LEARNERS’ PROCESSING, UPTAKE, AND RETENTION OF CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK ON WRITING

纠正性反馈 会话(web分析) 同行反馈 计算机科学 心理学 多媒体 数学教育 万维网
作者
Neomy Storch,Gillian Wigglesworth
出处
期刊:Studies in Second Language Acquisition [Cambridge University Press]
卷期号:32 (2): 303-334 被引量:333
标识
DOI:10.1017/s0272263109990532
摘要

The literature on corrective feedback (CF) that second language writers receive in response to their grammatical and lexical errors is plagued by controversies and conflicting findings about the merits of feedback. Although more recent studies suggest that CF is valuable (e.g., Bitchener, 2008; Sheen, 2007), it is still not clear whether direct or indirect feedback is the most effective, or why. This study explored the efficacy of two different forms of CF. The investigation focused on the nature of the learners’ engagement with the feedback received to gain a better understanding of why some feedback is taken up and retained and some is not. The study was composed of three sessions. In session 1, learners worked in pairs to compose a text based on a graphic prompt. Feedback was provided either in the form of reformulations (direct feedback) or editing symbols (indirect feedback). In session 2 (day 5), the learners reviewed the feedback they received and rewrote their text. All pair talk was audio-recorded. In session 3 (day 28), each of the learners composed a text individually using the same prompt as in session 1. The texts produced by the pairs after feedback were analyzed for evidence of uptake of the feedback given and texts produced individually in session 3 for evidence of retention. The learners’ transcribed pair talk proved a very rich source of data that showed not only how learners processed the feedback received but also their attitudes toward the feedback and their beliefs about language conventions and use. Closer analysis of four case study pairs suggests that uptake and retention may be affected by a host of linguistic and affective factors, including the type of errors the learners make in their writing and, more importantly, learners’ attitudes, beliefs, and goals. The findings suggest that, although often ignored in research on CF, these affective factors play an important role in uptake and retention of feedback.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
过pass完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
bettyscu发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
llll发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
天流完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
颜靖仇发布了新的文献求助100
3秒前
cbb发布了新的文献求助30
3秒前
卡皮巴拉完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
4秒前
大晴天发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
赵欢欢发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
ugot完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
煜琪发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
enen发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
华仔应助zkxin采纳,获得10
6秒前
wanci应助111采纳,获得30
7秒前
王东旭发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
8秒前
雨幕发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
陈陈完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
Monty发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
刘蒙发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
Sun完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
huangqqk发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
烟花应助he采纳,获得10
12秒前
TAO发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
宋嬴一发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
隐形曼青应助humblelucas采纳,获得10
14秒前
14秒前
HEIGE发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
高分求助中
【提示信息,请勿应助】关于scihub 10000
The Mother of All Tableaux: Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 3000
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
北师大毕业论文 基于可调谐半导体激光吸收光谱技术泄漏气体检测系统的研究 390
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
Robot-supported joining of reinforcement textiles with one-sided sewing heads 360
Atlas of Interventional Pain Management 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4011574
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3551304
关于积分的说明 11308331
捐赠科研通 3285566
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1811101
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 886780
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 811638