清晨好,您是今天最早来到科研通的研友!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您科研之路漫漫前行!

Development and Validation of a Condom Self-Efficacy Scale for College Students

避孕套 克朗巴赫阿尔法 比例(比率) 心理学 自我效能感 人口 性交 临床心理学 判别效度 社会心理学 心理测量学 医学 家庭医学 环境卫生 人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV) 内部一致性 物理 梅毒 量子力学
作者
Linda J. Brafford,Kenneth H. Beck
出处
期刊:Journal of American College Health [Informa]
卷期号:39 (5): 219-225 被引量:403
标识
DOI:10.1080/07448481.1991.9936238
摘要

This study proposed to develop and validate a scale for the college population that measures self-efficacy in using condoms. The Condom Use Self-Efficacy Scale (CUSES) was derived from several sources and consisted of 28 items describing an individual's feelings of confidence about being able to purchase condoms, put them on and take them off, and negotiate their use with a new sexual partner. This scale was administered to a sample of 768 college students. It was found to possess adequate reliability (Cronbach's alpha = .91; test-retest correlation = .81) and correlated well with the Attitude Toward the Condom Scale (r = .51) and the Contraceptive Self-Efficacy Scale for women (r = .55). Our scale also correlated with a measure of intention to use condoms (r = .40) but was unrelated to a measure of social desirability. Students who differed on measures of previous condom use as well as on sexual intercourse experience also showed significant differences on this scale in the expected direction, indicating evidence of this scale's discriminant validity. The potential uses of this scale in a college population are discussed, along with the issues underlying condom usage self-efficacy.The methods and validation results of the development of a condom self-efficacy scale (CUSES) for college students is reported. Development of the scale was based on previous literature, an expert panel, and input form 183 college students. 60 items were included in the initial questionnaire and 15 factors were identified as influencing college students; self-efficacy toward condom usage. 28 specific self-efficacy items were then created with a scale ranging from strongly agree to disagree. The 15 factors were 1) personal experience with condoms, 2) embarrassment at purchase, 3) alcohol use, 4) not wanting to offend with the implication of uncleanliness, 5) reduction in excitement, 6) loss of spontaneity, 7) breaking the mood, 8) not being prepared, 9) unsure of partner's feeling about condoms, 10) embarrassment, 11) communication with partner, 12) embarrassment about talking about condoms, 13) afraid of partner's refusal of condom use, 14) ability to maintain an erection, and 15) fear of reputation. The entire survey tested had 124 questions: the 28-item new scale, Brown's Attitude Toward Condom Use (ATC) scale, Levinson's Contraceptive Self Efficacy Scale for women (CSE), a short form of the Marlow-Crowne Social Desirability scale, and 3 outcome measures. Changes were made after 60 students pretested the questionnaire for readability, understanding, and anonymity. Validity scale measures are reported for the other scales used. 803 students were administered the questionnaire during class, but not sex education classes, and 2 weeks later. The demographics are given and were similar to the pretest. The mean score of CUSES was 75.69 )SD=15.50). Cronbach's alpha with 768 cases was .91 and after 2 weeks .81 and are comparable to other reliability coefficients. CUSES correlated significantly with the ATC scale (r=.51, p.001) and the CSE (r=.55, p.001) with evidence of convergent validity. It was significantly correlated with behavioral intentions (r=.40, p.001) and outcome efficacy score of condom users was M=81.31, n=260, and nonusers was M=74.91, n=407, and users mean was significantly greater. Those who had used a condom had significantly higher CUSES scores than those who had not, and those who had a prior sexually transmitted disease (STD) approached a significant difference. There was no significant difference between men and women. A limitation is that the sample was not random, and the measures of behavioral intention and past behavior are self-reports. Although behavioral intention is the best predictor of future behavior, it may not be an accurate measure. The sample was not ethnically or sexually diverse. The confidence with which students felt about some items is discussed and it may be helpful to educators to focus on condom purchase, negotiating condom use with a new partner, and homosexuality and STDs.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
RATHER完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
乐观的雁易完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
FashionBoy应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
18秒前
yufan发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
SH123完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
susu完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
wb完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
24秒前
Ray完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
像我这样抽象的人完成签到 ,获得积分10
35秒前
大水完成签到 ,获得积分10
35秒前
丰富的大地完成签到,获得积分10
37秒前
47秒前
苏su完成签到 ,获得积分10
49秒前
程程发布了新的文献求助10
51秒前
健忘的晓小完成签到 ,获得积分10
56秒前
拉长的诗蕊完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
lshao完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
习月阳完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
spinon完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
王佳豪完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
yufan完成签到,获得积分20
1分钟前
哥哥发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
Ruuo616完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
回首不再是少年完成签到,获得积分0
1分钟前
陶世立完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
草莓熊1215完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
我和你完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
wyh295352318完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
bookgg完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
XZZ完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
丘比特应助丹尼尔采纳,获得10
2分钟前
哥哥发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
心静自然好完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
夜渡河关注了科研通微信公众号
2分钟前
2分钟前
cherry_mm发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
FashionBoy应助哥哥采纳,获得10
2分钟前
缘分完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
胤嘉完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Mechanistic Modeling of Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flow in Pipes 2500
Structural Load Modelling and Combination for Performance and Safety Evaluation 800
Conference Record, IAS Annual Meeting 1977 610
Interest Rate Modeling. Volume 3: Products and Risk Management 600
Interest Rate Modeling. Volume 2: Term Structure Models 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3555826
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3131443
关于积分的说明 9391104
捐赠科研通 2831132
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1556396
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 726516
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 715890