Association of Pharmacological Interventions With Symptom Burden Reduction in Patients With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

医学 脑震荡 创伤性脑损伤 干预(咨询) 毒物控制 伤害预防 脑震荡后综合征 心理干预 斯科普斯 物理疗法 重症监护医学 梅德林 精神科 急诊医学 政治学 法学
作者
Charles Lee Feinberg,Catherine Carr,Roger Zemek,Keith Owen Yeates,Christina L. Master,Kathryn Schneider,Michael J. Bell,Stephen R. Wisniewski,Rebekah Mannix
出处
期刊:JAMA Neurology [American Medical Association]
卷期号:78 (5): 596-596 被引量:16
标识
DOI:10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.5079
摘要

Importance

Mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) is experienced by 55.9 million people globally each year. The symptoms of mild TBI are diverse and sometimes long-lasting, requiring frequent use of pharmacological interventions to mitigate them. A thorough understanding of the data supporting pharmacological interventions is important for decision-making among clinicians treating this common injury.

Objective

To systematically review studies of pharmacological interventions and their associations with symptom burden reduction among patients with mild TBI and to use an evidence-based model to identify potential directions for future research that may aid in clinical decision-making.

Evidence Review

A systematic review was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Search strings modified for the advanced search interfaces of each search engine were developed in consultation with a librarian and included combinations of search terms, such asbrain concussion,post-concussion syndrome,mild traumatic brain injury, andpharmacological treatment. Articles published between January 1, 2000, and July 1, 2020, were analyzed. Studies were included if (1) they were clinical studies with discrete analyses of participants with mild TBI or complicated mild TBI, (2) they were assessments of a pharmacological intervention, (3) they included human participants, and (4) they were published in a peer-reviewed journal in the English language. Studies were excluded if the severity of TBI among participants could not be ascertained (ie, inadequate definition of mild TBI) and the inclusion criteria for the study required intracranial hemorrhage. A total of 23 studies examining 20 pharmacological interventions met the inclusion criteria. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias for Randomized Trials (for randomized clinical trials) and the Cochrane Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (for all other studies). Data were analyzed from June to September 2020.

Findings

A total of 1495 articles were identified; of those, 131 articles were excluded as duplicates. Titles and abstracts were screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria among the remaining 1364 articles, and 134 of those articles received a full-text review. After exclusions, 23 studies (11 randomized clinical trials, 7 prospective observational studies, 3 retrospective observational studies, and 2 case studies) examining 20 pharmacological interventions were identified for inclusion in the systematic review. Studies included 22 distinct participant populations comprising 8277 participants with mild TBI and 45 participants without TBI. Among 23 total studies, 8 studies specifically addressed the pediatric population, 9 studies had a low risk of bias, and 16 studies reported symptom burden reduction. Of the 20 pharmacological interventions examined in the studies, methylphenidate, sertraline hydrochloride, ondansetron, amitriptyline, and melatonin were the only medications included in multiple studies.

Conclusions and Relevance

This systematic review found a limited number of high-quality, clinically meaningful studies, particularly among children and individuals in the acute stage of injury; therefore, performing an evidence-based analysis that would inform clinical decision-making was not possible. Future studies are needed to focus on standardizing measures and increasing sample sizes (including large multicenter clinical trials) to generate a body of research that may provide additional options for the treatment of patients with mild TBI.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
李爱国应助孙瑞采纳,获得10
刚刚
wwh完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
Owen应助拼搏小兔子采纳,获得10
刚刚
stuffmatter发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
于金正发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
皮飞111完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
scscsd完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
yyy发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
李健应助暴躁的书蕾采纳,获得10
3秒前
zheei应助暴躁的书蕾采纳,获得10
3秒前
深情安青应助暴躁的书蕾采纳,获得10
4秒前
Jasper应助暴躁的书蕾采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
汉堡包应助暴躁的书蕾采纳,获得10
4秒前
小马甲应助暴躁的书蕾采纳,获得10
4秒前
英俊的铭应助暴躁的书蕾采纳,获得10
4秒前
传奇3应助暴躁的书蕾采纳,获得10
4秒前
Hello应助暴躁的书蕾采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
您吃了吗完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
Raine完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
江安柏完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
负责红酒发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
婉约完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
caiiiiii发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
25778完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
yahonyoyoyo发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
可靠板栗完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
1206425219密发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Aerospace Standards Index - 2026 ASIN2026 3000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 610
Principles of town planning : translating concepts to applications 500
Modified letrozole versus GnRH antagonist protocols in ovarian aging women for IVF: An Open-Label, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial 360
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6062085
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7894344
关于积分的说明 16309240
捐赠科研通 5205686
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2784947
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1767513
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1647410