Novel application of latent class analysis to outcome assessment in traumatic brain injury with multiple injury subtypes or poly-TBI

创伤性脑损伤 医学 格拉斯哥昏迷指数 格拉斯哥结局量表 蛛网膜下腔出血 内科学 外科 精神科
作者
Samuel Doty,Jordan C. Petitt,Ahmed Kashkoush,Benjamin B. Whiting,Tianqi Xiao,John Francis,Douglas D. Gunzler,Mary Joan Roach,Michael L. Kelly
出处
期刊:Journal of Neurosurgery [Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group]
卷期号:: 1-8
标识
DOI:10.3171/2024.5.jns232842
摘要

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to stratify poly–traumatic brain injury (poly-TBI) patterns into discrete classes and to determine the association of these classes with mortality and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (WLST). METHODS The authors performed a single-center retrospective review of their institutional trauma registry from 2018 to 2020 to identify patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Patients were included if they had moderate to severe TBI, defined as Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤ 12 and Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) head score ≥ 3, and the presence of more than one TBI subtype. TBI subtypes were defined as subdural hemorrhage (SDH), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), and epidural hemorrhage (EDH). Latent class analysis was used to identify patient classes based on TBI subtypes and Rotterdam CT (RCT) scores. The authors then evaluated class membership in relation to categorical outcomes of in-hospital mortality and WLST by using Lanza et al.’s method. RESULTS A total of 125 patients met inclusion criteria for poly-TBI. Latent class analysis yielded 3 poly-TBI classes: class 1–mixed; class 2–SDH/SAH; and class 3–EDH/SAH. Class 1–mixed had a higher likelihood of SDH, SAH, and ICH, and a lower likelihood of EDH. Class 2–SDH/SAH had a higher likelihood of only SDH and SAH. Class 3–EDH/SAH had a higher likelihood of EDH and SAH, and a lower likelihood of SDH and ICH. Class 1–mixed was relatively more likely to have an RCT score of 2. Class 2–SDH/SAH was relatively more likely to have an RCT score of 2, 3, and 4. Class 3–EDH/SAH had a higher likelihood of an RCT score of 3, 4, and 5. Class 1–mixed had significantly lower mortality (χ 2 = 7.968; p = 0.005) and less WLST (χ 2 = 4.618; p = 0.032) than Class 2–SDH/SAH. Class 2–SDH/SAH had the highest probability of death (0.612), followed by class 3–EDH/SAH (0.385) and class 1–mixed (0.277). Similarly, class 2–SDH/SAH had the highest WLST probability (0.498), followed by class 3–EDH/SAH (0.615) and class 1–mixed (0.238). CONCLUSIONS Distinct poly-TBI classes were associated with increased in-hospital mortality and WLST. Further research with larger datasets will allow for more comprehensive poly-TBI class definitions and outcomes analysis.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
kkkl发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
王广富完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
不配.给傲娇梦旋的求助进行了留言
4秒前
sakuraroad发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
dhdafwet发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
领导范儿应助Lee采纳,获得10
6秒前
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
Ada完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
Ash完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
qunli发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
加贝木杉完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
月夜孤影完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
xol发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
Singularity应助小玲采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
JTHe应助小玲采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
宓沂发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
爆米花应助kkkl采纳,获得10
12秒前
333333发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
宜醉宜游宜睡应助dan1029采纳,获得10
13秒前
奋斗的荆完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
搜集达人应助dan1029采纳,获得10
13秒前
小二郎应助dan1029采纳,获得10
13秒前
bkagyin应助dan1029采纳,获得10
13秒前
无花果应助dan1029采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
烟花应助dan1029采纳,获得10
13秒前
lankeren完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
14秒前
jane完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
完美的尔蓝完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
MT完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
高分求助中
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2000
Bayesian Models of Cognition:Reverse Engineering the Mind 800
Essentials of thematic analysis 700
A Dissection Guide & Atlas to the Rabbit 600
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 568
Внешняя политика КНР: о сущности внешнеполитического курса современного китайского руководства 500
Revolution und Konterrevolution in China [by A. Losowsky] 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3123986
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2774419
关于积分的说明 7722418
捐赠科研通 2429958
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1290833
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 621957
版权声明 600283