The Minimal Clinically Important Difference: A Review of Clinical Significance

最小临床重要差异 医学 标准化 临床试验 结果(博弈论) 临床研究设计 医学物理学 随机对照试验 统计 外科 数学 病理 计算机科学 操作系统 数理经济学
作者
David A. Bloom,Daniel J. Kaplan,Edward S. Mojica,Eric J. Strauss,Guillem Gonzalez‐Lomas,Kirk A. Campbell,Michael J. Alaia,Laith M. Jazrawi
出处
期刊:American Journal of Sports Medicine [SAGE]
卷期号:51 (2): 520-524 被引量:91
标识
DOI:10.1177/03635465211053869
摘要

The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is a term synonymous with orthopaedic clinical research over the past decade. The term represents the smallest change in a patient-reported outcome measure that is of genuine clinical value to patients. It has been derived in a myriad of ways in existing orthopaedic literature.To describe the various modalities for deriving the MCID.Narrative review; Level of evidence, 4.The definitions of common MCID determinations were first identified. These were then evaluated by their clinical and statistical merits and limitations.There are 3 primary ways for determining the MCID: anchor-based analysis, distribution-based analysis, and sensitivity- and specificity-based analysis. Each has unique strengths and weaknesses with respect to its ability to evaluate the patient's clinical status change from baseline to posttreatment. Anchor-based analyses are inherently tied to clinical status yet lack standardization. Distribution-based analyses are the opposite, with strong foundations in statistics, yet they fail to adequately address the clinical status change. Sensitivity and specificity analyses offer a compromise of the other methodologies but still rely on a somewhat arbitrarily defined global transition question.This current concepts review demonstrates the need for (1) better standardization in the establishment of MCIDs for orthopaedic patient-reported outcome measures and (2) better study design-namely, until a universally accepted MCID derivation exists, studies attempting to derive the MCID should utilize the anchor-based within-cohort design based on Food and Drug Administration recommendations. Ideally, large studies reporting the MCID as an outcome will also derive the value for their populations. It is important to consider that there may be reasonable replacements for current derivations of the MCID. As such, future research should consider an alternative threshold score with a more universal method of derivation.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
独特的凡蕾完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
孤独的明雪完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
默默善愁完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
花花发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
年年年年发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
一支菜馅儿馄饨完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
垃圾智造者完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
酷波er应助张张采纳,获得10
12秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助30
12秒前
Tang完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
老实幻姬发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
zxxxx发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
叽里呱啦完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
yyjdtc完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
蓝华完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
yrj完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
聪慧咖啡豆完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
Leticia发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
情怀应助香蕉半邪采纳,获得10
17秒前
微风完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
Lee发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
19秒前
19秒前
19秒前
多吃青菜完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
PhDLi完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
20秒前
21秒前
22秒前
22秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 2000
The Cambridge History of China: Volume 4, Sui and T'ang China, 589–906 AD, Part Two 1000
The Composition and Relative Chronology of Dynasties 16 and 17 in Egypt 1000
Russian Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity 800
Real World Research, 5th Edition 800
Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo By Jenine Beekhuyzen, Pat Bazeley · 2024 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5717929
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5249249
关于积分的说明 15283791
捐赠科研通 4867991
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2614002
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1563914
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1521377