Clinical outcomes of MED and iLESSYS® Delta for the treatment of lumbar central spinal stenosis and lateral recess stenosis: A comparison study

腰椎管狭窄症 椎管狭窄
作者
Boyu Wu,Chengjie Xiong,Lin-ying Tan,Dongdong Zhao,Feng Xu,Hui Kang
出处
期刊:Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine [Spandidos Publications]
卷期号:20 (6): 1-1 被引量:6
标识
DOI:10.3892/etm.2020.9382
摘要

Microendoscopic discectomy (MED) is an established procedure used to treat lumbar central spinal stenosis (LCSS) and lateral recess stenosis (LRS). The Interlaminar Endoscopic Surgical System iLESSYS® Delta approach has been developed from the traditional interlaminar endoscopic technique for the treatment of LCSS and LRS. In the present study, MED was used as a reference to evaluate this newly developed approach. A total of 82 and 52 patients with radicular leg pain and/or neurogenic claudication symptoms were treated by spinal canal decompression using the MED or iLESSYS® Delta approach, respectively. The clinical outcomes of the patients were analyzed using the Modified MacNab's criteria, visual analogue scale (VAS) leg pain score, VAS back pain score and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score. Finally, the effectiveness of the decompression was evaluated on a cross-sectional area of the dural sac (CSAD) at the disc level. The incision length in the iLESSYS® Delta group was significantly decreased compared with the MED group (P<0.05); however, the duration of the operation in the iLESSYS® Delta group was significantly longer compared with the MED group (P<0.05). The VAS score of the back and ODI score in the iLESSYS® Delta group were significantly decreased compared with the MED group at the 1-week follow-up (P<0.0125). The postoperative CSAD was also significantly increased in both groups compared with before the operation (P<0.05); however, there were no significant differences in the postoperative CSAD between the two groups. The good-to-excellent rates of the MED and iLESSYS® Delta approach were 89.0 and 90.4%, respectively, whereas the complication rates of the MED and iLESSYS® Delta system were 3.66 and 3.85% in the two groups, respectively. In conclusion, the iLESSYS® Delta approach was identified to be comparable with the MED approach for treating LCSS and LRS, demonstrating both precise and limited decompression. In addition, the iLESSYS® Delta approach may reduce the short-term back pain and promote faster recovery compared with the MED.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
晴天完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
CodeCraft应助WCC采纳,获得10
1秒前
善学以致用应助WCC采纳,获得10
1秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助WCC采纳,获得10
1秒前
FashionBoy应助WCC采纳,获得10
1秒前
Ava应助WCC采纳,获得10
1秒前
Orange应助WCC采纳,获得10
1秒前
科研通AI2S应助WCC采纳,获得10
1秒前
Akim应助WCC采纳,获得10
1秒前
wanci应助WCC采纳,获得10
1秒前
九月应助WCC采纳,获得10
1秒前
SHEN发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
苗条书桃完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
5秒前
lilmacy发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
永远完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
害羞钥匙关注了科研通微信公众号
6秒前
6秒前
酷炫枫完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
DamonFri发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
火星上的若颜完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
8秒前
橙子发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
乐空思应助巫马尔槐采纳,获得30
9秒前
郭666发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
Akim应助小傻子采纳,获得10
10秒前
呵呵发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
後zgw完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
星辰大海应助WCC采纳,获得10
10秒前
万能图书馆应助WCC采纳,获得10
10秒前
情怀应助WCC采纳,获得10
10秒前
善学以致用应助WCC采纳,获得10
10秒前
赘婿应助WCC采纳,获得10
11秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 3000
Les Mantodea de guyane 2500
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 510
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 510
Brittle Fracture in Welded Ships 500
Lloyd's Register of Shipping's Approach to the Control of Incidents of Brittle Fracture in Ship Structures 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5941763
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7064301
关于积分的说明 15886517
捐赠科研通 5072163
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2728340
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1686905
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1613251