Pediatric distal third tibial shaft fractures: a comparison of surgical fixation methods and incidence of concomitant physeal fractures

The purposeof this study was to compare outcomes of operatively treated pediatric distal third tibial shaft fractures fixed with elastic nailing or plate fixation and to evaluate the incidence of concurrent distal tibia physeal fractures. Retrospective review identified skeletally immature patients that underwent operative fixation of distal third tibia fractures at a level 1 children’s hospital from 2010 to 2020. Patient and fracture characteristics were recorded. Analysis of treatment outcomes was performed and rates of concurrent distal tibia physeal fractures were evaluated. Of the 214 surgically treated tibial shaft fractures, 43 were distal third fractures. A concurrent distal tibia physeal fracture was present in 32.6% of patients. These were significantly associated with spiral distal third tibial shaft fractures. The presence of concurrent physeal fractures did not affect patient treatment outcomes. Comparing elastic nailing versus open reduction and plating revealed no difference with time to fracture union, time of postoperative immobilization, or time to full weight-bearing. While elastic nailing was associated with increased coronal angulation, translation, and shortening of fractures on initial postoperative imaging, there was no difference in rates of malunion at final follow-up. In our series, there were no differences in treatment outcomes based on fixation method. Our operatively treated distal third tibial shaft fractures had a higher rate of associated distal tibial physeal fractures than previously published in the pediatric orthopedic literature. We recommend careful evaluation of the ankle for concurrent physeal injuries in patients with distal third tibial shaft fractures indicated for operative treatment. Level of evidence: level III therapeutic study – retrospective comparative study.