Long-term outcomes of endovenous laser ablation and conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veins

烧蚀 隐静脉 激光烧蚀 静脉 射频消融术
作者
Tom Wallace,Joseph El-Sheikha,Sandip Nandhra,Clement Leung,Abduraheem Mohamed,Amy Harwood,George E. Smith,Daniel Carradice,IC Chetter
出处
期刊:British Journal of Surgery [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:105 (13): 1759-1767 被引量:54
标识
DOI:10.1002/bjs.10961
摘要

Abstract Background Clinical guidelines recommend endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) over surgery based on short-term evidence, yet there are few studies reporting mid- to long-term outcomes. The aim of this study was to report the 5-year outcomes from an RCT of surgery versus EVLA for treatment of symptomatic great saphenous varicose veins. Methods Patients with symptomatic varicose veins due to great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence were followed up 5 years after enrolment in a randomized trial of either surgery (saphenofemoral junction ligation, GSV strip to the knee and multiple avulsions of varicosities) or EVLA plus multiple avulsions. Outcomes included: clinical recurrence, defined as new varicose veins greater than 3 mm in diameter; Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS); quality of life measured by means of Short Form 36, EuroQol Five Dimensions (EQ-5D™) and Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ); patient satisfaction; and duplex ultrasound examination (DUS) findings. Results Some 218 of the 276 patients enrolled in the trial (79·0 per cent) were available for follow-up. Clinical recurrence was more frequent following surgery than EVLA at 5 years (34·3 versus 20·9 per cent; P = 0·010). Both groups demonstrated sustained significant improvements at 5 years over baseline in VCSS (surgery: median (i.q.r.) 1 (0–2) from 4 (3-5), P < 0·001; EVLA: 0 (0–1) from 4 (3-5), P < 0·001), AVVQ (surgery: 4·59 (0·56–9·78) from 13·69 (9·81–18·11), P < 0·001; EVLA: 3·35 (0·17 to 6·55) from 12·73 (9·41–17·32), P < 0·001) and EQ-5D™ (surgery: 1·000 (0·796–1·000) from 0·859 (0·796–1·000), P = 0·002; EVLA: 1·000 (0·796–1·000) from 0·808 (0·796–1·000), P = 0·002). VCSS was better for EVLA than surgery at 5 years (P = 0·031). Technical success assessed by DUS remained high at 5 years (85·4 per cent for surgery and 93·2 per cent for EVLA; P = 0·074). DUS-detected anatomical patterns of recurrence differed between the groups. Conclusion EVLA was more effective than surgery in preventing clinical recurrence 5 years after treatment of great saphenous varicose veins. Patient-reported outcome measures were similar. Registration number: NCT00759434 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
慕新完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
灰灰发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
代博士发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
典雅的迎波完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
豆包完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
颜靖仇发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
小小小发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
有氧呼吸发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
露亮完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
豆包发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
犹豫大侠完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
PPRer完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
简简发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
露亮发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
从来都不会放弃zr完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
蓝蓝蓝发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
huan发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
清脆的如凡完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
yuminger发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
shi0331完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
HappyStarCat发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
大模型应助hanwei_mei采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
桐桐应助CM采纳,获得10
11秒前
高分求助中
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine Board Review 1000
Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences, Global Edition, 6th edition 600
こんなに痛いのにどうして「なんでもない」と医者にいわれてしまうのでしょうか 510
The First Nuclear Era: The Life and Times of a Technological Fixer 500
ALUMINUM STANDARDS AND DATA 500
Walter Gilbert: Selected Works 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3667282
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3225957
关于积分的说明 9766754
捐赠科研通 2935838
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1607958
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 759438
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 735359