中止
观察研究
萧条(经济学)
抗抑郁药
重性抑郁障碍
内科学
医学
心理学
随机对照试验
儿科
精神科
认知
焦虑
宏观经济学
经济
作者
Isabel M. Berwian,Julia Wenzel,Anne Collins,Erich Seifritz,Klaas Ε. Stephan,Henrik Walter,Quentin J. M. Huys
出处
期刊:JAMA Psychiatry
[American Medical Association]
日期:2020-02-19
卷期号:77 (5): 513-513
被引量:83
标识
DOI:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.4971
摘要
Importance
Nearly 1 in 3 patients with major depressive disorder who respond to antidepressants relapse within 6 months of treatment discontinuation. No predictors of relapse exist to guide clinical decision-making in this scenario. Objectives
To establish whether the decision to invest effort for rewards represents a persistent depression process after remission, predicts relapse after remission, and is affected by antidepressant discontinuation. Design, Setting, and Participants
This longitudinal randomized observational prognostic study in a Swiss and German university setting collected data from July 1, 2015, to January 31, 2019, from 66 healthy controls and 123 patients in remission from major depressive disorder in response to antidepressants prior to and after discontinuation. Study recruitment took place until January 2018. Exposure
Discontinuation of antidepressants. Main Outcomes and Measures
Relapse during the 6 months after discontinuation. Choice and decision times on a task requiring participants to choose how much effort to exert for various amounts of reward and the mechanisms identified through parameters of a computational model. Results
A total of 123 patients (mean [SD] age, 34.5 [11.2] years; 94 women [76%]) and 66 healthy controls (mean [SD] age, 34.6 [11.0] years; 49 women [74%]) were recruited. In the main subsample, mean (SD) decision times were slower for patients (n = 74) compared with controls (n = 34) (1.77 [0.38] seconds vs 1.61 [0.37] seconds; Cohend = 0.52;P = .02), particularly for those who later relapsed after discontinuation of antidepressants (n = 21) compared with those who did not relapse (n = 39) (1.95 [0.40] seconds vs 1.67 [0.34] seconds; Cohend = 0.77;P < .001). This slower decision time predicted relapse (accuracy = 0.66;P = .007). Patients invested less effort than healthy controls for rewards (F1,98 = 33.970;P < .001). Computational modeling identified a mean (SD) deviation from standard drift-diffusion models that was more prominent for patients than controls (patients, 0.67 [1.56]; controls, –0.71 [1.93]; Cohend = 0.82;P < .001). Patients also showed higher mean (SD) effort sensitivity than controls (patients, 0.31 [0.92]; controls, –0.08 [1.03]; Cohend = 0.51;P = .05). Relapsers differed from nonrelapsers in terms of the evidence required to make a decision for the low-effort choice (mean [SD]: relapsers, 1.36 [0.35]; nonrelapsers, 1.17 [0.26]; Cohend = 0.65;P = .02). Group differences generally did not reach significance in the smaller replication sample (27 patients and 21 controls), but decision time prediction models from the main sample generalized to the replication sample (validation accuracy = 0.71;P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance
This study found that the decision to invest effort was associated with prospective relapse risk after antidepressant discontinuation and may represent a persistent disease process in asymptomatic remitted major depressive disorder. Markers based on effort-related decision-making could potentially inform clinical decisions associated with antidepressant discontinuation.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI