亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Association of Pharmacological Interventions With Symptom Burden Reduction in Patients With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

医学 脑震荡 创伤性脑损伤 干预(咨询) 毒物控制 伤害预防 脑震荡后综合征 心理干预 斯科普斯 物理疗法 重症监护医学 梅德林 精神科 急诊医学 政治学 法学
作者
Charles Lee Feinberg,Catherine Carr,Roger Zemek,Keith Owen Yeates,Christina L. Master,Kathryn Schneider,Michael J. Bell,Stephen R. Wisniewski,Rebekah Mannix
出处
期刊:JAMA Neurology [American Medical Association]
卷期号:78 (5): 596-596 被引量:16
标识
DOI:10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.5079
摘要

Importance

Mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) is experienced by 55.9 million people globally each year. The symptoms of mild TBI are diverse and sometimes long-lasting, requiring frequent use of pharmacological interventions to mitigate them. A thorough understanding of the data supporting pharmacological interventions is important for decision-making among clinicians treating this common injury.

Objective

To systematically review studies of pharmacological interventions and their associations with symptom burden reduction among patients with mild TBI and to use an evidence-based model to identify potential directions for future research that may aid in clinical decision-making.

Evidence Review

A systematic review was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Search strings modified for the advanced search interfaces of each search engine were developed in consultation with a librarian and included combinations of search terms, such asbrain concussion,post-concussion syndrome,mild traumatic brain injury, andpharmacological treatment. Articles published between January 1, 2000, and July 1, 2020, were analyzed. Studies were included if (1) they were clinical studies with discrete analyses of participants with mild TBI or complicated mild TBI, (2) they were assessments of a pharmacological intervention, (3) they included human participants, and (4) they were published in a peer-reviewed journal in the English language. Studies were excluded if the severity of TBI among participants could not be ascertained (ie, inadequate definition of mild TBI) and the inclusion criteria for the study required intracranial hemorrhage. A total of 23 studies examining 20 pharmacological interventions met the inclusion criteria. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias for Randomized Trials (for randomized clinical trials) and the Cochrane Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (for all other studies). Data were analyzed from June to September 2020.

Findings

A total of 1495 articles were identified; of those, 131 articles were excluded as duplicates. Titles and abstracts were screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria among the remaining 1364 articles, and 134 of those articles received a full-text review. After exclusions, 23 studies (11 randomized clinical trials, 7 prospective observational studies, 3 retrospective observational studies, and 2 case studies) examining 20 pharmacological interventions were identified for inclusion in the systematic review. Studies included 22 distinct participant populations comprising 8277 participants with mild TBI and 45 participants without TBI. Among 23 total studies, 8 studies specifically addressed the pediatric population, 9 studies had a low risk of bias, and 16 studies reported symptom burden reduction. Of the 20 pharmacological interventions examined in the studies, methylphenidate, sertraline hydrochloride, ondansetron, amitriptyline, and melatonin were the only medications included in multiple studies.

Conclusions and Relevance

This systematic review found a limited number of high-quality, clinically meaningful studies, particularly among children and individuals in the acute stage of injury; therefore, performing an evidence-based analysis that would inform clinical decision-making was not possible. Future studies are needed to focus on standardizing measures and increasing sample sizes (including large multicenter clinical trials) to generate a body of research that may provide additional options for the treatment of patients with mild TBI.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
2秒前
无花果应助congfeng采纳,获得10
18秒前
suliuyin应助眯眯眼的山柳采纳,获得10
20秒前
852应助眯眯眼的山柳采纳,获得10
20秒前
FashionBoy应助thl采纳,获得10
47秒前
54秒前
英姑应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
57秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
57秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
59秒前
科研通AI2S应助另一种蓝色采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
thl发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
CRUSADER完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
attention完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
cat发布了新的文献求助30
2分钟前
2分钟前
congfeng发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
congfeng完成签到,获得积分20
2分钟前
2分钟前
李健的小迷弟应助thl采纳,获得10
2分钟前
KUIWU完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
Ih6uaZ完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
kki发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
2分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
kki完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
Marshall发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
thl发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
cijing完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
高分求助中
2025-2031全球及中国金刚石触媒粉行业研究及十五五规划分析报告 40000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Introduction to strong mixing conditions volume 1-3 5000
Agyptische Geschichte der 21.30. Dynastie 3000
Les Mantodea de guyane 2000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 2000
„Semitische Wissenschaften“? 1510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5746947
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5440669
关于积分的说明 15356055
捐赠科研通 4886962
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2627493
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1575951
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1532742