The Minimal Clinically Important Difference: A Review of Clinical Significance

最小临床重要差异 医学 标准化 临床试验 结果(博弈论) 临床研究设计 医学物理学 随机对照试验 统计 外科 数学 病理 计算机科学 操作系统 数理经济学
作者
David A. Bloom,Daniel J. Kaplan,Edward S. Mojica,Eric J. Strauss,Guillem Gonzalez‐Lomas,Kirk A. Campbell,Michael J. Alaia,Laith M. Jazrawi
出处
期刊:American Journal of Sports Medicine [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:51 (2): 520-524 被引量:91
标识
DOI:10.1177/03635465211053869
摘要

The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is a term synonymous with orthopaedic clinical research over the past decade. The term represents the smallest change in a patient-reported outcome measure that is of genuine clinical value to patients. It has been derived in a myriad of ways in existing orthopaedic literature.To describe the various modalities for deriving the MCID.Narrative review; Level of evidence, 4.The definitions of common MCID determinations were first identified. These were then evaluated by their clinical and statistical merits and limitations.There are 3 primary ways for determining the MCID: anchor-based analysis, distribution-based analysis, and sensitivity- and specificity-based analysis. Each has unique strengths and weaknesses with respect to its ability to evaluate the patient's clinical status change from baseline to posttreatment. Anchor-based analyses are inherently tied to clinical status yet lack standardization. Distribution-based analyses are the opposite, with strong foundations in statistics, yet they fail to adequately address the clinical status change. Sensitivity and specificity analyses offer a compromise of the other methodologies but still rely on a somewhat arbitrarily defined global transition question.This current concepts review demonstrates the need for (1) better standardization in the establishment of MCIDs for orthopaedic patient-reported outcome measures and (2) better study design-namely, until a universally accepted MCID derivation exists, studies attempting to derive the MCID should utilize the anchor-based within-cohort design based on Food and Drug Administration recommendations. Ideally, large studies reporting the MCID as an outcome will also derive the value for their populations. It is important to consider that there may be reasonable replacements for current derivations of the MCID. As such, future research should consider an alternative threshold score with a more universal method of derivation.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
刚刚
jinbozhang发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
喜羊羊发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
丘比特应助不霉采纳,获得10
1秒前
gayongpeng发布了新的文献求助30
1秒前
SciGPT应助缥缈的之瑶采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
Xhan发布了新的文献求助50
2秒前
天亦完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
乐观秋天完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
bluer发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
AlexanderChen发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
陈涛完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
刻苦黎云发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
思源应助天师混迹江湖采纳,获得10
3秒前
李李玲发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
Wangnono完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
HHH发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
不爱巧克力完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
穆清应助言敬采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
CodeCraft应助诚心的从云采纳,获得10
5秒前
IMDSB发布了新的文献求助30
7秒前
脑洞疼应助疯狂反光板采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
mashuai发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
科研通AI6.4应助n5421采纳,获得10
8秒前
cjl发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
BaBa完成签到,获得积分20
12秒前
13秒前
琦琦完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Lewis’s Child and Adolescent Psychiatry: A Comprehensive Textbook Sixth Edition 2000
Cronologia da história de Macau 1600
Continuing Syntax 1000
Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science Reference Work • Third edition • 2025 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 510
Pharma R&D Annual Review 2026 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6214463
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8039953
关于积分的说明 16755030
捐赠科研通 5302723
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2825123
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1803533
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1663987