亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Sequential Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization and RF Ablation versus RF Ablation Alone: A Prospective Randomized Trial

医学 烧蚀 肝细胞癌 射频消融术 经导管动脉化疗栓塞 随机对照试验 射频消融 前瞻性队列研究 核医学 外科 内科学 泌尿科
作者
Zhenwei Peng,Yaojun Zhang,Hui-Hong Liang,Xiao-Jun Lin,Rong Guo,Min-Shan Chen
出处
期刊:Radiology [Radiological Society of North America]
卷期号:262 (2): 689-700 被引量:200
标识
DOI:10.1148/radiol.11110637
摘要

To compare prospectively the effects of radiofrequency (RF) ablation after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) with those of RF ablation alone in the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and all patients gave written informed consent. From January 2002 to December 2006, 139 patients with recurrent HCC measuring 5 cm in diameter or smaller were randomized to receive either sequential TACE and RF ablation (sequential treatment group, n=69) or RF ablation alone (RF ablation group, n=70). The survival curves were constructed with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by using the log-rank test. Bonferroni correction was applied when multiple comparisons were performed. P<.0083 (.05÷6) was considered indicative of a statistically significant difference.The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 94%, 69%, and 46%, respectively, for the sequential treatment group and 82%, 47%, and 36% for the RF ablation group (P=.037). The corresponding recurrence-free survival rates were 80%, 45%, and 40% for the sequential treatment group and 64%, 18%, and 18% for the ablation group (P=.005). At subgroup analyses, the overall survival for the sequential treatment group was better than that for the RF ablation group for patients with tumor recurrence 1 year or less after initial treatment (P=.004) and those with tumors measuring 3.1-5.0 cm (P=.002) but not for those with tumor recurrence more than 1 year after initial treatment (P=.421) and those with tumors 3.0 cm or smaller (P=.478). The recurrence-free survival in the sequential treatment group was better than that in the RF ablation group for patients with tumors measuring 3.1-5.0 cm (P<.001) but not for those with tumors 3.0 cm or smaller (P=.204). For recurrence-free survival, there was no significant difference between the two groups for patients with tumor recurrence 1 year or less or more than 1 year after initial treatment (P=.020 and P=.111, respectively). Logistic regression analysis showed that treatment allocation and the interval between initial treatment and tumor recurrence were significant prognostic factors for overall survival, whereas the interval between initial treatment and tumor recurrence, treatment allocation, and tumor size were significant prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival.The efficacy of sequential TACE-RF ablation is better than that of RF ablation alone for recurrent HCC.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
3秒前
4秒前
yhp完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
35秒前
35秒前
Tumumu完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
42秒前
同尘完成签到 ,获得积分10
44秒前
维尼发布了新的文献求助10
50秒前
57秒前
小马甲应助甜甜的老三采纳,获得10
57秒前
orixero应助o_0采纳,获得20
1分钟前
matrixu完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
彭于晏应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
Jasper应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
bkagyin应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
sunny完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
调皮的灰狼完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
柒月流火完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
Jeriu完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
迅速初柳发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
光亮的半山完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
3分钟前
瑾木完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
Wilson发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
科研通AI6应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
田様应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
Wilson完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
NexusExplorer应助柒月流火采纳,获得10
3分钟前
zq发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
斯文的苡完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
顾萘发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Fermented Coffee Market 2000
合成生物食品制造技术导则,团体标准,编号:T/CITS 396-2025 1000
The Leucovorin Guide for Parents: Understanding Autism’s Folate 1000
Pipeline and riser loss of containment 2001 - 2020 (PARLOC 2020) 1000
Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Learning and Your Life 4th Edition 500
Comparing natural with chemical additive production 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 内科学 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 纳米技术 遗传学 基因 复合材料 化学工程 物理化学 病理 催化作用 免疫学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5244898
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4410628
关于积分的说明 13728255
捐赠科研通 4280639
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2348728
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1345862
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1304448