Developing a National Trauma Research Action Plan: Results from the long-term outcomes research gap Delphi survey

德尔菲法 行动计划 利克特量表 德尔菲 医学 概化理论 心理学 人口 医学教育 家庭医学 护理部 计算机科学 管理 环境卫生 发展心理学 人工智能 经济 操作系统
作者
Juan P. Herrera-Escobar,Emma Reidy,Jimmy Phuong,Karen J. Brasel,Joseph Cuschieri,Mary Fallat,Benjamin K. Potter,Michelle A. Price,Eileen M. Bulger,Adil H. Haider,Stephanie Bonne,Karen J. Brasel,Joseph Cuschieri,Terri de Roon-Cassini,Rochelle A. Dicker,Mary Fallat,James R. Ficke,Belinda Gabbe,Nicole S. Gibran,Allen W. Heinemann,Vanessa Ho,Lillian S. Kao,James F. Kellam,Brad G. Kurowski,Nomi C. Levy-Carrick,David Livingston,Samuel P. Mandell,Geoffrey T. Manley,Christopher P. Michetti,Anna N. Miller,Anna Newcomb,David Okonkwo,Benjamin K. Potter,Mark Seamon,Deborah Stein,Amy K. Wagner,John Whyte,Peter Yonclas,Douglas Zatzick,Martin D. Zielinski
标识
DOI:10.1097/ta.0000000000003747
摘要

In Brief Export BACKGROUND In the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2016 report on trauma care, the establishment of a National Trauma Research Action Plan to strengthen and guide future trauma research was recommended. To address this recommendation, the Department of Defense funded the Coalition for National Trauma Research to generate a comprehensive research agenda spanning the continuum of trauma and burn care. We describe the gap analysis and high-priority research questions generated from the National Trauma Research Action Plan panel on long-term outcomes. METHODS Experts in long-term outcomes were recruited to identify current gaps in long-term trauma outcomes research, generate research questions, and establish the priority for these questions using a consensus-driven, Delphi survey approach from February 2021 to August 2021. Panelists were identified using established Delphi recruitment guidelines to ensure heterogeneity and generalizability including both military and civilian representation. Panelists were encouraged to use a PICO format to generate research questions: Patient/Population, Intervention, Compare/Control, and Outcome model. On subsequent surveys, panelists were asked to prioritize each research question on a 9-point Likert scale, categorized to represent low-, medium-, and high-priority items. Consensus was defined as ≥60% of panelists agreeing on the priority category. RESULTS Thirty-two subject matter experts generated 482 questions in 17 long-term outcome topic areas. By Round 3 of the Delphi, 359 questions (75%) reached consensus, of which 107 (30%) were determined to be high priority, 252 (70%) medium priority, and 0 (0%) low priority. Substance abuse and pain was the topic area with the highest number of questions. Health services (not including mental health or rehabilitation) (64%), mental health (46%), and geriatric population (43%) were the topic areas with the highest proportion of high-priority questions. CONCLUSION This Delphi gap analysis of long-term trauma outcomes research identified 107 high-priority research questions that will help guide investigators in future long-term outcomes research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Diagnostic Tests or Criteria; Level IV. Research on long-term trauma outcomes is scant and must be prioritized as a whole. In this consensus-driven Delphi survey, the most prevalent topic areas among high priority research questions are mental health, post-discharge health services, and the geriatric population.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
粟粟完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
铁皮完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
yyy完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
善良身影完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
知秋发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
安铂辉发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
zyt发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
搜集达人应助ln177采纳,获得10
2秒前
氢氧化完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
kk7555完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
李健应助柠静樨采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
Zachary完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
科研探索者完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
晶晶发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
静心龙完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
稳重的向日葵完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
kwan完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
有魅力怜菡完成签到 ,获得积分20
6秒前
瘦瘦半山完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
xx发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
老孟完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
景三完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
二两白茶完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
cdercder应助蝃蝀采纳,获得10
7秒前
cc发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
水123发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
慈祥的帽子完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
8秒前
zdq10068发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
dl应助king采纳,获得20
9秒前
Boniu_wang完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
12完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Developing Genetic Editing Tools for Lysobacter 2000
Моделирование процессов самоорганизации в кристаллообразующих системах 1000
History of U.S. Space Surveillance and Satellite Cataloging 1000
Adhesion Science: Principles & Practice 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6523609
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8316651
关于积分的说明 17796513
捐赠科研通 5625489
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2928263
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1905081
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1765086