Association of Daily Step Count and Step Intensity With Mortality Among US Adults

医学 节奏 四分位数 体质指数 全国健康与营养检查调查 危险系数 比例危险模型 死亡率 物理疗法 人口学 内科学 人口 置信区间 物理医学与康复 环境卫生 社会学
作者
Pedro F. Saint‐Maurice,Richard P. Troiano,David R. Bassett,Barry I. Graubard,Susan A. Carlson,Eric J. Shiroma,Janet E. Fulton,Charles E. Matthews
出处
期刊:JAMA [American Medical Association]
卷期号:323 (12): 1151-1151 被引量:461
标识
DOI:10.1001/jama.2020.1382
摘要

Importance

It is unclear whether the number of steps per day and the intensity of stepping are associated with lower mortality.

Objective

Describe the dose-response relationship between step count and intensity and mortality.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Representative sample of US adults aged at least 40 years in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey who wore an accelerometer for up to 7 days ( from 2003-2006). Mortality was ascertained through December 2015.

Exposures

Accelerometer-measured number of steps per day and 3 step intensity measures (extended bout cadence, peak 30-minute cadence, and peak 1-minute cadence [steps/min]). Accelerometer data were based on measurements obtained during a 7-day period at baseline.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer mortality. Hazard ratios (HRs), mortality rates, and 95% CIs were estimated using cubic splines and quartile classifications adjusting for age; sex; race/ethnicity; education; diet; smoking status; body mass index; self-reported health; mobility limitations; and diagnoses of diabetes, stroke, heart disease, heart failure, cancer, chronic bronchitis, and emphysema.

Results

A total of 4840 participants (mean age, 56.8 years; 2435 [54%] women; 1732 [36%] individuals with obesity) wore accelerometers for a mean of 5.7 days for a mean of 14.4 hours per day. The mean number of steps per day was 9124. There were 1165 deaths over a mean 10.1 years of follow-up, including 406 CVD and 283 cancer deaths. The unadjusted incidence density for all-cause mortality was 76.7 per 1000 person-years (419 deaths) for the 655 individuals who took less than 4000 steps per day; 21.4 per 1000 person-years (488 deaths) for the 1727 individuals who took 4000 to 7999 steps per day; 6.9 per 1000 person-years (176 deaths) for the 1539 individuals who took 8000 to 11 999 steps per day; and 4.8 per 1000 person-years (82 deaths) for the 919 individuals who took at least 12 000 steps per day. Compared with taking 4000 steps per day, taking 8000 steps per day was associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality (HR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.44-0.55]), as was taking 12 000 steps per day (HR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.28-0.45]). Unadjusted incidence density for all-cause mortality by peak 30 cadence was 32.9 per 1000 person-years (406 deaths) for the 1080 individuals who took 18.5 to 56.0 steps per minute; 12.6 per 1000 person-years (207 deaths) for the 1153 individuals who took 56.1 to 69.2 steps per minute; 6.8 per 1000 person-years (124 deaths) for the 1074 individuals who took 69.3 to 82.8 steps per minute; and 5.3 per 1000 person-years (108 deaths) for the 1037 individuals who took 82.9 to 149.5 steps per minute. Greater step intensity was not significantly associated with lower mortality after adjustment for total steps per day (eg, highest vs lowest quartile of peak 30 cadence: HR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.65-1.27];Pvalue for trend = .34).

Conclusions and Relevance

Based on a representative sample of US adults, a greater number of daily steps was significantly associated with lower all-cause mortality. There was no significant association between step intensity and mortality after adjusting for total steps per day.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
Owen应助renovel采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
4秒前
慧慧发布了新的文献求助30
4秒前
Vin完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
白小白发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
9秒前
11秒前
13秒前
Gergeo应助小周小周采纳,获得50
14秒前
16秒前
fly发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
17秒前
Aurora关注了科研通微信公众号
17秒前
旺旺完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
iuyol发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
幸福雪青完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
精灵夜雨应助白小白采纳,获得10
21秒前
21秒前
丘比特应助LHL采纳,获得10
22秒前
friends发布了新的文献求助80
22秒前
Dear发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
25秒前
Aurora发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
26秒前
欢呼谷冬完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
27秒前
小棍子完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
28秒前
WT关闭了WT文献求助
28秒前
王亚茹完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
29秒前
徐矜发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
32秒前
学术垃圾制造者完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
火华发布了新的文献求助10
33秒前
HH完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
高分求助中
Evolution 10000
юрские динозавры восточного забайкалья 800
English Wealden Fossils 700
Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger Faszinierende Lauerjäger 600
Distribution Dependent Stochastic Differential Equations 500
A new species of Coccus (Homoptera: Coccoidea) from Malawi 500
A new species of Velataspis (Hemiptera Coccoidea Diaspididae) from tea in Assam 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3157464
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2808880
关于积分的说明 7878772
捐赠科研通 2467260
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1313299
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 630393
版权声明 601919