医学
头痛
开颅术
养生
病历
桥小脑角
外科
维拉帕米
麻醉
磁共振成像
内科学
放射科
钙
作者
Matthew B. Hanson,Michael E. Glasscock,Jan Lewis Brandes,C. Gary Jackson
出处
期刊:Laryngoscope
[Wiley]
日期:1998-08-01
卷期号:108 (8): 1111-1114
被引量:31
标识
DOI:10.1097/00005537-199808000-00001
摘要
Abstract Objectives : Suboccipital craniotomy is a frequently used surgical approach for removal of cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumors. A frequently cited consequence, however, is the high incidence of postoperative headaches. Much has been written regarding prevention of these headaches, but little has been written of their treatment. The authors review their extensive experience in suboccipital tumor removal and the medical management of postoperative headache, highlighting the recent use of a regimen of divalproex sodium and verapamil. Study Design : Retrospective chart review. Methods : The charts of a consecutive series of patients having suboccipital craniotomies for CPA tumors were reviewed. Presence, duration, and severity of headache were noted. Medical treatments and their effectiveness were also noted. Results : Between 1980 and 1997, 228 patients underwent suboccipital craniotomy for removal of CPA tumors. Of these patients, 124 (54.4%) complained of headache. For 62 (27.2%) the headaches persisted for more than a year after surgery. Twenty‐nine patients (12.7%) received no relief from any medication. Ten of these patients received a regimen of divalproex sodium and verapamil, with all patients obtaining significant relief. Conclusion : Headache is a significant problem with the suboccipital approach for acoustic tumor removal. The majority of patients that complain of headache can be adequately treated with nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). If pain is unrelieved by NSAIDs, treatment becomes problematic. The authors' early experience with divalproex sodium/verapamil is encouraging and deserves further investigation as a treatment for these refractory cases.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI