Association of Pharmacological Interventions With Symptom Burden Reduction in Patients With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

医学 脑震荡 创伤性脑损伤 干预(咨询) 毒物控制 伤害预防 脑震荡后综合征 心理干预 斯科普斯 物理疗法 重症监护医学 梅德林 精神科 急诊医学 政治学 法学
作者
Charles Lee Feinberg,Catherine Carr,Roger Zemek,Keith Owen Yeates,Christina L. Master,Kathryn Schneider,Michael J. Bell,Stephen R. Wisniewski,Rebekah Mannix
出处
期刊:JAMA Neurology [American Medical Association]
卷期号:78 (5): 596-596 被引量:16
标识
DOI:10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.5079
摘要

Importance

Mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) is experienced by 55.9 million people globally each year. The symptoms of mild TBI are diverse and sometimes long-lasting, requiring frequent use of pharmacological interventions to mitigate them. A thorough understanding of the data supporting pharmacological interventions is important for decision-making among clinicians treating this common injury.

Objective

To systematically review studies of pharmacological interventions and their associations with symptom burden reduction among patients with mild TBI and to use an evidence-based model to identify potential directions for future research that may aid in clinical decision-making.

Evidence Review

A systematic review was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Search strings modified for the advanced search interfaces of each search engine were developed in consultation with a librarian and included combinations of search terms, such asbrain concussion,post-concussion syndrome,mild traumatic brain injury, andpharmacological treatment. Articles published between January 1, 2000, and July 1, 2020, were analyzed. Studies were included if (1) they were clinical studies with discrete analyses of participants with mild TBI or complicated mild TBI, (2) they were assessments of a pharmacological intervention, (3) they included human participants, and (4) they were published in a peer-reviewed journal in the English language. Studies were excluded if the severity of TBI among participants could not be ascertained (ie, inadequate definition of mild TBI) and the inclusion criteria for the study required intracranial hemorrhage. A total of 23 studies examining 20 pharmacological interventions met the inclusion criteria. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias for Randomized Trials (for randomized clinical trials) and the Cochrane Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (for all other studies). Data were analyzed from June to September 2020.

Findings

A total of 1495 articles were identified; of those, 131 articles were excluded as duplicates. Titles and abstracts were screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria among the remaining 1364 articles, and 134 of those articles received a full-text review. After exclusions, 23 studies (11 randomized clinical trials, 7 prospective observational studies, 3 retrospective observational studies, and 2 case studies) examining 20 pharmacological interventions were identified for inclusion in the systematic review. Studies included 22 distinct participant populations comprising 8277 participants with mild TBI and 45 participants without TBI. Among 23 total studies, 8 studies specifically addressed the pediatric population, 9 studies had a low risk of bias, and 16 studies reported symptom burden reduction. Of the 20 pharmacological interventions examined in the studies, methylphenidate, sertraline hydrochloride, ondansetron, amitriptyline, and melatonin were the only medications included in multiple studies.

Conclusions and Relevance

This systematic review found a limited number of high-quality, clinically meaningful studies, particularly among children and individuals in the acute stage of injury; therefore, performing an evidence-based analysis that would inform clinical decision-making was not possible. Future studies are needed to focus on standardizing measures and increasing sample sizes (including large multicenter clinical trials) to generate a body of research that may provide additional options for the treatment of patients with mild TBI.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
调皮的君浩关注了科研通微信公众号
1秒前
丰富山柏发布了新的文献求助20
1秒前
zhui发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
代纤绮发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
liu完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
鹊起惊梦发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
科研通AI6应助徐昊雯采纳,获得10
4秒前
深呼吸发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
拼搏的梦槐完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
snnnn完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
6秒前
汝桢发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
SciGPT应助PAN采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
pqq完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
guanxun完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
烟火年年锦完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
7秒前
lumickey发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
爱学习的猫完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
大个应助冷茗采纳,获得10
8秒前
调皮初蓝完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
打打应助gwh采纳,获得10
8秒前
科研通AI5应助zmm采纳,获得10
8秒前
超级绫完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
FangyingTang完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
文章快快来完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
Sherwin完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
李健应助尊敬吐司采纳,获得10
10秒前
snnnn发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
大模型应助Itsccy采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
付大威完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
高分求助中
计划经济时代的工厂管理与工人状况(1949-1966)——以郑州市国营工厂为例 500
INQUIRY-BASED PEDAGOGY TO SUPPORT STEM LEARNING AND 21ST CENTURY SKILLS: PREPARING NEW TEACHERS TO IMPLEMENT PROJECT AND PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING 500
The Pedagogical Leadership in the Early Years (PLEY) Quality Rating Scale 410
Why America Can't Retrench (And How it Might) 400
Stackable Smart Footwear Rack Using Infrared Sensor 300
Modern Britain, 1750 to the Present (第2版) 300
Writing to the Rhythm of Labor Cultural Politics of the Chinese Revolution, 1942–1976 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 催化作用 遗传学 冶金 电极 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4603996
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4012488
关于积分的说明 12423933
捐赠科研通 3693069
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2036050
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1069178
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 953646