Association of Pharmacological Interventions With Symptom Burden Reduction in Patients With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

医学 脑震荡 创伤性脑损伤 干预(咨询) 毒物控制 伤害预防 脑震荡后综合征 心理干预 斯科普斯 物理疗法 重症监护医学 梅德林 精神科 急诊医学 政治学 法学
作者
Charles Lee Feinberg,Catherine Carr,Roger Zemek,Keith Owen Yeates,Christina L. Master,Kathryn Schneider,Michael J. Bell,Stephen R. Wisniewski,Rebekah Mannix
出处
期刊:JAMA Neurology [American Medical Association]
卷期号:78 (5): 596-596 被引量:16
标识
DOI:10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.5079
摘要

Importance

Mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) is experienced by 55.9 million people globally each year. The symptoms of mild TBI are diverse and sometimes long-lasting, requiring frequent use of pharmacological interventions to mitigate them. A thorough understanding of the data supporting pharmacological interventions is important for decision-making among clinicians treating this common injury.

Objective

To systematically review studies of pharmacological interventions and their associations with symptom burden reduction among patients with mild TBI and to use an evidence-based model to identify potential directions for future research that may aid in clinical decision-making.

Evidence Review

A systematic review was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Search strings modified for the advanced search interfaces of each search engine were developed in consultation with a librarian and included combinations of search terms, such asbrain concussion,post-concussion syndrome,mild traumatic brain injury, andpharmacological treatment. Articles published between January 1, 2000, and July 1, 2020, were analyzed. Studies were included if (1) they were clinical studies with discrete analyses of participants with mild TBI or complicated mild TBI, (2) they were assessments of a pharmacological intervention, (3) they included human participants, and (4) they were published in a peer-reviewed journal in the English language. Studies were excluded if the severity of TBI among participants could not be ascertained (ie, inadequate definition of mild TBI) and the inclusion criteria for the study required intracranial hemorrhage. A total of 23 studies examining 20 pharmacological interventions met the inclusion criteria. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias for Randomized Trials (for randomized clinical trials) and the Cochrane Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (for all other studies). Data were analyzed from June to September 2020.

Findings

A total of 1495 articles were identified; of those, 131 articles were excluded as duplicates. Titles and abstracts were screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria among the remaining 1364 articles, and 134 of those articles received a full-text review. After exclusions, 23 studies (11 randomized clinical trials, 7 prospective observational studies, 3 retrospective observational studies, and 2 case studies) examining 20 pharmacological interventions were identified for inclusion in the systematic review. Studies included 22 distinct participant populations comprising 8277 participants with mild TBI and 45 participants without TBI. Among 23 total studies, 8 studies specifically addressed the pediatric population, 9 studies had a low risk of bias, and 16 studies reported symptom burden reduction. Of the 20 pharmacological interventions examined in the studies, methylphenidate, sertraline hydrochloride, ondansetron, amitriptyline, and melatonin were the only medications included in multiple studies.

Conclusions and Relevance

This systematic review found a limited number of high-quality, clinically meaningful studies, particularly among children and individuals in the acute stage of injury; therefore, performing an evidence-based analysis that would inform clinical decision-making was not possible. Future studies are needed to focus on standardizing measures and increasing sample sizes (including large multicenter clinical trials) to generate a body of research that may provide additional options for the treatment of patients with mild TBI.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
隐形的烧鹅完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
多啦啦完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
等待祥完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
丘比特应助简单的大哥采纳,获得30
2秒前
aji发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
5秒前
多多完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
博博完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
充电宝应助傲娇颖采纳,获得10
6秒前
Lucas应助怨念深重采纳,获得10
6秒前
虾仁发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
cc发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
和谐晓啸发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
D33sama发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
FashionBoy应助轻松的小白菜采纳,获得10
8秒前
古月发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
白昼画家完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
MZCCaiajie完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
三问白完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
挖掘机完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
科研通AI2S应助111采纳,获得10
11秒前
Star1983发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
完美世界应助王梦龙采纳,获得10
11秒前
内向初兰完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
小巧大山完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
土豆完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
我是老大应助虾仁采纳,获得10
14秒前
lhz发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
CC完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
WIK发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
知性的千秋完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
爆米花应助古月采纳,获得10
16秒前
VAE发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
高分求助中
The Mother of All Tableaux Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 2400
Ophthalmic Equipment Market by Devices(surgical: vitreorentinal,IOLs,OVDs,contact lens,RGP lens,backflush,diagnostic&monitoring:OCT,actorefractor,keratometer,tonometer,ophthalmoscpe,OVD), End User,Buying Criteria-Global Forecast to2029 2000
Optimal Transport: A Comprehensive Introduction to Modeling, Analysis, Simulation, Applications 800
Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL 600
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 588
Treatise on Geochemistry 500
T/CIET 1202-2025 可吸收再生氧化纤维素止血材料 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3954947
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3501168
关于积分的说明 11102048
捐赠科研通 3231509
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1786448
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 870058
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 801798