Association of Daily Step Count and Step Intensity With Mortality Among US Adults

医学 节奏 四分位数 体质指数 全国健康与营养检查调查 危险系数 比例危险模型 冲程(发动机) 物理疗法 人口学 内科学 人口 置信区间 物理医学与康复 社会学 环境卫生 机械工程 工程类
作者
Pedro F. Saint‐Maurice,Richard P. Troiano,David R. Bassett,Barry I. Graubard,Susan A. Carlson,Eric J. Shiroma,Janet E. Fulton,Charles E. Matthews
出处
期刊:JAMA [American Medical Association]
卷期号:323 (12): 1151-1151 被引量:657
标识
DOI:10.1001/jama.2020.1382
摘要

Importance: It is unclear whether the number of steps per day and the intensity of stepping are associated with lower mortality. Objective: Describe the dose-response relationship between step count and intensity and mortality. Design, Setting, and Participants: Representative sample of US adults aged at least 40 years in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey who wore an accelerometer for up to 7 days ( from 2003-2006). Mortality was ascertained through December 2015. Exposures: Accelerometer-measured number of steps per day and 3 step intensity measures (extended bout cadence, peak 30-minute cadence, and peak 1-minute cadence [steps/min]). Accelerometer data were based on measurements obtained during a 7-day period at baseline. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer mortality. Hazard ratios (HRs), mortality rates, and 95% CIs were estimated using cubic splines and quartile classifications adjusting for age; sex; race/ethnicity; education; diet; smoking status; body mass index; self-reported health; mobility limitations; and diagnoses of diabetes, stroke, heart disease, heart failure, cancer, chronic bronchitis, and emphysema. Results: A total of 4840 participants (mean age, 56.8 years; 2435 [54%] women; 1732 [36%] individuals with obesity) wore accelerometers for a mean of 5.7 days for a mean of 14.4 hours per day. The mean number of steps per day was 9124. There were 1165 deaths over a mean 10.1 years of follow-up, including 406 CVD and 283 cancer deaths. The unadjusted incidence density for all-cause mortality was 76.7 per 1000 person-years (419 deaths) for the 655 individuals who took less than 4000 steps per day; 21.4 per 1000 person-years (488 deaths) for the 1727 individuals who took 4000 to 7999 steps per day; 6.9 per 1000 person-years (176 deaths) for the 1539 individuals who took 8000 to 11 999 steps per day; and 4.8 per 1000 person-years (82 deaths) for the 919 individuals who took at least 12 000 steps per day. Compared with taking 4000 steps per day, taking 8000 steps per day was associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality (HR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.44-0.55]), as was taking 12 000 steps per day (HR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.28-0.45]). Unadjusted incidence density for all-cause mortality by peak 30 cadence was 32.9 per 1000 person-years (406 deaths) for the 1080 individuals who took 18.5 to 56.0 steps per minute; 12.6 per 1000 person-years (207 deaths) for the 1153 individuals who took 56.1 to 69.2 steps per minute; 6.8 per 1000 person-years (124 deaths) for the 1074 individuals who took 69.3 to 82.8 steps per minute; and 5.3 per 1000 person-years (108 deaths) for the 1037 individuals who took 82.9 to 149.5 steps per minute. Greater step intensity was not significantly associated with lower mortality after adjustment for total steps per day (eg, highest vs lowest quartile of peak 30 cadence: HR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.65-1.27]; P value for trend = .34). Conclusions and Relevance: Based on a representative sample of US adults, a greater number of daily steps was significantly associated with lower all-cause mortality. There was no significant association between step intensity and mortality after adjusting for total steps per day.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
科研通AI6.4应助绿豆糕采纳,获得30
刚刚
英姑应助jjjj采纳,获得10
刚刚
jn完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
贪玩傲安发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
鳗鱼尔蝶完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
shanshan完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
香蕉觅云应助WTBD采纳,获得10
3秒前
高高朋友发布了新的文献求助20
3秒前
4秒前
fang20130608发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
阿超完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
6秒前
康康完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
小章鱼完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
lixin完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
标致过客2025完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
7秒前
jty完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
深情安青应助宝海青采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
jie完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
YXM1发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
xing_xing应助锅包又采纳,获得20
10秒前
花花hau花花花完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
Hing发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
12秒前
锵锵发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
zoudegui发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
Chen发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
14秒前
14秒前
晓晓发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
隐形曼青应助甜美的柜子采纳,获得10
16秒前
风趣的文博完成签到,获得积分20
16秒前
JJ完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
FAN发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
A Psychological Understanding of Criticism and Mental Health 600
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7751623
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9298929
关于积分的说明 20249490
捐赠科研通 7333775
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3309940
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2461450
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2322629