Developing a National Trauma Research Action Plan: Results from the long-term outcomes research gap Delphi survey

德尔菲法 行动计划 利克特量表 德尔菲 医学 概化理论 心理学 人口 医学教育 家庭医学 护理部 计算机科学 管理 环境卫生 发展心理学 人工智能 经济 操作系统
作者
Juan P. Herrera-Escobar,Emma Reidy,Jimmy Phuong,Karen J. Brasel,Joseph Cuschieri,Mary Fallat,Benjamin K. Potter,Michelle A. Price,Eileen M. Bulger,Adil H. Haider,Stephanie Bonne,Karen J. Brasel,Joseph Cuschieri,Terri de Roon-Cassini,Rochelle A. Dicker,Mary Fallat,James R. Ficke,Belinda Gabbe,Nicole S. Gibran,Allen W. Heinemann,Vanessa Ho,Lillian S. Kao,James F. Kellam,Brad G. Kurowski,Nomi C. Levy-Carrick,David Livingston,Samuel P. Mandell,Geoffrey T. Manley,Christopher P. Michetti,Anna N. Miller,Anna Newcomb,David Okonkwo,Benjamin K. Potter,Mark Seamon,Deborah Stein,Amy K. Wagner,John Whyte,Peter Yonclas,Douglas Zatzick,Martin D. Zielinski
标识
DOI:10.1097/ta.0000000000003747
摘要

In Brief Export BACKGROUND In the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2016 report on trauma care, the establishment of a National Trauma Research Action Plan to strengthen and guide future trauma research was recommended. To address this recommendation, the Department of Defense funded the Coalition for National Trauma Research to generate a comprehensive research agenda spanning the continuum of trauma and burn care. We describe the gap analysis and high-priority research questions generated from the National Trauma Research Action Plan panel on long-term outcomes. METHODS Experts in long-term outcomes were recruited to identify current gaps in long-term trauma outcomes research, generate research questions, and establish the priority for these questions using a consensus-driven, Delphi survey approach from February 2021 to August 2021. Panelists were identified using established Delphi recruitment guidelines to ensure heterogeneity and generalizability including both military and civilian representation. Panelists were encouraged to use a PICO format to generate research questions: Patient/Population, Intervention, Compare/Control, and Outcome model. On subsequent surveys, panelists were asked to prioritize each research question on a 9-point Likert scale, categorized to represent low-, medium-, and high-priority items. Consensus was defined as ≥60% of panelists agreeing on the priority category. RESULTS Thirty-two subject matter experts generated 482 questions in 17 long-term outcome topic areas. By Round 3 of the Delphi, 359 questions (75%) reached consensus, of which 107 (30%) were determined to be high priority, 252 (70%) medium priority, and 0 (0%) low priority. Substance abuse and pain was the topic area with the highest number of questions. Health services (not including mental health or rehabilitation) (64%), mental health (46%), and geriatric population (43%) were the topic areas with the highest proportion of high-priority questions. CONCLUSION This Delphi gap analysis of long-term trauma outcomes research identified 107 high-priority research questions that will help guide investigators in future long-term outcomes research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Diagnostic Tests or Criteria; Level IV. Research on long-term trauma outcomes is scant and must be prioritized as a whole. In this consensus-driven Delphi survey, the most prevalent topic areas among high priority research questions are mental health, post-discharge health services, and the geriatric population.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
闪闪飞机发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
打打应助蔡蔡不菜菜采纳,获得10
刚刚
艺玲发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
1秒前
坚果发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
宋嬴一发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
sweetbearm应助丞诺采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
情怀应助缥缈的碧萱采纳,获得10
1秒前
一株多肉完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
柯柯完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
是赤赤呀完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
阮人雄完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
王饱饱完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
Mr_Hao完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
Keira_Chang完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
起承转合完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
风姿物语完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
xiaopeng完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
Jenny应助艺玲采纳,获得10
5秒前
一平发布了新的文献求助80
5秒前
樱桃味的火苗完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
波波完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
322628完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
领导范儿应助silong采纳,获得10
6秒前
身为风帆发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
applepie完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
顾己完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
宋嬴一完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
我超爱cs完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
沉静哲瀚完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
MADKAI发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
喝汤一样完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
wormzjl发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
虚拟的眼神完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
陈_Ccc完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Social media impact on athlete mental health: #RealityCheck 1020
Ensartinib (Ensacove) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 1000
Unseen Mendieta: The Unpublished Works of Ana Mendieta 1000
Bacterial collagenases and their clinical applications 800
El viaje de una vida: Memorias de María Lecea 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3527304
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3107454
关于积分的说明 9285518
捐赠科研通 2805269
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1539827
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 716708
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 709672