Association of Pharmacological Interventions With Symptom Burden Reduction in Patients With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

医学 脑震荡 创伤性脑损伤 干预(咨询) 毒物控制 伤害预防 脑震荡后综合征 心理干预 斯科普斯 物理疗法 重症监护医学 梅德林 精神科 急诊医学 政治学 法学
作者
Charles Lee Feinberg,Catherine Carr,Roger Zemek,Keith Owen Yeates,Christina L. Master,Kathryn Schneider,Michael J. Bell,Stephen R. Wisniewski,Rebekah Mannix
出处
期刊:JAMA Neurology [American Medical Association]
卷期号:78 (5): 596-596 被引量:12
标识
DOI:10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.5079
摘要

Importance

Mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) is experienced by 55.9 million people globally each year. The symptoms of mild TBI are diverse and sometimes long-lasting, requiring frequent use of pharmacological interventions to mitigate them. A thorough understanding of the data supporting pharmacological interventions is important for decision-making among clinicians treating this common injury.

Objective

To systematically review studies of pharmacological interventions and their associations with symptom burden reduction among patients with mild TBI and to use an evidence-based model to identify potential directions for future research that may aid in clinical decision-making.

Evidence Review

A systematic review was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Search strings modified for the advanced search interfaces of each search engine were developed in consultation with a librarian and included combinations of search terms, such asbrain concussion,post-concussion syndrome,mild traumatic brain injury, andpharmacological treatment. Articles published between January 1, 2000, and July 1, 2020, were analyzed. Studies were included if (1) they were clinical studies with discrete analyses of participants with mild TBI or complicated mild TBI, (2) they were assessments of a pharmacological intervention, (3) they included human participants, and (4) they were published in a peer-reviewed journal in the English language. Studies were excluded if the severity of TBI among participants could not be ascertained (ie, inadequate definition of mild TBI) and the inclusion criteria for the study required intracranial hemorrhage. A total of 23 studies examining 20 pharmacological interventions met the inclusion criteria. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias for Randomized Trials (for randomized clinical trials) and the Cochrane Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (for all other studies). Data were analyzed from June to September 2020.

Findings

A total of 1495 articles were identified; of those, 131 articles were excluded as duplicates. Titles and abstracts were screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria among the remaining 1364 articles, and 134 of those articles received a full-text review. After exclusions, 23 studies (11 randomized clinical trials, 7 prospective observational studies, 3 retrospective observational studies, and 2 case studies) examining 20 pharmacological interventions were identified for inclusion in the systematic review. Studies included 22 distinct participant populations comprising 8277 participants with mild TBI and 45 participants without TBI. Among 23 total studies, 8 studies specifically addressed the pediatric population, 9 studies had a low risk of bias, and 16 studies reported symptom burden reduction. Of the 20 pharmacological interventions examined in the studies, methylphenidate, sertraline hydrochloride, ondansetron, amitriptyline, and melatonin were the only medications included in multiple studies.

Conclusions and Relevance

This systematic review found a limited number of high-quality, clinically meaningful studies, particularly among children and individuals in the acute stage of injury; therefore, performing an evidence-based analysis that would inform clinical decision-making was not possible. Future studies are needed to focus on standardizing measures and increasing sample sizes (including large multicenter clinical trials) to generate a body of research that may provide additional options for the treatment of patients with mild TBI.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
gqb完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
Raisin完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
leclerc完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
笨笨青筠完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
缥缈可乐完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
sougardenist完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
zhuxd完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
酷波er应助独特棒棒糖采纳,获得10
7秒前
DaSheng完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
9秒前
蓝天黄土完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
执意完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
刘晓伟完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
独特棒棒糖完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
火焰向上发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
yangy115完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
黑黑黑完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
淡定草丛完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
ren发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
犹豫小海豚完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
seven完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
小蘑菇应助欧欧欧导采纳,获得10
19秒前
lyj完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
火焰向上完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
席江海完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
李健应助dldldl采纳,获得10
23秒前
淡然水绿完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
24秒前
蜂蜜不是糖完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
27秒前
贾舒涵完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
光亮夏兰完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
Sea完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
冰子完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
欧欧欧导发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
chemhub完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
Ling完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
Ardilla完成签到 ,获得积分10
35秒前
biolong545完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
高分求助中
Licensing Deals in Pharmaceuticals 2019-2024 3000
Effect of reactor temperature on FCC yield 2000
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 1020
PraxisRatgeber: Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger 800
Mission to Mao: Us Intelligence and the Chinese Communists in World War II 600
The Conscience of the Party: Hu Yaobang, China’s Communist Reformer 600
Geochemistry, 2nd Edition 地球化学经典教科书第二版,不要epub版本 431
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3298809
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2933818
关于积分的说明 8465000
捐赠科研通 2607017
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1423551
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 661594
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 645206