Two approaches for newborns with critical congenital heart disease: a comparative study

Prenatal diagnosis and planned peripartum care is an unexplored concept in China. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the "prenatal diagnosis and postnatal treatment integrated model" for newborns with critical congenital heart disease.The medical records of neonates (≤ 28 days) admitted to Fuwai Hospital were reviewed retrospectively from January 2019 to December 2020. The patients were divided into "prenatal diagnosis and postnatal treatment integrated group" (n = 47) and "non-integrated group" (n = 69).The age of admission to the hospital and the age at surgery were earlier in the integrated group than in the non-integrated group (5.2 ± 7.2 days vs. 11.8 ± 8.0 days, P < 0.001; 11.9 ± 7.0 days vs. 16.5 ± 7.7 days, P = 0.001, respectively). The weight at surgery also was lower in the integrated group than in the non-integrated group (3.3 ± 0.4 kg vs. 3.6 ± 0.6 kg, P = 0.010). Longer postoperative recovery time was needed in the integrated group, with a median mechanical ventilation time of 97 h (interquartile range 51-259 h) vs. 69 h (29-168 h) (P = 0.030) and with intensive care unit time of 13.0 days (8.0-21.0 days) vs. 9.0 days (4.5-16.0 days) (P = 0.048). No significant difference was observed in the all-cause mortality (2.1 vs. 8.7%, P = 0.238), but it was significantly lower in the integrated group for transposition of the great arteries (0 vs. 18.8%, log rank P = 0.032).The prenatal diagnosis and postnatal treatment integrated model could significantly shorten the diagnosis and hospitalization interval of newborns, and surgical intervention could be performed with a lower risk of death, especially for transposition of the great arteries.