医学
肝素
血液透析
导管
外科
临床终点
血液透析导管
中期分析
危险系数
人口
随机对照试验
置信区间
内科学
环境卫生
作者
Anil Agarwal,Prabir Roy‐Chaudhury,Phoebe Mounts,Elizabeth Hurlburt,Antony Pfaffle,Eugene C. Poggio
出处
期刊:Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology
[American Society of Nephrology]
日期:2023-09-06
卷期号:18 (11): 1446-1455
被引量:9
标识
DOI:10.2215/cjn.0000000000000278
摘要
Background Catheter‐related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) are one of the most prevalent, fatal, and costly complications of hemodialysis with a central venous catheter (CVC). The LOCK IT-100 trial compared the efficacy and safety of a taurolidine/heparin catheter lock solution that combines taurolidine 13.5 mg/ml and heparin (1000 units/ml) versus heparin in preventing CRBSIs in participants receiving hemodialysis via CVC. Methods LOCK IT-100 was a randomized, double-blind, active-control, multicenter, phase 3 study that enrolled adults with kidney failure undergoing maintenance hemodialysis via CVC from 70 US sites. Participants were randomized 1:1 to taurolidine/heparin catheter lock solution or heparin control catheter lock solution (1000 units/ml). The primary end point was time to CRBSI as assessed by a blinded Clinical Adjudication Committee. Secondary end points were catheter removal for any reason and loss of catheter patency. On the basis of a prespecified interim analysis, the Data and Safety Monitoring Board recommended terminating the trial early for efficacy with no safety concerns. Results In the full analysis population ( N =795), nine participants in the taurolidine/heparin arm ( n =397; 2%) and 32 participants in the heparin arm ( n =398; 8%) had a CRBSI. Event rates per 1000 catheter days were 0.13 and 0.46, respectively, with the difference in time to CRBSI being statistically significant, favoring taurolidine/heparin ( P < 0.001). The hazard ratio was 0.29 (95% confidence interval, 0.14 to 0.62), corresponding to a 71% reduction in risk of CRBSIs with taurolidine/heparin versus heparin. There were no significant differences between study arms in time to catheter removal for any reason or loss of catheter patency. The safety of taurolidine/heparin was comparable with that of heparin, and most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild or moderate. Conclusions Taurolidine/heparin reduced the risk of developing a CRBSI in study participants receiving hemodialysis via CVC compared with heparin with a comparable safety profile. Clinical Trial registry name and registration number Study Assessing Safety & Effectiveness of a Catheter Lock Solution in Dialysis Patients to Prevent Bloodstream Infection, NCT02651428.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI