创伤性脑损伤
医学
回顾性队列研究
阿司匹林
队列
急诊医学
内科学
精神科
作者
Andrew Webb,Heath J. Oetken,A. Joseph Plott,Christopher Knapp,Daniel Munger,Erica Gibson,Martin A. Schreiber,Cassie A. Barton
出处
期刊:The journal of trauma and acute care surgery
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:2022-08-24
卷期号:94 (2): 320-327
被引量:6
标识
DOI:10.1097/ta.0000000000003772
摘要
Current Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG) characterize patients with intracranial hemorrhage taking antiplatelet or anticoagulant agents as BIG 3 (the most severe category) regardless of trauma severity. This study assessed the risk of in-hospital mortality or need for neurosurgery in patients taking low-dose aspirin who otherwise would be classified as BIG 1.This was a retrospective study at an academic level 1 trauma center. Patients were included if they were admitted with traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage and were evaluated by the BIG criteria. Exclusion criteria included indeterminate BIG status or patients with missing primary outcomes documentation. Patients were categorized as BIG 1, BIG 2, BIG 3, or BIG 1 on aspirin (patients with BIG 1 features taking low-dose aspirin). The primary endpoint was a composite of neurosurgical intervention and all-cause in-hospital mortality. Key secondary endpoints include rate of intracranial hemorrhage progression, and intensive care unit- and hospital-free days.A total of 1,520 patients met the inclusion criteria. Median initial Glasgow Coma Scale was 14 (interquartile range [IQR], 12-15), Injury Severity Scale score was 17 (IQR, 10-25), and Abbreviated Injury Scale subscore head and neck (AIS Head ) was 3 (IQR, 3-4). The rate of the primary outcome for BIG 1, BIG 1 on aspirin, BIG 2, and BIG 3 was 1%, 2.2%, 1%, and 27%, respectively; the difference between BIG 1 on aspirin and BIG 3 was significant ( p < 0.001).Patients taking low-dose aspirin with otherwise BIG 1-grade injuries experienced mortality and required neurosurgery significantly less often than other patients categorized as BIG 3. Inclusion of low-dose aspirin in the BIG criteria should be reevaluated.Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI