Development and Validation of a Condom Self-Efficacy Scale for College Students

避孕套 克朗巴赫阿尔法 比例(比率) 心理学 自我效能感 人口 性交 临床心理学 判别效度 社会心理学 心理测量学 医学 家庭医学 环境卫生 物理 人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV) 内部一致性 梅毒 量子力学
作者
Linda J. Brafford,Kenneth H. Beck
出处
期刊:Journal of American College Health [Taylor & Francis]
卷期号:39 (5): 219-225 被引量:403
标识
DOI:10.1080/07448481.1991.9936238
摘要

This study proposed to develop and validate a scale for the college population that measures self-efficacy in using condoms. The Condom Use Self-Efficacy Scale (CUSES) was derived from several sources and consisted of 28 items describing an individual's feelings of confidence about being able to purchase condoms, put them on and take them off, and negotiate their use with a new sexual partner. This scale was administered to a sample of 768 college students. It was found to possess adequate reliability (Cronbach's alpha = .91; test-retest correlation = .81) and correlated well with the Attitude Toward the Condom Scale (r = .51) and the Contraceptive Self-Efficacy Scale for women (r = .55). Our scale also correlated with a measure of intention to use condoms (r = .40) but was unrelated to a measure of social desirability. Students who differed on measures of previous condom use as well as on sexual intercourse experience also showed significant differences on this scale in the expected direction, indicating evidence of this scale's discriminant validity. The potential uses of this scale in a college population are discussed, along with the issues underlying condom usage self-efficacy.The methods and validation results of the development of a condom self-efficacy scale (CUSES) for college students is reported. Development of the scale was based on previous literature, an expert panel, and input form 183 college students. 60 items were included in the initial questionnaire and 15 factors were identified as influencing college students; self-efficacy toward condom usage. 28 specific self-efficacy items were then created with a scale ranging from strongly agree to disagree. The 15 factors were 1) personal experience with condoms, 2) embarrassment at purchase, 3) alcohol use, 4) not wanting to offend with the implication of uncleanliness, 5) reduction in excitement, 6) loss of spontaneity, 7) breaking the mood, 8) not being prepared, 9) unsure of partner's feeling about condoms, 10) embarrassment, 11) communication with partner, 12) embarrassment about talking about condoms, 13) afraid of partner's refusal of condom use, 14) ability to maintain an erection, and 15) fear of reputation. The entire survey tested had 124 questions: the 28-item new scale, Brown's Attitude Toward Condom Use (ATC) scale, Levinson's Contraceptive Self Efficacy Scale for women (CSE), a short form of the Marlow-Crowne Social Desirability scale, and 3 outcome measures. Changes were made after 60 students pretested the questionnaire for readability, understanding, and anonymity. Validity scale measures are reported for the other scales used. 803 students were administered the questionnaire during class, but not sex education classes, and 2 weeks later. The demographics are given and were similar to the pretest. The mean score of CUSES was 75.69 )SD=15.50). Cronbach's alpha with 768 cases was .91 and after 2 weeks .81 and are comparable to other reliability coefficients. CUSES correlated significantly with the ATC scale (r=.51, p.001) and the CSE (r=.55, p.001) with evidence of convergent validity. It was significantly correlated with behavioral intentions (r=.40, p.001) and outcome efficacy score of condom users was M=81.31, n=260, and nonusers was M=74.91, n=407, and users mean was significantly greater. Those who had used a condom had significantly higher CUSES scores than those who had not, and those who had a prior sexually transmitted disease (STD) approached a significant difference. There was no significant difference between men and women. A limitation is that the sample was not random, and the measures of behavioral intention and past behavior are self-reports. Although behavioral intention is the best predictor of future behavior, it may not be an accurate measure. The sample was not ethnically or sexually diverse. The confidence with which students felt about some items is discussed and it may be helpful to educators to focus on condom purchase, negotiating condom use with a new partner, and homosexuality and STDs.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
刚刚
yi完成签到,获得积分20
刚刚
虚心的芹发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
cureall应助小西采纳,获得10
1秒前
伶俐芷珊完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
pluto应助冷静羿采纳,获得10
2秒前
马素娜完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
Narcissus完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
明理平文完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
结实的慕凝完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
王w完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
Billy应助早早干饭采纳,获得30
4秒前
长度2到发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
Q清风慕竹应助莉莉采纳,获得10
4秒前
派大星完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
11完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
Akim应助开心人达采纳,获得10
5秒前
6秒前
123完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
巴黎的防完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
哈哈哈完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
慕青应助伶俐芷珊采纳,获得10
6秒前
耀健完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
GGKing完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
肥鲸鱼完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
852应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
桐桐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
斜玉完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
orixero应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
眼睛大硬币完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
顾矜应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
NexusExplorer应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
乐乐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
李健应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
ding应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
高分求助中
The Mother of All Tableaux Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 2400
Ophthalmic Equipment Market by Devices(surgical: vitreorentinal,IOLs,OVDs,contact lens,RGP lens,backflush,diagnostic&monitoring:OCT,actorefractor,keratometer,tonometer,ophthalmoscpe,OVD), End User,Buying Criteria-Global Forecast to2029 2000
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind (Sixth Edition) 1000
Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL 600
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 588
A Preliminary Study on Correlation Between Independent Components of Facial Thermal Images and Subjective Assessment of Chronic Stress 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3960498
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3506752
关于积分的说明 11131877
捐赠科研通 3238932
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1789917
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 872043
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 803128