
9秒前
surhally发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
俭朴朝雪发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
plz发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
Raymond发布了新的文献求助200
12秒前
脑洞疼应助morecraft采纳,获得10
12秒前
李虹发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
CC完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
jiayillliu完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
lobster发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
14秒前
16秒前
谦让语兰发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
17秒前
JamesPei应助文静的听荷采纳,获得10
18秒前
典雅绮兰完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Römisch-Germanische Forschungen 1000
APA handbook of comparative psychology: Basic concepts, methods, neural substrate, and behavior 1000
China Pluperfect I: Epistemology of Past and Outside in Chinese Art 520
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
The fast track to determining transfer functions of linear circuits: The student guide 500
The Analytical and Numerical Solution of Electric and Magnetic Fields 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7611215
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9186879
关于积分的说明 19681227
捐赠科研通 7185053
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3270506
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2434122
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2265235