Development and Validation of a Condom Self-Efficacy Scale for College Students

避孕套 克朗巴赫阿尔法 比例(比率) 心理学 自我效能感 人口 性交 临床心理学 判别效度 社会心理学 心理测量学 医学 家庭医学 环境卫生 物理 人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV) 内部一致性 梅毒 量子力学
作者
Linda J. Brafford,Kenneth H. Beck
出处
期刊:Journal of American College Health [Informa]
卷期号:39 (5): 219-225 被引量:403
标识
DOI:10.1080/07448481.1991.9936238
摘要

This study proposed to develop and validate a scale for the college population that measures self-efficacy in using condoms. The Condom Use Self-Efficacy Scale (CUSES) was derived from several sources and consisted of 28 items describing an individual's feelings of confidence about being able to purchase condoms, put them on and take them off, and negotiate their use with a new sexual partner. This scale was administered to a sample of 768 college students. It was found to possess adequate reliability (Cronbach's alpha = .91; test-retest correlation = .81) and correlated well with the Attitude Toward the Condom Scale (r = .51) and the Contraceptive Self-Efficacy Scale for women (r = .55). Our scale also correlated with a measure of intention to use condoms (r = .40) but was unrelated to a measure of social desirability. Students who differed on measures of previous condom use as well as on sexual intercourse experience also showed significant differences on this scale in the expected direction, indicating evidence of this scale's discriminant validity. The potential uses of this scale in a college population are discussed, along with the issues underlying condom usage self-efficacy.The methods and validation results of the development of a condom self-efficacy scale (CUSES) for college students is reported. Development of the scale was based on previous literature, an expert panel, and input form 183 college students. 60 items were included in the initial questionnaire and 15 factors were identified as influencing college students; self-efficacy toward condom usage. 28 specific self-efficacy items were then created with a scale ranging from strongly agree to disagree. The 15 factors were 1) personal experience with condoms, 2) embarrassment at purchase, 3) alcohol use, 4) not wanting to offend with the implication of uncleanliness, 5) reduction in excitement, 6) loss of spontaneity, 7) breaking the mood, 8) not being prepared, 9) unsure of partner's feeling about condoms, 10) embarrassment, 11) communication with partner, 12) embarrassment about talking about condoms, 13) afraid of partner's refusal of condom use, 14) ability to maintain an erection, and 15) fear of reputation. The entire survey tested had 124 questions: the 28-item new scale, Brown's Attitude Toward Condom Use (ATC) scale, Levinson's Contraceptive Self Efficacy Scale for women (CSE), a short form of the Marlow-Crowne Social Desirability scale, and 3 outcome measures. Changes were made after 60 students pretested the questionnaire for readability, understanding, and anonymity. Validity scale measures are reported for the other scales used. 803 students were administered the questionnaire during class, but not sex education classes, and 2 weeks later. The demographics are given and were similar to the pretest. The mean score of CUSES was 75.69 )SD=15.50). Cronbach's alpha with 768 cases was .91 and after 2 weeks .81 and are comparable to other reliability coefficients. CUSES correlated significantly with the ATC scale (r=.51, p.001) and the CSE (r=.55, p.001) with evidence of convergent validity. It was significantly correlated with behavioral intentions (r=.40, p.001) and outcome efficacy score of condom users was M=81.31, n=260, and nonusers was M=74.91, n=407, and users mean was significantly greater. Those who had used a condom had significantly higher CUSES scores than those who had not, and those who had a prior sexually transmitted disease (STD) approached a significant difference. There was no significant difference between men and women. A limitation is that the sample was not random, and the measures of behavioral intention and past behavior are self-reports. Although behavioral intention is the best predictor of future behavior, it may not be an accurate measure. The sample was not ethnically or sexually diverse. The confidence with which students felt about some items is discussed and it may be helpful to educators to focus on condom purchase, negotiating condom use with a new partner, and homosexuality and STDs.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
高高高完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
safari发布了新的文献求助30
4秒前
mira发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
yier发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
Hello应助June采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
可爱的函函应助123采纳,获得10
8秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
话藏心完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
莫飞完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
芒果爸爸发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
14秒前
jiajia发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
woleaisa发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
15秒前
ZDW777完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
mira完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
张秉环完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
英俊的铭应助zhu采纳,获得10
18秒前
高兴给浮光的求助进行了留言
19秒前
angelinazh发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
Flori完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
科研通AI6应助繁荣的念双采纳,获得10
23秒前
scgmwwx完成签到 ,获得积分0
25秒前
今后应助June采纳,获得10
25秒前
25秒前
11发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
27秒前
27秒前
天才包发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
芝麻球ii完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
orixero应助茶米采纳,获得10
29秒前
29秒前
李杰发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
angelinazh完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
30秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
List of 1,091 Public Pension Profiles by Region 1581
以液相層析串聯質譜法分析糖漿產品中活性雙羰基化合物 / 吳瑋元[撰] = Analysis of reactive dicarbonyl species in syrup products by LC-MS/MS / Wei-Yuan Wu 1000
Current Trends in Drug Discovery, Development and Delivery (CTD4-2022) 800
Biology of the Reptilia. Volume 21. Morphology I. The Skull and Appendicular Locomotor Apparatus of Lepidosauria 600
The Scope of Slavic Aspect 600
Foregrounding Marking Shift in Sundanese Written Narrative Segments 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5536873
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4624540
关于积分的说明 14592255
捐赠科研通 4564957
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2502101
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1480843
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1452073