Double-Row Repair With Platelet-Rich Plasma Optimizes Retear Rates After Small to Medium Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

医学 肩袖 外科 眼泪 随机对照试验 荟萃分析 肩峰成形术 运动范围 心理干预 内科学 精神科
作者
Ophelie Lavoie-Gagne,Matthew S. Fury,Nabil Mehta,William Harkin,David N. Bernstein,Elyse J. Berlinberg,Kevin C. Parvaresh,Evan O’Donnell,Brian Forsythe
出处
期刊:Arthroscopy [Elsevier]
卷期号:38 (9): 2714-2729 被引量:9
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2022.03.014
摘要

Purpose To compare the different interventions described in the literature for the surgical treatment of small and medium complete rotator cuff tears. Methods A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of small-medium, full-thickness rotator cuff tears published since 2000 was performed. Clinical characteristics, re-tear rates, range of motion (ROM), and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) data were collected. Interventions were compared via arm-based Bayesian network meta-analysis in a random-effects model. Interventions were ranked for each domain (re-tear risk, pain, ROM, and PROs) via surface under the cumulative ranking curves. Results A total of 18 studies comprising 2046 shoulders (47% females, mean age 61 ± 3 years, mean follow-up 21 ± 5 months) were included. Interventions that ranked highest for minimizing re-tear risk included arthroscopic single-row repair (A+SR) or double-row repair (A+DR) with or without platelet-rich plasma (PRP). Open repair and A+SR repair with acromioplasty (ACP) ranked highest for pain relief. Interventions that ranked highest for ROM improvement included open repair, PT, and A+DR with or without ACP. Interventions that ranked highest for PROs included arthroscopic footprint microfracture with or without SR, open repair, and A+SR with or without ACP. Conclusions Based on a network meta-analysis of level 1 studies, arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with a SR or DR construct demonstrates similar retear rates, PROs, and clinical outcomes. The highest-ranking treatment for minimizing retears was arthroscopic repair with DR constructs and PRP augmentation, although open repair and arthroscopic SR remain reliable options with excellent clinical outcomes. Addition of PRP to DR constructs trended toward a 56% decreased risk of retear as compared to DR repair alone. Although no single treatment emerged superior, several interventions offered excellent clinical improvements in pain, ROM, and PROs that exceeded minimal clinically important difference thresholds. Level of evidence I, systematic review and meta-analysis of level I studies. To compare the different interventions described in the literature for the surgical treatment of small and medium complete rotator cuff tears. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of small-medium, full-thickness rotator cuff tears published since 2000 was performed. Clinical characteristics, re-tear rates, range of motion (ROM), and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) data were collected. Interventions were compared via arm-based Bayesian network meta-analysis in a random-effects model. Interventions were ranked for each domain (re-tear risk, pain, ROM, and PROs) via surface under the cumulative ranking curves. A total of 18 studies comprising 2046 shoulders (47% females, mean age 61 ± 3 years, mean follow-up 21 ± 5 months) were included. Interventions that ranked highest for minimizing re-tear risk included arthroscopic single-row repair (A+SR) or double-row repair (A+DR) with or without platelet-rich plasma (PRP). Open repair and A+SR repair with acromioplasty (ACP) ranked highest for pain relief. Interventions that ranked highest for ROM improvement included open repair, PT, and A+DR with or without ACP. Interventions that ranked highest for PROs included arthroscopic footprint microfracture with or without SR, open repair, and A+SR with or without ACP. Based on a network meta-analysis of level 1 studies, arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with a SR or DR construct demonstrates similar retear rates, PROs, and clinical outcomes. The highest-ranking treatment for minimizing retears was arthroscopic repair with DR constructs and PRP augmentation, although open repair and arthroscopic SR remain reliable options with excellent clinical outcomes. Addition of PRP to DR constructs trended toward a 56% decreased risk of retear as compared to DR repair alone. Although no single treatment emerged superior, several interventions offered excellent clinical improvements in pain, ROM, and PROs that exceeded minimal clinically important difference thresholds.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Lucas应助小土豆采纳,获得10
刚刚
liu完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
xiao太阳关注了科研通微信公众号
2秒前
jaslorimine完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
平淡的采文应助dududu采纳,获得10
3秒前
领导范儿应助负责的含玉采纳,获得10
3秒前
充电宝应助日辰彗心采纳,获得10
3秒前
小琦琦发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
大聪明发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
薰硝壤应助123采纳,获得10
6秒前
魂不守舍的太阳完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
KimJongUn完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助mlle采纳,获得10
7秒前
小马甲应助rita_sun1969采纳,获得20
7秒前
学术rookie完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
乐观冥幽发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
横扫一切牛鬼蛇神完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
Zach完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
pluto应助汉堡上的鸽子粪采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
上岸完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
Owen应助拨云见日采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
whyzz完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
12秒前
一指流沙发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
缪南风完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
NexusExplorer应助missjucinda采纳,获得10
13秒前
Secyu完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
虚幻鑫磊完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
吴开心完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
高分求助中
【此为提示信息,请勿应助】请按要求发布求助,避免被关 20000
【本贴是提醒信息,请勿应助】请在求助之前详细阅读求助说明!!!! 20000
Evolution 5000
좌파는 어떻게 좌파가 됐나:한국 급진노동운동의 형성과 궤적 2500
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 1500
La Chine révolutionnaire d'aujourd'hui / Van Min, Kang Hsin 1000
TM 5-855-1(Fundamentals of protective design for conventional weapons) 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3044087
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2701275
关于积分的说明 7383057
捐赠科研通 2345240
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1241363
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 603809
版权声明 595493