Hemodynamic assessment for intracranial atherosclerosis from angiographic images: a clinical validation study

医学 数字减影血管造影 狭窄 血管造影 血流动力学 放射科 冲程(发动机) 心脏病学 脑血管造影 核医学 内科学 机械工程 工程类
作者
Pengfei Yang,Shu Wan,Jun Wang,Yumeng Hu,Ning Ma,Xiaohui Wang,Yongwei Zhang,Lei Zhang,Xuan Zhu,Fang Shen,Qian Zheng,Ming Wang,Xiaochang Leng,Jens Fiehler,Adnan H. Siddiqui,Zhongrong Miao,Jianping Xiang,Jianmin Liu
出处
期刊:Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery [BMJ]
卷期号:16 (2): 204-208 被引量:14
标识
DOI:10.1136/jnis-2023-020073
摘要

Background Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is one of the leading causes of ischemic stroke. Conventional anatomical analysis by CT angiography, MRI, or digital subtraction angiography can provide valuable information on the anatomical changes of stenosis; however, they are not sufficient to accurately evaluate the hemodynamic severity of ICAS. The goal of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of the pressure ratio across intracranial stenoses (termed as fractional flow (FF)) derived from cerebral angiography for the diagnosis of hemodynamically significant ICAS defined by pressure wire-derived FF. Methods This retrospective study represents a feasible and reliable method for calculating the FF from cerebral angiography (AccuFFicas). Patients (n=121) who had undergone wire-based measurement of FF and cerebral angiography were recruited. The accuracy of the computed pressure ratio was evaluated using wire-based FF as the reference standard. Results The mean value of wire-based FF was 0.78±0.19, while the computed AccuFFicas had an average value of 0.79±0.18. Good correlation (Pearson’s correlation coefficient r =0.92, P<0.001) between AccuFFicas and FF was observed. Bland–Altman analysis showed that the mean difference between AccuFFicas and FF was −0.01±0.07, indicating good agreement. The area under the curve (AUC) of AccuFFicas in predicting FF≤0.70, FF≤0.75, and FF≤0.80 was 0.984, 0.986, and 0.962, respectively. Conclusion Angiography-based FF computed from cerebral angiographic images could be an effective computational tool for evaluating the hemodynamic significance of ICAS.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
刚刚
呜呜呜发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
Ava应助黎JX采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
orixero应助专注老九采纳,获得10
2秒前
丘比特应助Netsky采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
daodao发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
科研通AI6.2应助gyq采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
qks完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
豚豚完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
CipherSage应助愉快幻悲采纳,获得30
5秒前
wangyr11完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
赘婿应助hwiseo采纳,获得10
5秒前
夜白发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
隐形曼青应助陈哈哈采纳,获得10
5秒前
mdjinij完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
牧屿完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
善学以致用应助lalalal采纳,获得10
7秒前
自由的钧完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
懒大王发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
炸药发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
科研狗完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
ZZ0110Z发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
牧屿发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
朴实无力的科研小白完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 5000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 纳米技术 化学工程 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 冶金 细胞生物学 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6016504
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7598486
关于积分的说明 16152466
捐赠科研通 5164217
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2764624
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1745571
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1634954