Usefulness and Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Patient Questions for Neurosurgical Procedures

有用性 医学 可读性 聊天机器人 医学物理学 常见问题 人工智能 心理学 医学教育 理解力 社会心理学 计算机科学 程序设计语言
作者
Avi A. Gajjar,Rohit Prem Kumar,Ethan D. Paliwoda,Cathleen C. Kuo,Samuel Adida,Andrew D. Legarreta,Hansen Deng,Sharath Kumar Anand,D. Kojo Hamilton,Thomas J. Buell,Nitin Agarwal,Peter C. Gerszten,Joseph S. Hudson
出处
期刊:Neurosurgery [Oxford University Press]
被引量:13
标识
DOI:10.1227/neu.0000000000002856
摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Internet has become a primary source of health information, leading patients to seek answers online before consulting health care providers. This study aims to evaluate the implementation of Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) in neurosurgery by assessing the accuracy and helpfulness of artificial intelligence (AI)–generated responses to common postsurgical questions. METHODS: A list of 60 commonly asked questions regarding neurosurgical procedures was developed. ChatGPT-3.0, ChatGPT-3.5, and ChatGPT-4.0 responses to these questions were recorded and graded by numerous practitioners for accuracy and helpfulness. The understandability and actionability of the answers were assessed using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool. Readability analysis was conducted using established scales. RESULTS: A total of 1080 responses were evaluated, equally divided among ChatGPT-3.0, 3.5, and 4.0, each contributing 360 responses. The mean helpfulness score across the 3 subsections was 3.511 ± 0.647 while the accuracy score was 4.165 ± 0.567. The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool analysis revealed that the AI-generated responses had higher actionability scores than understandability. This indicates that the answers provided practical guidance and recommendations that patients could apply effectively. On the other hand, the mean Flesch Reading Ease score was 33.5, suggesting that the readability level of the responses was relatively complex. The Raygor Readability Estimate scores ranged within the graduate level, with an average score of the 15th grade. CONCLUSION: The artificial intelligence chatbot's responses, although factually accurate, were not rated highly beneficial, with only marginal differences in perceived helpfulness and accuracy between ChatGPT-3.0 and ChatGPT-3.5 versions. Despite this, the responses from ChatGPT-4.0 showed a notable improvement in understandability, indicating enhanced readability over earlier versions.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
zjc发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
张三坟应助辛桥采纳,获得30
1秒前
雨木目完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
犹豫若云发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
3秒前
feixue发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
e任思完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
李东洋完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
一念之间完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
内含子完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
青青儿发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
zj发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
9秒前
安乐完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
可爱因子完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
琳琳发布了新的文献求助20
10秒前
今后应助mlml采纳,获得10
11秒前
道为完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
成就寒珊发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
科研通AI2S应助满意饼干采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
皇甫藏鸟完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
13秒前
杭啊发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
脑洞疼应助nano采纳,获得10
13秒前
Sen277发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
14秒前
14秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助superlkz采纳,获得10
14秒前
14秒前
inkyxia发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
可爱的函函应助nenoaowu采纳,获得50
15秒前
hhh应助leo_0703采纳,获得10
15秒前
桓某人发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
balipon完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
高分求助中
Evolution 2024
Impact of Mitophagy-Related Genes on the Diagnosis and Development of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma via Single-Cell RNA-seq Analysis and Machine Learning Algorithms 2000
Experimental investigation of the mechanics of explosive welding by means of a liquid analogue 1060
Die Elektra-Partitur von Richard Strauss : ein Lehrbuch für die Technik der dramatischen Komposition 1000
CLSI EP47 Evaluation of Reagent Carryover Effects on Test Results, 1st Edition 600
大平正芳: 「戦後保守」とは何か 550
Sustainability in ’Tides Chemistry 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3006946
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2666293
关于积分的说明 7230222
捐赠科研通 2303372
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1221386
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 595204
版权声明 593358