Developing a National Trauma Research Action Plan: Results from the long-term outcomes research gap Delphi survey

德尔菲法 行动计划 利克特量表 德尔菲 医学 概化理论 心理学 人口 医学教育 家庭医学 护理部 计算机科学 管理 环境卫生 发展心理学 人工智能 经济 操作系统
作者
Juan P. Herrera-Escobar,Emma Reidy,Jimmy Phuong,Karen J. Brasel,Joseph Cuschieri,Mary Fallat,Benjamin K. Potter,Michelle A. Price,Eileen M. Bulger,Adil H. Haider,Stephanie Bonne,Karen J. Brasel,Joseph Cuschieri,Terri de Roon-Cassini,Rochelle A. Dicker,Mary Fallat,James R. Ficke,Belinda Gabbe,Nicole S. Gibran,Allen W. Heinemann,Vanessa Ho,Lillian S. Kao,James F. Kellam,Brad G. Kurowski,Nomi C. Levy-Carrick,David Livingston,Samuel P. Mandell,Geoffrey T. Manley,Christopher P. Michetti,Anna N. Miller,Anna Newcomb,David Okonkwo,Benjamin K. Potter,Mark Seamon,Deborah Stein,Amy K. Wagner,John Whyte,Peter Yonclas,Douglas Zatzick,Martin D. Zielinski
标识
DOI:10.1097/ta.0000000000003747
摘要

In Brief Export BACKGROUND In the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2016 report on trauma care, the establishment of a National Trauma Research Action Plan to strengthen and guide future trauma research was recommended. To address this recommendation, the Department of Defense funded the Coalition for National Trauma Research to generate a comprehensive research agenda spanning the continuum of trauma and burn care. We describe the gap analysis and high-priority research questions generated from the National Trauma Research Action Plan panel on long-term outcomes. METHODS Experts in long-term outcomes were recruited to identify current gaps in long-term trauma outcomes research, generate research questions, and establish the priority for these questions using a consensus-driven, Delphi survey approach from February 2021 to August 2021. Panelists were identified using established Delphi recruitment guidelines to ensure heterogeneity and generalizability including both military and civilian representation. Panelists were encouraged to use a PICO format to generate research questions: Patient/Population, Intervention, Compare/Control, and Outcome model. On subsequent surveys, panelists were asked to prioritize each research question on a 9-point Likert scale, categorized to represent low-, medium-, and high-priority items. Consensus was defined as ≥60% of panelists agreeing on the priority category. RESULTS Thirty-two subject matter experts generated 482 questions in 17 long-term outcome topic areas. By Round 3 of the Delphi, 359 questions (75%) reached consensus, of which 107 (30%) were determined to be high priority, 252 (70%) medium priority, and 0 (0%) low priority. Substance abuse and pain was the topic area with the highest number of questions. Health services (not including mental health or rehabilitation) (64%), mental health (46%), and geriatric population (43%) were the topic areas with the highest proportion of high-priority questions. CONCLUSION This Delphi gap analysis of long-term trauma outcomes research identified 107 high-priority research questions that will help guide investigators in future long-term outcomes research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Diagnostic Tests or Criteria; Level IV. Research on long-term trauma outcomes is scant and must be prioritized as a whole. In this consensus-driven Delphi survey, the most prevalent topic areas among high priority research questions are mental health, post-discharge health services, and the geriatric population.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
小乖完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
kryptonite完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
7秒前
烟花应助禾盒采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
Mchong发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
搜集达人应助用心若镜2采纳,获得10
9秒前
Wing完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
爱科研的光催人完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
12秒前
曾高高发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
领导范儿应助hesongwen采纳,获得10
12秒前
lihe198900完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
小橙完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
困敦发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
16秒前
沉静的万天完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
一路高飛完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
dhd发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
背后的桐发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
禾盒发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
20秒前
遗迹小白完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
风趣的茹嫣完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
桐桐应助符雁采纳,获得10
23秒前
ET发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
25秒前
iWatchTheMoon应助陈生采纳,获得10
28秒前
31秒前
31秒前
31秒前
32秒前
ET完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
雪飞杨完成签到 ,获得积分10
32秒前
32秒前
高分求助中
Evolution 10000
ISSN 2159-8274 EISSN 2159-8290 1000
Becoming: An Introduction to Jung's Concept of Individuation 600
Ore genesis in the Zambian Copperbelt with particular reference to the northern sector of the Chambishi basin 500
A new species of Coccus (Homoptera: Coccoidea) from Malawi 500
A new species of Velataspis (Hemiptera Coccoidea Diaspididae) from tea in Assam 500
PraxisRatgeber: Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3162987
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2813990
关于积分的说明 7902734
捐赠科研通 2473613
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1316952
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 631560
版权声明 602187