LEARNERS’ PROCESSING, UPTAKE, AND RETENTION OF CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK ON WRITING

纠正性反馈 会话(web分析) 同行反馈 计算机科学 心理学 多媒体 数学教育 万维网
作者
Neomy Storch,Gillian Wigglesworth
出处
期刊:Studies in Second Language Acquisition [Cambridge University Press]
卷期号:32 (2): 303-334 被引量:333
标识
DOI:10.1017/s0272263109990532
摘要

The literature on corrective feedback (CF) that second language writers receive in response to their grammatical and lexical errors is plagued by controversies and conflicting findings about the merits of feedback. Although more recent studies suggest that CF is valuable (e.g., Bitchener, 2008; Sheen, 2007), it is still not clear whether direct or indirect feedback is the most effective, or why. This study explored the efficacy of two different forms of CF. The investigation focused on the nature of the learners’ engagement with the feedback received to gain a better understanding of why some feedback is taken up and retained and some is not. The study was composed of three sessions. In session 1, learners worked in pairs to compose a text based on a graphic prompt. Feedback was provided either in the form of reformulations (direct feedback) or editing symbols (indirect feedback). In session 2 (day 5), the learners reviewed the feedback they received and rewrote their text. All pair talk was audio-recorded. In session 3 (day 28), each of the learners composed a text individually using the same prompt as in session 1. The texts produced by the pairs after feedback were analyzed for evidence of uptake of the feedback given and texts produced individually in session 3 for evidence of retention. The learners’ transcribed pair talk proved a very rich source of data that showed not only how learners processed the feedback received but also their attitudes toward the feedback and their beliefs about language conventions and use. Closer analysis of four case study pairs suggests that uptake and retention may be affected by a host of linguistic and affective factors, including the type of errors the learners make in their writing and, more importantly, learners’ attitudes, beliefs, and goals. The findings suggest that, although often ignored in research on CF, these affective factors play an important role in uptake and retention of feedback.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
火星上雁枫完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
April完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
小文殊完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
菠萝吹雪完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
hehe发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
荀煜祺发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
安澜完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
研友_nPxRRn完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
无花果应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
科研韭菜完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
顺心紫南完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
啵妞完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
ClaudiaCY完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
罗氏集团完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
祝你勇敢完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
快乐大炮完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
聪慧的从雪完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
wnll发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
秦磊发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
sscss完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
无脚鸟完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
鑫光熠熠完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
搬砖完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
锂离子完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
科研通AI2S应助huzi采纳,获得10
30秒前
七里香完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
科研通AI2S应助hehe采纳,获得10
32秒前
HHF完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
33秒前
1661321476完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
研友_GZ3zRn完成签到 ,获得积分0
37秒前
37秒前
38秒前
crave发布了新的文献求助10
38秒前
典雅的语海完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
嘟嘟52edm完成签到 ,获得积分10
39秒前
高分求助中
The Mother of All Tableaux: Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 3000
Social Research Methods (4th Edition) by Maggie Walter (2019) 2390
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
北师大毕业论文 基于可调谐半导体激光吸收光谱技术泄漏气体检测系统的研究 390
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
Robot-supported joining of reinforcement textiles with one-sided sewing heads 360
Atlas of Interventional Pain Management 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4008834
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3548485
关于积分的说明 11298899
捐赠科研通 3283114
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1810290
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 886000
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 811220