The MISSED score, a new scoring system to predict Mortality In Severe Sepsis in the Emergency Department

医学 急诊科 置信区间 优势比 败血症 死亡率 单变量 内科学 单变量分析 多元分析 阿帕奇II 接收机工作特性 多元统计 急诊医学 重症监护室 统计 精神科 数学
作者
Narani Sivayoham,Andrew Rhodes,Maurizio Cecconi
出处
期刊:European Journal of Emergency Medicine [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:: 1-1 被引量:21
标识
DOI:10.1097/mej.0b013e328364a8d4
摘要

To derive and validate a new scoring system to predict in-hospital mortality in septic patients in the emergency department (ED).Septic patients admitted to the ICU and those in whom early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) was carried out in the ED were identified from the ED record. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses identified independent variables associated with mortality. The variables were given a score weighted by the odds ratio, the sum of which yielded the Mortality In Severe Sepsis in the Emergency Department (MISSED) score. The performance of the MISSED score in predicting mortality was compared with that of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, the EGDT criteria and the severe sepsis criteria. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test was performed to calibrate the model.Independent variables identified were age at least 65 years, albumin level up to 27 g/l and international normalized ratio of 1.2 or more. The MISSED score ranged from 0-9; cut-off point 5.5. Mortality rates associated with a score of 0, less than 5.5 and 5.5 or more were 7.4, 17.7 and 40.6%, respectively. The sensitivity of the score was 96.8% (95% confidence interval 87.8-99.4%). The mortality rate and specificity associated with a score of 9 were 62.9 and 91.6% respectively. The area under the curve for the MISSED score and the APACHE II score were equal. The performance of the MISSED score of 5.5 or more in predicting mortality was similar to that of the EGDT criteria. The sensitivity of the score was equal to that for the severe sepsis criteria. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test confirmed good calibration.The MISSED score should be used in the ED.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
科研通AI5应助时倾采纳,获得10
刚刚
1秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助150
1秒前
动听无声完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
逆麟发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
coconut完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
榆果子发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
envdavid完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
阿佳发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
施方威发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
芬芬完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
东方诩完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
内向柚子发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
Yy杨优秀完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
安安发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
loser发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
开心凌柏完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
Seraph发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
aabot完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
liyu发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
上官若男应助KKK采纳,获得10
6秒前
yvonne发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
罗dd完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
Miller完成签到,获得积分0
8秒前
xxy完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
不安青牛应助复杂采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
淡然觅荷完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
超级南风完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
aa完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual, Fourth Edition 1000
Comparison of spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia in total hip and total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review 500
INQUIRY-BASED PEDAGOGY TO SUPPORT STEM LEARNING AND 21ST CENTURY SKILLS: PREPARING NEW TEACHERS TO IMPLEMENT PROJECT AND PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING 500
Writing to the Rhythm of Labor Cultural Politics of the Chinese Revolution, 1942–1976 300
Lightning Wires: The Telegraph and China's Technological Modernization, 1860-1890 250
Psychology for Teachers 220
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 催化作用 遗传学 冶金 电极 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4584741
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4001741
关于积分的说明 12387521
捐赠科研通 3677672
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2026858
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1060403
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 947010