The Minimal Clinically Important Difference: A Review of Clinical Significance

最小临床重要差异 医学 标准化 临床试验 结果(博弈论) 临床研究设计 医学物理学 随机对照试验 统计 外科 数学 病理 计算机科学 操作系统 数理经济学
作者
David A. Bloom,Daniel J. Kaplan,Edward S. Mojica,Eric J. Strauss,Guillem Gonzalez‐Lomas,Kirk A. Campbell,Michael J. Alaia,Laith M. Jazrawi
出处
期刊:American Journal of Sports Medicine [SAGE]
卷期号:51 (2): 520-524 被引量:91
标识
DOI:10.1177/03635465211053869
摘要

The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is a term synonymous with orthopaedic clinical research over the past decade. The term represents the smallest change in a patient-reported outcome measure that is of genuine clinical value to patients. It has been derived in a myriad of ways in existing orthopaedic literature.To describe the various modalities for deriving the MCID.Narrative review; Level of evidence, 4.The definitions of common MCID determinations were first identified. These were then evaluated by their clinical and statistical merits and limitations.There are 3 primary ways for determining the MCID: anchor-based analysis, distribution-based analysis, and sensitivity- and specificity-based analysis. Each has unique strengths and weaknesses with respect to its ability to evaluate the patient's clinical status change from baseline to posttreatment. Anchor-based analyses are inherently tied to clinical status yet lack standardization. Distribution-based analyses are the opposite, with strong foundations in statistics, yet they fail to adequately address the clinical status change. Sensitivity and specificity analyses offer a compromise of the other methodologies but still rely on a somewhat arbitrarily defined global transition question.This current concepts review demonstrates the need for (1) better standardization in the establishment of MCIDs for orthopaedic patient-reported outcome measures and (2) better study design-namely, until a universally accepted MCID derivation exists, studies attempting to derive the MCID should utilize the anchor-based within-cohort design based on Food and Drug Administration recommendations. Ideally, large studies reporting the MCID as an outcome will also derive the value for their populations. It is important to consider that there may be reasonable replacements for current derivations of the MCID. As such, future research should consider an alternative threshold score with a more universal method of derivation.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
1秒前
神勇大开完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
Mzb发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
lemio关注了科研通微信公众号
1秒前
ren发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
无情魂幽发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
MeetAgainLZH发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
ablexm完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
科研通AI6.1应助ZZZ采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
xiaoE完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
JamesPei应助美丽人生采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
小吴发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
吃人陈发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
陈责完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
丘比特应助李李的信采纳,获得10
6秒前
田様应助学术感人采纳,获得10
6秒前
CodeCraft应助wan采纳,获得10
6秒前
二十完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
wencyleung完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
脆脆鲨发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
DH完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
大河_农经完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
郝磊完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
苦学僧发布了新的文献求助20
9秒前
流浪的鲨鱼完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
fourier发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
小小完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
123发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 3000
Les Mantodea de guyane 2500
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 2000
What is the Future of Psychotherapy in a Digital Age? 700
The Psychological Quest for Meaning 600
Zeolites: From Fundamentals to Emerging Applications 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5954917
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7164417
关于积分的说明 15936615
捐赠科研通 5089847
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2735432
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1696283
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1617249