亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Development and Validation of a Condom Self-Efficacy Scale for College Students

避孕套 克朗巴赫阿尔法 比例(比率) 心理学 自我效能感 人口 性交 临床心理学 判别效度 社会心理学 心理测量学 医学 家庭医学 环境卫生 物理 人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV) 内部一致性 梅毒 量子力学
作者
Linda J. Brafford,Kenneth H. Beck
出处
期刊:Journal of American College Health [Taylor & Francis]
卷期号:39 (5): 219-225 被引量:403
标识
DOI:10.1080/07448481.1991.9936238
摘要

This study proposed to develop and validate a scale for the college population that measures self-efficacy in using condoms. The Condom Use Self-Efficacy Scale (CUSES) was derived from several sources and consisted of 28 items describing an individual's feelings of confidence about being able to purchase condoms, put them on and take them off, and negotiate their use with a new sexual partner. This scale was administered to a sample of 768 college students. It was found to possess adequate reliability (Cronbach's alpha = .91; test-retest correlation = .81) and correlated well with the Attitude Toward the Condom Scale (r = .51) and the Contraceptive Self-Efficacy Scale for women (r = .55). Our scale also correlated with a measure of intention to use condoms (r = .40) but was unrelated to a measure of social desirability. Students who differed on measures of previous condom use as well as on sexual intercourse experience also showed significant differences on this scale in the expected direction, indicating evidence of this scale's discriminant validity. The potential uses of this scale in a college population are discussed, along with the issues underlying condom usage self-efficacy.The methods and validation results of the development of a condom self-efficacy scale (CUSES) for college students is reported. Development of the scale was based on previous literature, an expert panel, and input form 183 college students. 60 items were included in the initial questionnaire and 15 factors were identified as influencing college students; self-efficacy toward condom usage. 28 specific self-efficacy items were then created with a scale ranging from strongly agree to disagree. The 15 factors were 1) personal experience with condoms, 2) embarrassment at purchase, 3) alcohol use, 4) not wanting to offend with the implication of uncleanliness, 5) reduction in excitement, 6) loss of spontaneity, 7) breaking the mood, 8) not being prepared, 9) unsure of partner's feeling about condoms, 10) embarrassment, 11) communication with partner, 12) embarrassment about talking about condoms, 13) afraid of partner's refusal of condom use, 14) ability to maintain an erection, and 15) fear of reputation. The entire survey tested had 124 questions: the 28-item new scale, Brown's Attitude Toward Condom Use (ATC) scale, Levinson's Contraceptive Self Efficacy Scale for women (CSE), a short form of the Marlow-Crowne Social Desirability scale, and 3 outcome measures. Changes were made after 60 students pretested the questionnaire for readability, understanding, and anonymity. Validity scale measures are reported for the other scales used. 803 students were administered the questionnaire during class, but not sex education classes, and 2 weeks later. The demographics are given and were similar to the pretest. The mean score of CUSES was 75.69 )SD=15.50). Cronbach's alpha with 768 cases was .91 and after 2 weeks .81 and are comparable to other reliability coefficients. CUSES correlated significantly with the ATC scale (r=.51, p.001) and the CSE (r=.55, p.001) with evidence of convergent validity. It was significantly correlated with behavioral intentions (r=.40, p.001) and outcome efficacy score of condom users was M=81.31, n=260, and nonusers was M=74.91, n=407, and users mean was significantly greater. Those who had used a condom had significantly higher CUSES scores than those who had not, and those who had a prior sexually transmitted disease (STD) approached a significant difference. There was no significant difference between men and women. A limitation is that the sample was not random, and the measures of behavioral intention and past behavior are self-reports. Although behavioral intention is the best predictor of future behavior, it may not be an accurate measure. The sample was not ethnically or sexually diverse. The confidence with which students felt about some items is discussed and it may be helpful to educators to focus on condom purchase, negotiating condom use with a new partner, and homosexuality and STDs.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
5秒前
羞涩的傲菡完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助50
11秒前
57秒前
1分钟前
闲逛的木头2完成签到,获得积分20
1分钟前
捉迷藏完成签到,获得积分0
1分钟前
馆长应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
迅速的岩完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
HYQ完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
3分钟前
嘻嘻完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
ding应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
徐凤年完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
沐雨微寒完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
4分钟前
4分钟前
欣慰外套完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
yindi1991完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
5分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
5分钟前
美满的小蘑菇完成签到 ,获得积分10
6分钟前
7分钟前
乐乐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7分钟前
7分钟前
瘦瘦的枫叶完成签到 ,获得积分10
8分钟前
8分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
8分钟前
陀思妥耶夫斯基完成签到 ,获得积分10
8分钟前
张杰列夫完成签到 ,获得积分10
9分钟前
JamesPei应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9分钟前
馆长应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
9分钟前
馆长应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9分钟前
馆长应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9分钟前
花落无声完成签到 ,获得积分10
10分钟前
10分钟前
Lily完成签到,获得积分10
10分钟前
10分钟前
Lily发布了新的文献求助10
10分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
计划经济时代的工厂管理与工人状况(1949-1966)——以郑州市国营工厂为例 500
Comparison of spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia in total hip and total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review 500
INQUIRY-BASED PEDAGOGY TO SUPPORT STEM LEARNING AND 21ST CENTURY SKILLS: PREPARING NEW TEACHERS TO IMPLEMENT PROJECT AND PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING 500
Modern Britain, 1750 to the Present (第2版) 300
Writing to the Rhythm of Labor Cultural Politics of the Chinese Revolution, 1942–1976 300
Lightning Wires: The Telegraph and China's Technological Modernization, 1860-1890 250
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 催化作用 遗传学 冶金 电极 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4596068
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4008190
关于积分的说明 12408923
捐赠科研通 3687090
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2032193
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1065428
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 950759