Is auriculotherapy effective and safe for the treatment of anxiety disorders? – A systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 荟萃分析 安慰剂 随机对照试验 焦虑 严格标准化平均差 置信区间 系统回顾 平均差 分级(工程) 证据质量 纳入和排除标准 梅德林 物理疗法 内科学 精神科 替代医学 病理 土木工程 政治学 法学 工程类
作者
Andreia Espindola Vieira,António Carrizo Moreira,Jorge Machado,Nicola Robinson,Xiao-Yang Hu
出处
期刊:European Journal of Integrative Medicine [Elsevier]
卷期号:54: 102157-102157 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.eujim.2022.102157
摘要

Auriculotherapy (AA) could support standard treatment for anxiety disorders (AD), but its effectiveness and safety remain undetermined. The aim of this systematic review was to determine whether AA was effective and safe for treating people with AD. Searches were conducted on eight databases for randomized controlled trials (RCT) evaluating the effectiveness and safety of AA compared with placebo, waiting list treatment, routine care, or alternative treatment. Searches were run from inception until the 30th of June 2021. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool and quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation tool. Meta-analyses were conducted using statistical software RevMan V5.4. The protocol was published and registered PROSPERO ID: CRD42021254503. Thirteen trials met the inclusion criteria for quality and of these nine were included in the meta-analysis. AA (n=386) reduced anxiety levels compared with placebo (n=382) standardized mean difference (SMD): -0.44 95% of Confidence Intervals (CI) [-0.60, -0.28], 9 studies, for AA compared with a waiting list (n=360), 8 studies SMD (-0.55; 95% CI [-0.70, -0.41]). Certainty was graded as moderate and with unlikely publication bias. There was moderate certainty of evidence for an AA (n=130) intervention for pre-operatory anxiety levels when compared with placebo (n=129) SMD -1.40 95% CI [-2.54, -0.26], 3 studies and when compared with a waiting list group (n=98) Mean difference (MD) -5.02 95% CI [-8.15, -1.90], 2 studies. Few studies reported adverse events and other important secondary outcomes such as salivary cortisol and vital signs. AA may be effective as a complementary treatment for situational anxiety. There is still an evidence gap regarding its safety and efficacy. The type and frequency of AA used for anxiety treatment requires further exploration.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
狂奔弟弟2完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
ClaudiaCY完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
才露尖尖角完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
Hello应助意安采纳,获得10
2秒前
ljj发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
MOMO完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
大个应助咸鱼想翻身采纳,获得10
3秒前
怡然的无敌完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
动听的菀发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
无也关注了科研通微信公众号
3秒前
4秒前
丘比特应助科研r采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
HEIKU应助病理小甜甜采纳,获得10
4秒前
林小锋完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
周亭完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
狂野思卉发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
卿莞尔完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
yy爱科研完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
wuzeio给wuzeio的求助进行了留言
6秒前
7秒前
彩色的芝麻完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
达西西完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
爱科研的光催人完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
宁依风发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
www完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
Cc完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
llllllll完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
wangchangli完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
wudizhuzhu233发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
回来完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
shanyu发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
日光之恋发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
狂野思卉完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
ao黛雷赫完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
深情安青应助不安的雪巧采纳,获得10
13秒前
搜集达人应助vivre223采纳,获得10
13秒前
高分求助中
Genetics: From Genes to Genomes 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2500
Continuum thermodynamics and material modelling 2000
Healthcare Finance: Modern Financial Analysis for Accelerating Biomedical Innovation 2000
Applications of Emerging Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology 1111
Les Mantodea de Guyane Insecta, Polyneoptera 1000
Diabetes: miniguías Asklepios 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 材料科学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 纳米技术 内科学 物理 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 细胞生物学 免疫学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3472039
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3065043
关于积分的说明 9091864
捐赠科研通 2755749
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1512160
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 698704
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 698563