Oral versus intravenous antibiotic therapy for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia or endocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

医学 随机对照试验 菌血症 荟萃分析 科克伦图书馆 心内膜炎 内科学 相对风险 不利影响 静脉治疗 置信区间 梅德林 重症监护医学 抗生素 微生物学 生物 政治学 法学
作者
Ahmad Mourad,Nnamdi Nwafo,Lesley A. Skalla,Thomas L Holland,Timothy C Jenkins
出处
期刊:Clinical Infectious Diseases [Oxford University Press]
被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1093/cid/ciae476
摘要

Abstract Background We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to generate more precise estimates of the efficacy and safety of oral versus intravenous antibiotic therapy for S. aureus bacteremia or endocarditis. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science database were searched through February 21st, 2024. RCTs were included if they compared oral versus intravenous antibiotic therapy for S. aureus bacteremia or endocarditis, and appropriately reported outcomes for each group. Risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials. Heterogeneity between studies was evaluated with the Cochran’s Q-statistic and I2 test. Treatment effects were summarized with pooled risk ratios using a random effects model meta-analysis. (PROSPERO CRD42024481512) Results Only four RCTs met criteria for inclusion in meta-analysis. Among participants assessed for treatment failure, there was no difference between the oral and intravenous therapy groups (RR 0.99; 95% CI, 0.63–1.57; I2 = 0%). There was also no significant difference in adverse events between oral and intravenous therapy groups (RR 0.65; 95% CI, 0.07–5.94; I2 = 74%); however, the confidence interval is wide, and heterogeneity was high. Conclusions In this systematic review of RCTs comparing oral to intravenous antibiotic therapy for S. aureus bacteremia or endocarditis, few studies met eligibility criteria for inclusion. Meta-analysis of these studies suggests that transitioning from intravenous to oral therapy is likely effective in a subgroup of carefully selected patients. Additional randomized trials are necessary before transition to oral therapy can be routinely recommended.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
李兴完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
kira发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
辣辣发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
kiki完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
家欣完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
Xu完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
风趣姿完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
早睡早起身体好完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
十三应助Y0Y0采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
感动代双完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
韩凡发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
万能图书馆应助isabellae采纳,获得10
9秒前
昊昊完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
XIAOWANG发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
裴向雪发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
qqaazz完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
Nicho完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
zou发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
快乐小王完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
吞吞完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
Yy杨优秀完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
qqaazz关注了科研通微信公众号
15秒前
常常完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
17秒前
言无间发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
怕孤单的安蕾完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
FashionBoy应助Yuan采纳,获得10
18秒前
18秒前
19秒前
森森完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
十一苗发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
爱听歌凤灵完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
24秒前
25秒前
Lucy发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
27秒前
28秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind 1000
Technical Brochure TB 814: LPIT applications in HV gas insulated switchgear 1000
Immigrant Incorporation in East Asian Democracies 600
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 500
不知道标题是什么 500
A Preliminary Study on Correlation Between Independent Components of Facial Thermal Images and Subjective Assessment of Chronic Stress 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3967722
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3512889
关于积分的说明 11165380
捐赠科研通 3247919
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1794067
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 874836
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 804578