Association of Daily Step Count and Step Intensity With Mortality Among US Adults

医学 节奏 四分位数 体质指数 全国健康与营养检查调查 危险系数 比例危险模型 冲程(发动机) 物理疗法 人口学 内科学 人口 置信区间 物理医学与康复 社会学 工程类 环境卫生 机械工程
作者
Pedro F. Saint‐Maurice,Richard P. Troiano,David R. Bassett,Barry I. Graubard,Susan A. Carlson,Eric J. Shiroma,Janet E. Fulton,Charles E. Matthews
出处
期刊:JAMA [American Medical Association]
卷期号:323 (12): 1151-1151 被引量:548
标识
DOI:10.1001/jama.2020.1382
摘要

Importance

It is unclear whether the number of steps per day and the intensity of stepping are associated with lower mortality.

Objective

Describe the dose-response relationship between step count and intensity and mortality.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Representative sample of US adults aged at least 40 years in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey who wore an accelerometer for up to 7 days ( from 2003-2006). Mortality was ascertained through December 2015.

Exposures

Accelerometer-measured number of steps per day and 3 step intensity measures (extended bout cadence, peak 30-minute cadence, and peak 1-minute cadence [steps/min]). Accelerometer data were based on measurements obtained during a 7-day period at baseline.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer mortality. Hazard ratios (HRs), mortality rates, and 95% CIs were estimated using cubic splines and quartile classifications adjusting for age; sex; race/ethnicity; education; diet; smoking status; body mass index; self-reported health; mobility limitations; and diagnoses of diabetes, stroke, heart disease, heart failure, cancer, chronic bronchitis, and emphysema.

Results

A total of 4840 participants (mean age, 56.8 years; 2435 [54%] women; 1732 [36%] individuals with obesity) wore accelerometers for a mean of 5.7 days for a mean of 14.4 hours per day. The mean number of steps per day was 9124. There were 1165 deaths over a mean 10.1 years of follow-up, including 406 CVD and 283 cancer deaths. The unadjusted incidence density for all-cause mortality was 76.7 per 1000 person-years (419 deaths) for the 655 individuals who took less than 4000 steps per day; 21.4 per 1000 person-years (488 deaths) for the 1727 individuals who took 4000 to 7999 steps per day; 6.9 per 1000 person-years (176 deaths) for the 1539 individuals who took 8000 to 11 999 steps per day; and 4.8 per 1000 person-years (82 deaths) for the 919 individuals who took at least 12 000 steps per day. Compared with taking 4000 steps per day, taking 8000 steps per day was associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality (HR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.44-0.55]), as was taking 12 000 steps per day (HR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.28-0.45]). Unadjusted incidence density for all-cause mortality by peak 30 cadence was 32.9 per 1000 person-years (406 deaths) for the 1080 individuals who took 18.5 to 56.0 steps per minute; 12.6 per 1000 person-years (207 deaths) for the 1153 individuals who took 56.1 to 69.2 steps per minute; 6.8 per 1000 person-years (124 deaths) for the 1074 individuals who took 69.3 to 82.8 steps per minute; and 5.3 per 1000 person-years (108 deaths) for the 1037 individuals who took 82.9 to 149.5 steps per minute. Greater step intensity was not significantly associated with lower mortality after adjustment for total steps per day (eg, highest vs lowest quartile of peak 30 cadence: HR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.65-1.27];Pvalue for trend = .34).

Conclusions and Relevance

Based on a representative sample of US adults, a greater number of daily steps was significantly associated with lower all-cause mortality. There was no significant association between step intensity and mortality after adjusting for total steps per day.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
实验室应助天天采纳,获得200
刚刚
maoqiuzhao发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
细心的傥发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
万能图书馆应助www采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
汉堡包应助南非的猫采纳,获得10
2秒前
刘郁白完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
CodeCraft应助是杰宝呀采纳,获得10
3秒前
云朵发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
5秒前
tinneywu完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
Lucas应助zhhong采纳,获得10
6秒前
健忘梦凡完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
clearlove发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
腾飞完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
海比天蓝发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
香蕉觅云应助贿猫采纳,获得10
8秒前
lk发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
jxr完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
可爱的函函应助CPPPPPP3采纳,获得10
10秒前
frankk发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
淡然冬灵应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
12秒前
songsong完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
慕青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
浮游应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
浮游应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
无花果应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
12秒前
所所应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
林正心发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
asdfzxcv应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, 2nd Edition 8000
Comprehensive Methanol Science Production, Applications, and Emerging Technologies 2000
Building Quantum Computers 800
Translanguaging in Action in English-Medium Classrooms: A Resource Book for Teachers 700
Exosomes Pipeline Insight, 2025 500
Red Book: 2024–2027 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5656468
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4803520
关于积分的说明 15075928
捐赠科研通 4814762
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2575957
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1531260
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1489863