Developing a National Trauma Research Action Plan: Results from the long-term outcomes research gap Delphi survey

德尔菲法 行动计划 利克特量表 德尔菲 医学 概化理论 心理学 人口 医学教育 家庭医学 护理部 计算机科学 管理 环境卫生 发展心理学 人工智能 经济 操作系统
作者
Juan P. Herrera-Escobar,Emma Reidy,Jimmy Phuong,Karen J. Brasel,Joseph Cuschieri,Mary Fallat,Benjamin K. Potter,Michelle A. Price,Eileen M. Bulger,Adil H. Haider,Stephanie Bonne,Karen J. Brasel,Joseph Cuschieri,Terri de Roon-Cassini,Rochelle A. Dicker,Mary Fallat,James R. Ficke,Belinda Gabbe,Nicole S. Gibran,Allen W. Heinemann,Vanessa Ho,Lillian S. Kao,James F. Kellam,Brad G. Kurowski,Nomi C. Levy-Carrick,David Livingston,Samuel P. Mandell,Geoffrey T. Manley,Christopher P. Michetti,Anna N. Miller,Anna Newcomb,David Okonkwo,Benjamin K. Potter,Mark Seamon,Deborah Stein,Amy K. Wagner,John Whyte,Peter Yonclas,Douglas Zatzick,Martin D. Zielinski
标识
DOI:10.1097/ta.0000000000003747
摘要

In Brief Export BACKGROUND In the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2016 report on trauma care, the establishment of a National Trauma Research Action Plan to strengthen and guide future trauma research was recommended. To address this recommendation, the Department of Defense funded the Coalition for National Trauma Research to generate a comprehensive research agenda spanning the continuum of trauma and burn care. We describe the gap analysis and high-priority research questions generated from the National Trauma Research Action Plan panel on long-term outcomes. METHODS Experts in long-term outcomes were recruited to identify current gaps in long-term trauma outcomes research, generate research questions, and establish the priority for these questions using a consensus-driven, Delphi survey approach from February 2021 to August 2021. Panelists were identified using established Delphi recruitment guidelines to ensure heterogeneity and generalizability including both military and civilian representation. Panelists were encouraged to use a PICO format to generate research questions: Patient/Population, Intervention, Compare/Control, and Outcome model. On subsequent surveys, panelists were asked to prioritize each research question on a 9-point Likert scale, categorized to represent low-, medium-, and high-priority items. Consensus was defined as ≥60% of panelists agreeing on the priority category. RESULTS Thirty-two subject matter experts generated 482 questions in 17 long-term outcome topic areas. By Round 3 of the Delphi, 359 questions (75%) reached consensus, of which 107 (30%) were determined to be high priority, 252 (70%) medium priority, and 0 (0%) low priority. Substance abuse and pain was the topic area with the highest number of questions. Health services (not including mental health or rehabilitation) (64%), mental health (46%), and geriatric population (43%) were the topic areas with the highest proportion of high-priority questions. CONCLUSION This Delphi gap analysis of long-term trauma outcomes research identified 107 high-priority research questions that will help guide investigators in future long-term outcomes research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Diagnostic Tests or Criteria; Level IV. Research on long-term trauma outcomes is scant and must be prioritized as a whole. In this consensus-driven Delphi survey, the most prevalent topic areas among high priority research questions are mental health, post-discharge health services, and the geriatric population.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
bk2020113458完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助50
2秒前
Jessie发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
Akim应助古月采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
bkagyin应助牛牛采纳,获得10
6秒前
Luo发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
9秒前
xiaozhuzhu完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
nihaoxjm发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
亦玉完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
无聊的南松完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
Orange应助古月采纳,获得10
16秒前
16秒前
悦耳的咖啡豆完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
dingz完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
领导范儿应助怡然小蚂蚁采纳,获得10
20秒前
21秒前
共享精神应助金金钟采纳,获得30
21秒前
严念桃完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
SYLH应助Bob采纳,获得10
24秒前
昏睡的汉堡完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
FashionBoy应助m0405采纳,获得10
24秒前
虚心的飞雪完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
ding应助月亮不睡我不睡采纳,获得10
25秒前
25秒前
优秀笑寒完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
CipherSage应助古月采纳,获得10
27秒前
29秒前
29秒前
梓亮发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
Zsilu完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
易槐完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
34秒前
34秒前
金金钟发布了新的文献求助30
35秒前
高分求助中
The Mother of All Tableaux Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 2400
Ophthalmic Equipment Market by Devices(surgical: vitreorentinal,IOLs,OVDs,contact lens,RGP lens,backflush,diagnostic&monitoring:OCT,actorefractor,keratometer,tonometer,ophthalmoscpe,OVD), End User,Buying Criteria-Global Forecast to2029 2000
Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind 1000
Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind (Sixth Edition) 1000
Optimal Transport: A Comprehensive Introduction to Modeling, Analysis, Simulation, Applications 800
Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL 600
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 588
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3958225
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3504388
关于积分的说明 11118283
捐赠科研通 3235682
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1788411
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 871211
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 802565