医学
经皮
腹膜透析
导管
外科
前瞻性队列研究
透析
透析导管
队列
内科学
作者
Hugo E. Chávez‐Chávez,Elisa Naomi Hernández‐Paredes,Gabriel Cojuc‐Konigsberg,Cecilia Vargas‐Rodríguez,Laura Margarita Díaz‐Canchola,Octavio Vergara‐Zavala,Alonso Fernández‐Venegas,Nadia Stephani Acevedo‐Juárez,Ricardo Correa‐Rotter,Juan C. Ramírez-Sandoval
标识
DOI:10.1111/1744-9987.14000
摘要
Abstract Introduction Peritoneal dialysis (PD) guidelines recommend a 14‐day break‐in period after catheter placement, yet this period could be shortened with new insertion techniques. Methods We conducted a prospective cohort study to compare percutaneous vs. surgical catheter insertion in a newly established PD program. The break‐in period was intentionally shortened to <24 h to start PD almost immediately. Results We included 223 subjects who underwent percutaneous (34%) or surgical (66%) catheter placement. Compared to the surgical group, the percutaneous group had a higher proportion of early dialysis initiation within 24 h (97% vs. 8%, p < 0.001), similar successful initiation rates (87% vs. 92%, p = 0.34), and shorter lengths of stay (12 [9–18] vs. 18 [14–22] days, p < 0.001). Percutaneous insertion increased the likelihood of successful PD initiation within 24 h (OR 74, 95% CI 31–182), without increasing major complications. Conclusion Percutaneous placement could represent a cost‐effective and efficient technique to shorten break‐in periods.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI