亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

The Minimal Clinically Important Difference: A Review of Clinical Significance

最小临床重要差异 医学 标准化 临床试验 结果(博弈论) 临床研究设计 医学物理学 随机对照试验 统计 外科 数学 病理 计算机科学 操作系统 数理经济学
作者
David A. Bloom,Daniel J. Kaplan,Edward S. Mojica,Eric J. Strauss,Guillem Gonzalez‐Lomas,Kirk A. Campbell,Michael J. Alaia,Laith M. Jazrawi
出处
期刊:American Journal of Sports Medicine [SAGE]
卷期号:51 (2): 520-524 被引量:91
标识
DOI:10.1177/03635465211053869
摘要

The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is a term synonymous with orthopaedic clinical research over the past decade. The term represents the smallest change in a patient-reported outcome measure that is of genuine clinical value to patients. It has been derived in a myriad of ways in existing orthopaedic literature.To describe the various modalities for deriving the MCID.Narrative review; Level of evidence, 4.The definitions of common MCID determinations were first identified. These were then evaluated by their clinical and statistical merits and limitations.There are 3 primary ways for determining the MCID: anchor-based analysis, distribution-based analysis, and sensitivity- and specificity-based analysis. Each has unique strengths and weaknesses with respect to its ability to evaluate the patient's clinical status change from baseline to posttreatment. Anchor-based analyses are inherently tied to clinical status yet lack standardization. Distribution-based analyses are the opposite, with strong foundations in statistics, yet they fail to adequately address the clinical status change. Sensitivity and specificity analyses offer a compromise of the other methodologies but still rely on a somewhat arbitrarily defined global transition question.This current concepts review demonstrates the need for (1) better standardization in the establishment of MCIDs for orthopaedic patient-reported outcome measures and (2) better study design-namely, until a universally accepted MCID derivation exists, studies attempting to derive the MCID should utilize the anchor-based within-cohort design based on Food and Drug Administration recommendations. Ideally, large studies reporting the MCID as an outcome will also derive the value for their populations. It is important to consider that there may be reasonable replacements for current derivations of the MCID. As such, future research should consider an alternative threshold score with a more universal method of derivation.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
科研通AI6.2应助机智荔枝采纳,获得10
15秒前
58秒前
克泷发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
机智荔枝发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
优雅的花瓣完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
jinchen发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
Kevin完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
2分钟前
lovelife完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
automan完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
落伍少年发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
automan发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
机智荔枝完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
语言与言语完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
华仔应助Omni采纳,获得10
2分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
专注之槐完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
专注之槐发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
缥缈纲完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
善学以致用应助番茄大王采纳,获得10
4分钟前
19900420完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
4分钟前
4分钟前
4分钟前
共享精神应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4分钟前
番茄大王发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
4分钟前
xiaofan1991发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 5000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Propeller Design 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 纳米技术 化学工程 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 冶金 细胞生物学 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6012704
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7572611
关于积分的说明 16139311
捐赠科研通 5159757
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2763175
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1742564
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1634090